No ser dueño del hombre de paja; Control El Hombre De Paja.

No es dueño del hombre de paja; Control El Hombre De Paja.

Si usted no es el beneficiario / propietario del hombre de paja usted no es responsable de sus deudas u obligaciones. Si usted está en control, usted tiene el mayor gravamen mantener interés en el hombre de paja; Usted debe ser pagado antes de que alguien más recoja del hombre de paja, y usted no puede ir a la cárcel para su misdoing. Una mirada a la estructura de la entidad de hombre de paja muestra la relación de propiedad / control, y la posición que es mejor mantener. Antes del proceso de redención, el hombre es considerado tanto un beneficiario en la relación como una garantía para el hombre de paja. [Redención es un término usado entre las personas amantes de la libertad para describir el proceso de recuperar el control de su hombre de paja]. Después de la redención, el hombre ya no es un beneficiario, y ya no es garantía. Después de la redención, el hombre es el controlador y acreedor con el mayor gravamen mantener el interés en el hombre de paja. El hombre está ahora en una relación agregada con el hombre de paja. No es dueño del hombre de paja, pero controla al hombre de paja por el interés principal de retener el interés.

En este país, el poder fue concedido al gobierno por el pueblo. El poder es concedido al gobierno por el pueblo individualmente – para crear estados, y por el pueblo en su conjunto para crear el gobierno nacional. Una vez que las personas decidieron individualmente crear Estados, sólo pueden cambiar la política o la ley del Estado como personas colectivamente. Eso es porque han aceptado ser parte del público. Son una persona en un cuerpo más grande de personas que actúan colectivamente.

La gente está en el estado y el gobierno nacional en ese mismo tiempo. El gobierno público es una entidad artificial. El gobierno es propiedad y controlado por la misma gente. Así que el gobierno es una organización única, no una organización agregada. Mientras un hombre está tratando públicamente, él está en una relación única con el público. El hombre de paja, siendo artificial, vive en el lugar artificial llamado público. Al mismo tiempo que las personas actúan colectivamente en el cuerpo más grande de personas llamado el Estado y el Gobierno Nacional, mantienen su capacidad para actuar individualmente sobre una base privada. La gente no renunció a los derechos que no delegaron en el gobierno – ellos conservaron esos derechos. Cualquier hombre puede contratar privadamente como mejor les parezca y el gobierno no puede interferir con los contratos privados de los hombres. El hombre de paja vive en el lado público del gobierno. Es parte del gobierno público y funciona bajo las leyes del público. Esto es necesario y apropiado porque el creador de una entidad tiene el derecho de controlarlo.

Desde que el gobierno creó el hombre de paja, es justo que el hombre de paja viva bajo las reglas de su creador. Pero una vez que el hombre de paja ha sido redimido, el gobierno ya no controla al hombre de paja. Ahora está controlado por el hombre que usa su derecho a contratos privados.

El hombre ha dejado al público como beneficiario en exclusiva relación con el hombre de paja para vivir en privado como acreedor en una relación agregada con el hombre de paja. En lo que se refiere a esta relación, el hombre de paja es de control privado. El hombre de paja sigue existiendo como entidad pública porque es el único mundo en el que tiene realidad. Su relación con el hombre es privada. La relación con el hombre que es está controlando porque el hombre tiene un gravamen de prioridad más alta en el hombre de paja que el gobierno.

Ahora que comprendemos quién es el hombre de paja, es apropiado preguntarse quién se beneficia de la creación del hombre de paja.

Veremos que el hombre de paja beneficia al creador (el gobierno), a cualquier empresa que lo use ya usted.

El gobierno comenzó a beneficiarse del hombre de paja en 1933. En el artículo sobre la bancarrota de los Estados Unidos, ya hemos visto evidencias de que los Estados Unidos fueron a la bancarrota en 1933. Cuando esto sucedió, los gobernadores de todos los estados se reunieron para discutir lo que debería Ser hecho. Los gobernadores del estado hicieron una “promesa” al gobierno federal, para financiar la bancarrota. Prometían los activos y la energía de las personas pertenecientes a los gobiernos estatales. Ellos respaldarían al “gobierno” y asegurarían la deuda nacional. Pero había un problema: los estados sólo podían hablar por la gente en su capacidad pública. No podían comprometerse con los seres humanos o la propiedad privados, vivos. Así que fue necesario crear un “puente” entre los vivos y los acreedores para la bancarrota. La respuesta fue crear hombres de paja para que permanecieran en el lugar del pueblo. Ahora el único problema era idear un esquema por el cual la gente aceptaría contratar con el hombre de paja como su aval.

Cuando los gobernadores hicieron la promesa, acordaron registrar el formulario de solicitud de las actas de nacimiento de la gente con el Departamento de Comercio de los Estados Unidos. El formulario de solicitud del certificado de nacimiento es el instrumento de garantía (garantía) utilizado para respaldar la promesa. El hombre de paja, la ficción legal se creó usando el nombre en el certificado de nacimiento y escribiéndolo en mayúsculas, la designación para una ficción legal. Entonces, debido a la “promesa”, la gente estaba decidida a ser el representante y la garantía de la ficción legal. Así es como nos hicieron responsables de pagar la deuda de los Estados Unidos.

Cuando el “gobierno” o cualquier corporación usa cualquier proceso, lo están usando contra la ficción legal, que quieren que la gente piense que es ellos. Pero cuando un nombre está escrito en mayúsculas, NO ES el nombre de una persona real! Es la designación de una ficción legal – que es una entidad totalmente separada. Un ser humano vivo no puede ser una ficción legal, y una ficción legal no puede ser un ser humano vivo. Uno es real o natural, el otro es creado por la “ley”. Porque todo se basa en el pago de la quiebra, el hombre de paja es el deudor y el “gobierno” es el agente del acreedor, los banqueros internacionales que poseen la Reserva Federal.

Cada vez que una agencia gubernamental (como un tribunal) determina la responsabilidad, es una responsabilidad del hombre de paja legal ya que todo se hace en el comercio. El pueblo se presume, como lo demuestra la promesa de sus gobernadores, para ser la garantía para el hombre de paja y deben pagar la responsabilidad.

Ahora veamos cómo el hombre de paja beneficia a otros.

Nuestro hombre de paja pensado como una “utilidad de transmisión” que definimos como “un agente exclusivamente utilizado con el propósito de transmitir la actividad comercial para el beneficio de la parte asegurada”. Gobierno y grandes empresas han establecido un sistema para que la única manera un hombre puede acceder a los bienes y servicios de la nación es a través del hombre de paja. El hombre de paja sirve como una utilidad a través de la cual los bienes y servicios pueden ser transmitidos a usted. Usted está obligado a interactuar con la sociedad a través de su hombre de paja.

Usted notará que el nombre del hombre de paja se usa en prácticamente todos los documentos públicos, incluyendo pero no limitado a: certificado de nacimiento, licencia de conducir, pasaporte, tarjeta del Seguro Social, cheques bancarios y declaraciones), tarjetas de crédito, cheques que recibe de su Empleador, documentos legales, cualquier carta de la entidad gubernamental en cualquier nivel, etc. Usted descubrirá que las agencias gubernamentales, bancos y otras corporaciones, tribunales y agencias tributarias tratan con usted exclusivamente a través del hombre de paja. Estas organizaciones insisten en tratar con usted sólo a través de una versión completa de su nombre en todos y cada uno de los principales documentos, contratos, cuentas y acuerdos con ellos.

Uno de los muchos “beneficios” y servicios disponibles a través de su hombre de paja es su Número de Seguro Social (SSN). El SSN es un número “público” asociado con una “persona pública”, su hombre de paja. El SSN es un beneficio porque le permite abrir una cuenta bancaria o conseguir un trabajo. Una ley federal fue aprobada en 1994 que hizo un requisito para dar su SSN para obtener una licencia de conducir. Sería difícil (aunque no imposible) hacer cualquiera de estas cosas sin usar el SSN. Todas estas cosas, y muchas más, pueden considerarse como “beneficios” concedidos al hombre de paja.

Pero estos beneficios vienen con un precio. Debe ser obvio que el hombre de paja no tiene cuerpo, y que se benefician del consumo / uso de los bienes y servicios puestos a disposición a través del hombre de paja. En este punto, usted probablemente no tiene título a su hombre de paja (el proceso de redención puede corregir este problema). Dado que estas cosas son ciertas, también es cierto que usted es el responsable de cumplir con los pasivos públicos asociados con los “beneficios” que disfruta cortesía de su hombre de paja. Estos pasivos públicos incluyen pero no se limitan a impuesto sobre la renta, impuesto a la seguridad social, más cualquier y todas las deudas que el hombre de paja incurre.

Para más pruebas de que el hombre de paja no es usted, mire sus cheques personales. Aquí hay un ejemplo de un cheque . Fíjate en el nombre de la tapa, John’s straw man. Usted no encontrará su verdadero nombre en sus cheques. También observe la línea de la firma que termina con las letras “MP” que significa “micro-impresión”. Si miras atentamente la firma, notarás que no es una línea sólida. La línea se compone de algunas palabras y espacios que se repiten una y otra vez. La línea de la firma aumentó 60 veces. Usted puede ver claramente que las palabras que componen la línea son “FIRMA AUTORIZADA”.

La razón por la línea de la firma en los cheques personales se compone de las palabras “FIRMA AUTORIZADA” es porque es una imposibilidad física para el titular de la cuenta (su hombre de paja) para firmar el cheque. Recuerde, su hombre de paja no tiene manos con las que firmar el cheque. Los bancos saben que cada firma que aparece en un cheque personal es la firma del agente de carne y sangre, el representante autorizado, usted. Sin embargo, las palabras se imprimen en microimpresión para ocultar el hecho de que usted es el representante autorizado en lugar del principal de la cuenta. Cuando usted firma el cheque o cualquier otro documento para el hombre de paja, que son en realidad una parte acomodadora, es decir, la garantía, y por lo tanto 100% responsable de todo lo que el principal (strawman) es responsable. Prueba adicional de que usted es responsable de los beneficios que recibe a través de su hombre de paja.

No se desespere, hay una manera de salir de este malestar. Utilice las limas de UCC y nuestros ebooks para tomar control de su hombre de paja (un proceso que se llama a menudo redención). Usted se convierte en el acreedor de su hombre de paja que se convierte en el deudor a usted. Puede presentar una declaración de financiamiento de UCC para recibir el reconocimiento oficial, oficial de este contrato privado. Este UCC es una declaración de financiamiento que crea un interés en la propiedad que asegura el pago / cumplimiento de una obligación por su hombre de paja por los servicios que le presten. Esta presentación UCC establece una posición de antigüedad de la reclamación sobre otros acreedores que pueden hacer una reclamación basada en la fecha y hora de la presentación. De esta manera, si alguna parte ataca los bienes de tu hombre de paja, tendrás una reclamación superior sobre ella.

Imagínese como un niño, usted o alguien que usted conoce puede haber tenido un amigo imaginario. Es posible que se sorprenda al saber que existe evidencia de que usted ha tenido un gemelo ficticio desde el momento en que su madre y su padre permitieron que se presentara una Acta de Nacimiento para usted. Este amigo creativo no es real, sino artificial. Es un hombre de paja, una entidad artificial que tiene un nombre muy similar al tuyo.

Aquí está una definición de hombre de paja: “Un frente”, un tercero que está puesto en el nombre sólo para participar en una transacción. Parte nominal de una transacción … ” [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6ª edición] ” The También se utiliza en contextos comerciales y de propiedad cuando se hace una transferencia a un partido, el hombre de paja, simplemente con el propósito de retransferir al cedente con el fin de lograr algún propósito no permitido de otra manera “. [Barron’s, 3ª Edición]

Así que, en los términos de Layman, ¿Qué es un hombre de paja? El hombre de paja es una persona artificial. El hombre de paja fue creado por ley poco después de haber nacido a través del registro de la solicitud de su certificado de nacimiento. El nombre del hombre de paja es tu nombre en TODAS LAS CARTAS DE CAPITAL. Usted notará que la inscripción en el certificado de nacimiento es su nombre en letras mayúsculas.

La lengua inglesa tiene reglas precisas de la gramática que no hacen ninguna disposición para escribir sustantivos apropiados en letras del todo-capital. Por lo tanto, su nombre escrito con mayúsculas es un nombre ficticio. Su hombre de paja tiene el mismo nombre que su nombre, pero es una entidad artificial que sólo existe “por la fuerza de o en la contemplación de la ley”. El nombre de la mayúscula no es su “nombre verdadero” que consiste en el nombre (cristiano) dado más el apellido (apellido), y aparece con solamente letras iniciales mayúsculas. La versión de todo nombre de su nombre es un NOMBRE COMERCIAL, el nombre bajo el cual “hacer negocios”.

Podemos también decir que el hombre de paja es una “persona” según el diccionario legal.

Persona: 1. un ser humano. 2. Una entidad (como una corporación) que es reconocida por la ley como teniendo los derechos y deberes de un ser humano. ” [Blacks Law Dictionary, 7ª Edición]

(El hombre de paja también se puede decir que es una “persona artificial”, que también se define en el diccionario jurídico.)

Una Entidad: como una corporación, creada por ley y que goza de ciertos derechos y deberes legales de un ser humano; Un ser, real o imaginario, que por razones de razonamiento jurídico se trata más o menos como un ser humano. – También se denomina persona ficticia; persona jurídica; persona legal; Persona moral “. [Blacks Law Dictionary, 7ª edición]

(Un hombre de paja también puede ser pensado como una “ficción legal”.)

Ficción Legal: Asunción de hecho hecha por la corte como base para decidir una cuestión legal. Una situación ideada por la ley para permitir que un tribunal disponga de un asunto. ” [Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition]

A medida que exploramos más lejos, debemos distinguir entre el hombre de paja (un hombre o persona), y el ser real, carne y sangre (ser humano) al que llamaremos un “hombre”. El “hombre” tiene una definición legal.

Un Ser Humano: Una persona del sexo masculino. Un macho de la especie humana por encima de la edad de la pubertad. En el sentido más amplio, el término incluye no sólo el sexo masculino adulto de la especie humana, sino las mujeres y los niños. . En la ley feudal, un vasallo; Un inquilino o un feudatorio “.
[Blacks Law Dictionary, 5ª edición]

Así que concluimos que “hombre” es un término de la naturaleza. Pero, ¿quién creó la naturaleza? Algunos dirían Dios, otros dirían el Creador (un término usado a menudo por el fundador de nuestro país), mientras que otros podrían tener una opinión diferente. Por otro lado, vemos a “persona” como un término de la ley civil. ¿Quién es el creador del derecho civil?
Derecho civil: una regla de conducta civil prescrita por el poder supremo de un Estado. La ley civil o municipal del imperio romano “.
[Diccionario de Ballentine’s Law, 3ª Edición]

Así, los reyes, emperadores o cuerpos legislativos que actúan en calidad de soberanos son los “creadores” del derecho civil. Cuando nuestro gobierno actúa como un soberano, está actuando fuera de su autoridad constitucional. Así vemos que un hombre y una persona son términos muy diferentes que identifican cosas muy diferentes. Si estudias el derecho civil romano, verás que se origina y usa ficciones de la ley, es decir, conceptos que son contrarios al orden natural de las cosas y basados ​​en presunciones que son falsas. Te darás cuenta de que esta persona reconocida en el derecho civil es una entidad ficticia. Usted llegará a ver la gran diferencia entre el hombre y la persona. Así que el hombre de paja es una persona, un nombre público que se reconoce en una sociedad civil.

Hemos mencionado “ficción legal” y “ficción de la ley”, así que veamos cómo se definen.

“Ficción de la Ley. Una suposición o suposición de la ley de que algo que es o puede ser falso es cierto, o que existe un estado de hechos que nunca ha ocurrido realmente.Una suposición, a efectos de la justicia, de un hecho que no O no puede existir.Una regla de ley que asume como verdadera, y no permitirá ser refutada, algo que es falso, pero no imposible “. [Black’s Law Dictionary 5ª edición]

Esta distinción entre un hombre y una persona es un concepto difícil de entender. Pero una comprensión adecuada de la relación entre el gobierno, el hombre y el hombre de paja es esencial para obtener mayor libertad. Si bien el concepto de estas relaciones es muy simple, hay algunos principios fundamentales que deben ser explorados. Hemos mencionado que el hombre de paja es una entidad o persona artificial. Pero hay varios tipos de organizaciones o entidades artificiales. Hay soles corporativos, corporaciones agregadas, corporaciones municipales, fideicomisos vivos revocables (únicos) y organizaciones empresariales no incorporadas. Muchas personas usan estas entidades por varias razones, incluyendo el control personal sobre sus activos; Protección contra demandas y juicios; Evitación de sucesiones; Evitación de impuestos sobre bienes; Reducción de la obligación tributaria; Y muchas otras razones. Examinaremos la diferencia entre una entidad única y una entidad agregada; La construcción de estas entidades y los resultados de esa construcción como se aplica al hombre de paja.

En todas las organizaciones hay dos posiciones operativas básicas:

* La acción : titular / propietario / beneficiario (lo llamaremos la posición de beneficiario)

* El Oficial / presidente / presidente / fideicomisario (lo llamaremos la posición operacional).

Una Corporación Única, definida por el Diccionario de Derecho de Black, es una que consiste en una persona solamente y sus sucesores en una estación particular, que son incorporados por la ley para darles algunas capacidades legales y ventajas, particularmente la de la perpetuidad que en su Estado natural como personas que no podrían tener. En una sola corporación, una persona ocupa los dos puestos operativos de la organización. Podrá establecerse una persona jurídica constituida bajo la autoridad legislativa. Se considera por estatuto un ciudadano del gobierno.

Como tal, los guardias seguros de la declaración de derechos no se extienden a soles corporativos. Los tribunales han advertido que los propietarios de licencias con licencia legal son en realidad un organismo gubernamental por definición de cómo se crean. La mayoría de las personas que eligen una única organización lo hacen porque mantienen el control personal sobre sus activos.

Una Corporación Agregada como Corporaciones o Fideicomisos Empresariales, de acuerdo con el Diccionario de la Ley de Black, está compuesta por un número de individuos investidos con poderes corporativos. Con una organización agregada, las diferentes partes deben mantener las posiciones de beneficiario y operativas. Si la misma parte los sostiene, son una organización única. Los miembros de la familia siempre se cuentan como una sola parte, por lo tanto sería una organización única. En una organización agregada, el que está en control es inmune a los daños o pasivos de los beneficiarios. En una corporación agregada, el titular de la primera posición operativa controla los activos para el titular de la segunda posición operativa. El control de los activos ha sido entregado al control de otra persona. El fundador de la rica familia Rockefeller dijo que uno de sus secretos para la riqueza era “no poseer nada, sino controlar todo”. En otras palabras, siempre funcione a partir de una relación agregada.

Conozca a su hombre de paja: Su hombre de paja (Strawman) es una persona artificial creada por la ley en el momento de su nacimiento, la inscripción de un NOMBRE DE LETRAS TODO-CAPITAL en su certificado / documento de nacimiento, que es un documento de título y un instrumento negociable . Su legítimo nombre cristiano de derecho de nacimiento fue reemplazado con un nombre legal, corporativo de engaño y fraude. Su nombre en letras mayúsculas y minúsculas (Jane Mary Doe) ha estado respondiendo cuando la persona legal, su nombre en ALL-CAPTIAL LETTERS (JANE MARY DOE), es dirigida, y por lo tanto los dos han sido reconocidos como uno y el mismo . Cuando, Jane Mary Doe, el legítimo ser distinguirse como otra parte que la persona jurídica, los dos serán separados.

Legalmente, desde que nació su persona artificial, ha sido considerado un esclavo o sirviente contratado a los diversos gobiernos federales, provinciales y municipales a través de su certificado de nacimiento emitido por el ESTADO, creado por ESTADO, en nombre de su persona con todas las tapas. Su certificado de nacimiento fue emitido para que el emisor pudiera reclamar un título “exclusivo” a la persona jurídica creada. Esto se agravó aún más cuando obtuvo voluntariamente una licencia de conducir y un SSN (Número de Seguro Social). El estado incluso posee su vida personal y privada a través de su STATE-emitió licencia de matrimonio / certificado emitido en los nombres de todos los caps. No has tenido derechos en el nacimiento, el matrimonio, ni lo tendrás incluso en la muerte a menos que vuelvas a capturar a tu hombre de paja. El ESTADO mantiene el título a su persona jurídica que creó a través de su certificado de nacimiento, hasta que Jane Mary Doe, el legítimo propietario, el titular

A su debido tiempo, del instrumento, que es usted mismo, lo reclama / redime. El 5 de abril de 1933, el Presidente Franklin Delano Roosevelt, bajo Orden Ejecutiva, emitida el 5 de abril de 1933, declaró: “Todas las personas deben entregar en o antes del 1 de mayo de 1933 todas las monedas de oro, lingotes de oro y certificados de oro ahora propiedad Por ellos a un Banco de la Reserva Federal, sucursal o agencia, oa cualquier banco miembro del Sistema de la Reserva Federal “. James A. Farley, Director General de Correos en ese momento, requería que cada maestro de correos en el país publicara una copia de la Orden Ejecutiva en un lugar visible dentro de cada rama de la Oficina de Correos. Como se indica a continuación en el cuadro de texto:

<span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>CRIMINAL PENALTIES for VIOLATION of EXECUTIVE ORDER $10, 000 fine or 10 years imprisonment, or both, as provided in Section 9 of the order.</span> PENALIDADES CRIMINALES por VIOLACIÓN de ORDEN EJECUTIVO multa de $ 10.000 o 10 años de prisión, o ambos, según lo dispuesto en la Sección 9 de la orden.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Section 9 of the order reads as follows: “Whosoever willfully violates any provisions of this Executive Order or of these regulations or of any rule, regulation or license issued thereunder may be fined not more than $10,000, or if a natural person, may be imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both; & any officer, director or agency of any corporation who knowingly participates in any such violation may be punished by a like fine, imprisonment, or both. NOTE: Stated within a written document received September 17, 1997, from the US Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, Office of the Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Richard L. Shiffin, in response to a FOIA, was the following: “A fact that is frequently overlooked is that Executive Orders & proclamations of the President normally have no direct effect upon private persons or their property, & instead, normally constitute only directives or instructions to officers or employees of the Federal Government.</span> La sección 9 de la orden dice lo siguiente: “Quien viole intencionalmente cualquier disposición de esta Orden Ejecutiva o de estas regulaciones o de cualquier regla, regulación o licencia emitida bajo ella podrá ser multada no más de $ 10,000, o si una persona natural puede ser encarcelada Por no más de 10 años, o ambos, y cualquier funcionario, director o agencia de cualquier corporación que a sabiendas participe en tal violación puede ser castigado con una multa similar, encarcelamiento, o ambos NOTA: De acuerdo con un documento escrito recibido el 17 de septiembre , Del Departamento de Justicia de los Estados Unidos, Oficina del Asesor Jurídico, Oficina del Subprocurador Asistente, Richard L. Shiffin, en respuesta a una FOIA, fue el siguiente: “Un hecho que se pasa por alto con frecuencia es que las Órdenes Ejecutivas & Las proclamaciones del Presidente normalmente no tienen efecto directo sobre las personas privadas o sus bienes y, en cambio, normalmente constituyen sólo directivas o instrucciones a funcionarios o empleados del Gobierno Federal.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>The exception is those cases in which the President is expressly authorized or required by laws enacted by the Congress to issue an Executive order or proclamation dealing with the legal rights or obligations of members of the public.</span> La excepción son los casos en que el Presidente está expresamente autorizado o requerido por las leyes promulgadas por el Congreso para emitir una orden ejecutiva o proclama relativa a los derechos u obligaciones legales de los miembros del público.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Such as issuance of Selective Service Regulations, establishment of boards to investigate certain labor disputes, & establishment of quotas or fees with respect to certain imports into this country.” Note: it seems rather obvious that President Franklin D. Roosevelt was not “expressly authorized or required” to “issue an Executive Order or proclamation” demanding the public (private) to relinquish their privately held gold. The order (proclamation) issued by Roosevelt was an undisciplined act of treason. Two months after the Executive Order, on June 5, 1933, the Senate & House of Representatives, 73d Congress, 1st session, at 4:30 pm approve House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192: Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard & Abrogate The Gold Clause, Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins & currencies of the United States. HJR-192 states, in part, that “Every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the oblige a right to require p</span> Tales como la emisión de Reglamentos de Servicio Selectivo, el establecimiento de juntas para investigar ciertos conflictos laborales y el establecimiento de cuotas o cuotas con respecto a ciertas importaciones en este país “. Nota: parece bastante obvio que el Presidente Franklin D. Roosevelt no estaba” expresamente autorizado O se le exigía “emitir una Orden Ejecutiva o una proclamación” exigiendo al público (privado) renunciar a su oro privado.La orden (proclamación) emitida por Roosevelt fue un acto indisciplinado de traición. Dos meses después de la Orden Ejecutiva, el 5 de junio , 1933, Senado y Cámara de Representantes, 73d Congreso, 1ª sesión, a las 4:30 pm Aprobar la Resolución Conjunta de la Cámara de Representantes (HJR) 192: Resolución Conjunta para Suspender el Estándar de Oro y Abrogar la Cláusula de Oro, Las monedas y monedas de los Estados Unidos.HJR-192 establece, en parte, que “Toda disposición contenida en o hecha con respecto a cualquier obligación que pretenda dar a la obligación un derecho a exigir p</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>ayment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in any amount of money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy, & no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred.</span> Se declara que está en contra de la política pública, y ninguna disposición de este tipo estará contenida o hecha con respecto a ninguna obligación en adelante incurrida .</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provisions is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any such coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public & private debts.” HJR-192 goes on to state: “As used in this resolution, the term ‘obligation’ means an obligation (including every obligation of & to the United States, excepting currency) payable in money of the United States;</span> Toda obligación, hasta ahora o en adelante incurrida, contenida o no contenida en ella o hecha con respecto a ella, será liberada mediante el pago, dólar por dólar, en cualquier moneda o moneda que en el momento del pago tenga curso legal para el pago público Y las deudas privadas “. HJR-192 continúa declarando:” Como se usa en esta resolución, el término “obligación” significa una obligación (incluyendo todas las obligaciones de los Estados Unidos, exceptuando la moneda) pagaderas en dinero de los Estados Unidos;</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>& the term ‘coin or currency’ means coin or currency of the United States, including Federal Reserve notes & circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks & national banking associations.” HJR-192 superseded Public Law (what passes as law today is only “color of law”), replacing it with public policy. This eliminated our ability to PAY our debts, allowing only for their DISCHARGE. When we use any commercial paper (checks, drafts, warrants, federal reserve notes, etc.), & accept it as money, we simply pass the unpaid debt attached to the paper on to others, by way of our purchases & transactions. This unpaid debt, under public policy, now carries a public liability for its collection. In other words, all debt is now public. The United States government, in order to provide necessary goods & services, created a commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the property, labor, life & body of its citizens, as payment for the debt (bankruptcy). This commercial bond made chattel (property) ou</span> Y el término “moneda o moneda” significa moneda o moneda de los Estados Unidos, incluyendo notas de la Reserva Federal y notas circulantes de bancos de la Reserva Federal y asociaciones bancarias nacionales. “HJR-192 reemplazó al Derecho Público (lo que pasa como ley hoy es sólo” color De la ley “), reemplazándola con la política pública, eliminando nuestra capacidad de PAGAR nuestras deudas, permitiendo solo su DESCARGA Cuando utilizamos cualquier papel comercial (cheques, giros, warrants, notas de la reserva federal, etc.) Como dinero, simplemente pasamos la deuda no pagada adjunta al papel a otros, a través de nuestras compras y transacciones.Esta deuda no pagada, en virtud de la política pública, ahora lleva un pasivo público para su colección.En otras palabras, toda la deuda es ahora El gobierno de los Estados Unidos, con el fin de proporcionar bienes y servicios necesarios, creó un bono comercial (pagaré), comprometiendo la propiedad, el trabajo, la vida y el cuerpo de sus ciudadanos, como pago de la deuda (quiebra). Fianza realizada (bienes)</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>t of every man, woman & child in the United States.</span> T de cada hombre, mujer y niño en los Estados Unidos.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>We became nothing more than “human resources” & collateral for the debt.</span> Nos volvimos nada más que “recursos humanos” y colateral para la deuda.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>This was without our knowledge &/or our consent.</span> Esto fue sin nuestro conocimiento y / o nuestro consentimiento.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>How?</span> ¿Cómo?</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>It was done through the filing (registration) of our birth certificates!</span> Esto se hizo a través de la presentación (registro) de nuestros certificados de nacimiento!</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>The United States government -actually the elected & appointed administrators of government -took (& still do, to this day) certified copies of all our birth certificates & placed them in the United States Department of Commerce … as registered securities.</span> El gobierno de los Estados Unidos -actualmente los administradores elegidos y designados del gobierno- (y todavía lo hacen, hasta el día de hoy) copias certificadas de todos nuestros certificados de nacimiento y los colocó en el Departamento de Comercio de los Estados Unidos … como valores registrados.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>These securities, each of which carries an estimated $1,000,000 (one million) dollar value, have been (& still are) circulated around the world as collateral for loans, entries on the asset side of ledgers, etc., just like any other security.</span> Estos valores, cada uno de los cuales tiene un valor estimado de $ 1,000,000 (un millón) de dólares, han sido (y siguen siendo) circulados en todo el mundo como garantía para préstamos, entradas en el lado del activo de libros, etc.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>There’s just one problem, we didn’t authorize it.</span> Sólo hay un problema, no lo autorizamos.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>The United States is a District of Columbia corporation.</span> Los Estados Unidos es una corporación del Distrito de Columbia.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>In Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec.</span> En el volumen 20: Corpus Juris Sec.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>§ 1785 we find “The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State” (see: NY re: Merriam 36 NE 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287).</span> § 1785 encontramos “El gobierno de los Estados Unidos es una corporación extranjera con respecto a un Estado” (ver: NY re: Merriam 36 NE 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287).</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Since a corporation is a fictitious “person” (it can not speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it can not, by itself, function in the real world.</span> Puesto que una corporación es una “persona” ficticia (no puede hablar, ver, tocar, oler, etc.), no puede, por sí misma, funcionar en el mundo real.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>It needs a conduit, a transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to “connect” the fictional person, & fictional world in which it exists, to the real world.</span> Necesita un conducto, una utilidad transmisora, un enlace de algún tipo, para “conectar” a la persona ficticia, y el mundo ficticio en el que existe, al mundo real.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>LIVING people, exist in a real world, not a fictional, virtual world.</span> Las personas VIVAS, existen en un mundo real, no en un mundo ficticio virtual.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>But government does exist in a fictional world, & can only deal directly with other fictional or virtual persons, agencies, states, etc.. In order for a fictional person to deal with real people there must be a connection, a liaison, & a go-between.</span> Pero el gobierno existe en un mundo de ficción, y sólo puede tratar directamente con otras personas ficticias o virtuales, agencias, estados, etc. Para que una persona de ficción se ocupe de personas reales debe haber una conexión, un enlace y Intermedio</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>This can be something as simple as a contract.</span> Esto puede ser algo tan simple como un contrato.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>When both “persons,” the real & the fictional, agree to the terms of a contract, there is a connection, intercourse, dealings, there is a communication, an exchange.</span> Cuando ambas “personas”, lo real y lo ficcional, aceptan los términos de un contrato, hay una conexión, relaciones, relaciones, hay una comunicación, un intercambio.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>There is business!</span> ¡Hay negocios!</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>But there is another way for fictional government to deal with the real man & woman: through the use of a representative, a liaison, & the go-between.</span> Pero hay otra manera de que el gobierno ficticio se ocupe del verdadero hombre y mujer: a través del uso de un representante, un enlace, y el intermediario.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Who is this go-between, this liaison that connects fictional government to real men & women?</span> ¿Quién es este intermediario, este enlace que conecta el gobierno ficticio con hombres y mujeres reales?</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>It’s a government created shadow, a fictional man or woman … with the same name as ours.</span> Es una sombra creada por el gobierno, un hombre o mujer de ficción … con el mismo nombre que el nuestro.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>This PERSON was created by using our birth certificates as the MCO (manufacturer’s certificate of origin) & the state in which we were born as the “port of entry”.</span> Esta PERSONA fue creada utilizando nuestros certificados de nacimiento como el MCO (certificado de origen del fabricante) y el estado en el que nacimos como el “puerto de entrada”.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>This gave fictional government a fictional PERSON with whom to deal directly.</span> Esto dio al gobierno ficticio una PERSONA ficticia con quien tratar directamente.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>This PERSON is a straw man (strawman).</span> Esta PERSONA es un hombre de paja (strawman).</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin: A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety.</span> STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latín: Un hombre de paja, sin sustancia, presentado como fianza o fianza.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>This definition comes from Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th.</span> Esta definición viene de Black’s Law Dictionary, 6to.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Edition, page 1421. Following the definition of STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black’s we find the next word, straw man (Strawman).</span> Edición, página 1421. Siguiendo la definición de STRAMINEUS HOMO en Black’s encontramos la siguiente palabra, straw man (Strawman).</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction.</span> STRAWMAN: Un frente, un tercero que está puesto en nombre sólo para participar en una transacción.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Nominal party to a transaction;</span> Parte nominal de una transacción;</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>one who acts as an agent for another for the purposes of taking title to real property & executing whatever documents & instruments the principal may direct.</span> Uno que actúa como un agente para otro con el fin de tomar el título de propiedad real y ejecutar cualquier documento e instrumentos que el director puede dirigir.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed.</span> Persona que compra la propiedad por otra para ocultar la identidad del comprador real o para lograr algún propósito de otra manera no permitido.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the term “strawman” as: 1: a weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted 2: a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction.</span> El Noveno Nuevo Diccionario Colegiado de Webster define el término “hombre de paja” como: 1: una oposición débil o imaginaria establecida sólo para ser fácilmente confundida 2: una persona establecida para servir de cobertura para una transacción usualmente cuestionable.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>The straw man (Strawman) can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant;</span> El hombre de paja (Strawman) se puede resumir como un soporte imaginario, pasivo para el participante real;</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>a front;</span> Un frente;</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>a blind;</span> un ciego;</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>a person regarded as a nonentity.</span> Una persona considerada como un nonentity.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>The straw man (Strawman) is a “shadow”, a go-between.</span> El hombre de paja (Strawman) es una “sombra”, un intermediario.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>For quite some time a rather large number of people in this country have known that a man or woman’s name, written in ALL CAPS, or last name first, does not identify real, living people.</span> Durante bastante tiempo un número bastante grande de personas en este país han sabido que el nombre de un hombre o una mujer, escrito en ALL CAPS, o apellido primero, no identifica a personas reales y vivas.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Taking this one step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no provisions for the abbreviation of people’s names, ie initials are not to be used.</span> Dando este paso más allá, las reglas de gramática para el idioma inglés no tienen provisiones para la abreviatura de nombres de personas, es decir, no se deben usar iniciales.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>As an example, John Adam Smith is correct.</span> Como ejemplo, John Adam Smith es correcto.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>ANYTHING else is not correct.</span> Cualquier otra cosa no es correcta.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Not Smith, John Adam or Smith, John A. or J. Smith or JA Smith or JOHN ADAM SMITH or SMITH, JOHN or any other variation.</span> No Smith, John Adam o Smith, John A. o J. Smith o JA Smith o JOHN ADAM SMITH o SMITH, JOHN o cualquier otra variación.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>NOTHING, other than John Adam Smith identifies the real, living man.</span> NADA, aparte de John Adam Smith, identifica al hombre real y vivo.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>All other appellations identify either a deceased man or a fictitious man: such as a corporation or a STRAW MAN (STRAWMAN).</span> Todas las demás denominaciones identifican a un hombre fallecido o un hombre ficticio: tal como una corporación o un HOMBRE DE PAJA (STRAWMAN).</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Over the years government, through its “public” school system, has managed to pull the wool over our eyes & keep US ignorant of some very important facts.</span> A lo largo de los años, el gobierno, a través de su sistema escolar “público”, ha logrado sacar la lana sobre nuestros ojos y mantener a Estados Unidos ignorante de algunos hechos muy importantes.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Because all facets of the media (print, radio, television) have an ever-increasing influence in our lives, & because media is controlled (with the issuance of licenses, etc.) by government & its agencies, we have slowly & systematically been led to believe that any form/appellation of our names is, in fact, still us: as long as the spelling is correct.</span> Debido a que todas las facetas de los medios de comunicación (impresión, radio, televisión) tienen una influencia cada vez mayor en nuestras vidas, y porque los medios están controlados (con la emisión de licencias, etc.) por el gobierno y sus agencias, hemos estado lenta y sistemáticamente Llevó a creer que cualquier forma / denominación de nuestros nombres es, de hecho, todavía nosotros: siempre y cuando la ortografía sea correcta.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>WRONG!</span> ¡INCORRECTO!</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>We were never told, with full & open disclosure, what our government officials were planning to do & why.</span> Nunca nos dijeron, con revelación completa y abierta, lo que nuestros funcionarios del gobierno estaban planeando hacer y por qué.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>We were never told that government (the United States) was a corporation, a fictitious “person”.</span> Nunca nos dijeron que el gobierno (Estados Unidos) era una corporación, una “persona” ficticia.</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>We were never told that government had quietly, almost secretly, created a shadow, a STRAW MAN (STRAWMAN) for each & every AMERICAN, so that government could not only “control” the people, but also raise an almost unlimited amount of revenue – so it could continue not just to exist, but to GROW.</span> Nunca nos dijeron que el gobierno había creado silenciosamente, casi en secreto, una sombra, un HOMBRE DE PAJA (STRAWMAN) para cada uno de los estadounidenses, para que el gobierno no sólo pudiera “controlar” al pueblo, sino también generar una cantidad casi ilimitada de ingresos, Así que podría continuar no sólo para existir, sino para CRECER.</span> We were never told that when government deals with the STRAW MAN (STRAWMAN) it is not dealing with real, living, men & women. We were never told, openly & clearly with full disclosure of all the facts, that since June 5, 1933, we have been unable to pay our debts. We were never told that we had been pledged (& our children, & their children, & their children, & on & on) as collateral, mere chattel, for the debt created by government officials who committed treason in doing so. We were never told that they quietly & cleverly changed the rules, even the game itself, & that the world we perceive as real is in fact fictional -& it’s all for their benefit. We were never told that the STRAW MAN (STRAWMAN) -a fictional person, a creature of the state -is subject to all the codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. decreed by government, but that WE, the real man & woman, are not. We were never told we were being treated as property, as slaves (albeit comfortably for some), while living in the land of the free -& that we could, easily, walk away from the fraud.

Nunca nos ha dicho, que estaban siendo abusado!

Hay algo más que debería saber: Todo, desde junio de 1933, opera en el comercio! Comercio se basa en un acuerdo, contrato. El gobierno tiene un acuerdo implícito con el hombre de paja (Strawman) (creación del gobierno) y el hombre de paja (Strawman) está sujeto a la regla de gobierno, como se ilustró anteriormente. Pero cuando nosotros, la verdadera carne y sangre del hombre y la mujer, paso en su “proceso” nos convertimos en la “garantía” para el hombre de paja de ficción (Hombre de paja). Realidad y ficción se invierten. Entonces llegamos a ser responsables de las deudas, pasivos y obligaciones del hombre de paja (Strawman), renunciando a nuestro carácter real (protegido) como nos ponemos de pie para el hombre de paja de ficción (Hombre de paja).

De manera que podamos una vez más colocar al hombre de paja (Hombre de paja) en el mundo de ficción y nosotros mismos en el mundo real (con todos nuestros “escudos” en su lugar contra el gobierno de ficción) hay que enviar un no negociable (privado) “cargo al usuario” y una no negociable “letra de cambio” al Secretario de Tesoro de los Estados Unidos, junto con una copia de la partida de nacimiento, la evidencia, la MCO, del hombre de paja (hombre de paja). Al hacer esto descargamos nuestra parte de la deuda pública, la liberación de los Estados Unidos, el hombre real, de las deudas, pasivos y obligaciones del hombre de paja (Hombre de paja). Existen esas deudas, compromisos y obligaciones en el mundo comercial ficticio de “anotaciones”, en los equipos y / o en los libros de papel. Es un mundo de “dígitos” y “notas”, no de dinero y de sustancias. Propiedad del hombre real se convierte una vez más exenta de impuestos y libre de gravamen, ya que debe estar de acuerdo con HJR-192.

El envío de la carga no negociable Back & Letra de Cambio accede a nuestra cuenta directa del Tesoro (TDA). Lo que es nuestra TDA? Vamos al Título 26 USC y echar un vistazo a la sección 163 (h) (3) (B) (ii), $ 1.000.000 de limitación: “La cantidad agregada tratado como el endeudamiento de adquisición de cualquier período que no excederá de $ 1.000.000 ($ 500.000 en el caso de una persona casada que presenta una declaración por separado) “.

Esta cuenta $ 1.000.000 (un millón) es para el hombre de paja (Hombre de paja), la “persona” ficticia con el nombre en mayúsculas y / o apellido. Es allí con el propósito de hacer anotaciones en cuenta, para mover figuras, “dígitos” de un lado de libros a la otra. Sin movimiento constante de un tiburón morirá y bastante irónicamente, como el tiburón, debe haber también un movimiento constante en el comercio, o también morirá. Figuras, dígitos, las entradas en libros de contabilidad deben moverse de un lado activo a debitar lado y la parte posterior de nuevo, o comercio muere. Ningún movimiento, ningún comercio. Como se señala más adelante en el cuadro de texto.

The fictional person of government can only function in a fictional commercial world, one where there is no real money, only fictional funds … mere entries, figures, & digits. A presentment from fictional government -from traffic citation to criminal charges -is a negative, commercial “claim” against the straw man (Strawman). This “claim” takes place in the commercial, fictional world of government. “Digits” move from one side of your straw man (Strawman) account to the other, or to a different account. This is today’s commerce. In the past we have addressed these “claims” by fighting them in court, with one “legal process” or another, & failed. We have played the futile, legalistic, dog-&-pony show -a very clever distraction -while the commerce game played on. But what if we refused to play dog-&-pony, & played the commerce game instead? What if we learned how to control the flow & movement of entries, figures, & digits, for our own benefit? <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Is that possible?</span> ¿Es eso posible?</span> And if so, how? How can the real man in the real world, function in the fictional world in which the commerce game exists? When in commerce do as commerce does, use the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)? The UCC1 Financing Statement is the one contract in the world that can NOT be broken & it’s the foundation of the Accepted For Value process. The power of this document is awesome. Since the TDA exists for the straw man (Strawman) -who, until now, has been controlled by government – WE can gain control (& ownership) of the straw man (Strawman) by first activating the TDA & then filing an UCC-1 Financing Statement. This does two things for US. First, by activating the TDA we gain limited control over the funds in the account. This allows US to also move entries, figures, & digits … for OUR benefit. Secondly, by properly filing an UCC-1 Financing Statement we can become the holder in due course of the straw man (Strawman). This gives us virtual ownership of the government created entity. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>So what?</span> ¿Y qué?</span> What does it all mean? Remember earlier we mentioned that a presentment from government or one of its agents or agencies was a negative commercial claim against the straw man (Strawman) (& the Strawman’s account, the TDA)? Remember we told you entries, figures, & digits moved from one side of the account to the other, or to a different account? Well now, with the straw man (Strawman) under our control, government has no access to the TDA & they also lose their go-between, their liaison, their “connection” to the real, living man & woman. From now on, when presented with a “claim” (presentment) from government, we will agree with it (this removes the “controversy”) & we will ACCEPT IT FOR VALUE. By doing this we remove the negative claim against our account & become the “holder in due course” of the presentment. As holder in due course you can require the sworn testimony of the presenter of the “claim” (under penalty of perjury) & request the account be properly adjusted. It’s all business, a commercial undertaking, & the basic procedure is not complicated. In fact, it’s fairly simple. We just have to remember a few things, like: this is not a “legal” procedure -we’re not playing dog-&-pony. This is commerce, & we play by the rules of commerce. We accept the “claim”, become the holder in due course, & challenge whether or not the presenter of the claim had/has the proper authority (the Order) to make the claim (debit our account) in the first place. When they cannot produce the Order (they never can, it was never issued) we request the account be properly adjusted (the charge, the “claim ” goes away). If they don’t adjust the account a request is made for the bookkeeping records showing where the funds in question were assigned. This is done by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate & the Fiduciary Tax Return for this claim. Since the claim has been accepted for value & is prepaid, & our TDA account is exempt from levy, the request for the Fiduciary Tax Estimate & the Fiduciary Tax Return is valid because the information is necessary in determining who is delinquent &/or making claims on the account. If there is no record of the Fiduciary Tax Estimate & the Fiduciary Tax Return, we then request the individual tax estimates & individual tax returns to determine if there is any delinquency. If we receive no favorable response to the above requests, we will then file a currency report on the amount claimed/assessed against our account & begin the commercial process that will force them to either do what’s required or lose everything they own -except for the clothing they are wearing at the time. This is the power of contracts (commerce) & it should be mentioned, at least this one time, that a contract overrides the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, & any other document other than another contract. We should also mention that no process of law -“color” of law under present codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. – can operate upon you, no agent &/or agency of government (including courts) can gain jurisdiction over you, WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT. You, (we) are not within their fictional commercial venue. The Accepted for Value process, however, gives us the ability to deal with “them” -through the use of our transmitting utility/go-between, the straw man (Strawman) -& hold them accountable in their own commercial world, for any action(s) they attempt to take against us. Without a proper Order, & now we know they’re not in possession of such a document, they must leave us alone … or pay the consequences.

Sí, este proceso es de gran alcance. Sí, nos puede liberar de la opresión y el control del gobierno. No se desespere, hay una manera de salir de este malestar. Utilizar UCC y leer nuestros libros electrónicos para tomar el control de su hombre de paja (un proceso que a menudo se llama la redención). Usted se convierte en acreedor durante su hombre de paja que se convierte en deudor para usted. Puede presentar una declaración de financiamiento UCC para recibir oficial, el reconocimiento del gobierno de este contrato privado. Este UCC es una declaración de financiamiento que crea un interés en la propiedad que garantiza el pago / cumplimiento de una obligación por su hombre de paja por los servicios que rendir a él. Esta presentación UCC establece una posición de la antigüedad de la reivindicación frente a otros acreedores que pueden hacer que una demanda basada en la fecha y hora de presentación. De esta manera, si una parte cada vez ataca a los activos de su hombre de paja, que tendrá una mejor derecho sobre ella. Empieza ahora; Nuestra información, las formas, el proceso y los resultados; ¡SON REALES!

UCC PREGUNTAS FRECUENTES

UCC Overview: The Uniform Commercial Code governs commercial transactions. The code includes eleven articles covering a variety of areas such as sales, negotiable instruments, bank deposits and collections, and investment securities. Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), titled Secured Transactions, designates the office of the Secretary of State as the place for the filing and searching of secured transaction documents. Financing statements are filed as a public notice of a security interest in collateral. Record searches are requested to reveal financing statements filed against an organization or individual. For example, when a debtor (borrower) pledges collateral to obtain a loan, a UCC financing statement tells a secured party (creditor) whether others have financing statements against the same collateral. Filing a UCC financing statement is a protective measure because it provides a public notice to other parties. Debtors also benefit because the notice system helps them obtain business funding. Legally, it puts the creditor in the position of a secured creditor; and a perfected UCC financing statement may be acted on in case of default. In the event of a bankruptcy proceeding, the creditor will be in a better position to enforce its legal rights. The national UCC form must be used. Please submit two copies of the UCC form with a self-addressed stamped envelope. One to be filed at the filing office, and the second to be returned to you as an acknowledgement copy. What Are “In Lieu of” Financing Statements? In-Lieu-of, UCC Financing Statements are used to move a filing from a county filing office or another state filing jurisdiction. Guidelines for “In Lieu of” financing statements: The secured party completes a UCC-1 with current information for debtors, secured parties, and collateral. When using the national UCC-1 form follow the instructions on the reverse side of the UCC-1. In addition to the standard filing information, an In-Lieu-Of financing statement requires special wording in the collateral area of the UCC-1 form. Attaching Copies of Filings (the Recommended Solution): If copies of the previously filed financing statement are attached, include the following wording in the collateral area: “This financing statement is filed “in lieu of” a continuation statement. The financing statement attached remains effective.” Attach copies of the original financing statement and subsequent UCC-3 filings. How do I continue a UCC? You may submit a UCC-3 Amendment form as early as six month’s prior to the maturity date of the original filing. Be careful not to use the last day of the six-month window as your mailing date. The filing office will not stamp a received date on the document on non-business days such as weekends, holidays and emergency days. The earlier the Continuation is submitted in the six-month window the better chance it will be filed prior to the lapse or maturity of the UCC. Does the County Recorder, record Financing Statements that are fixture filings? <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Yes.</span> Sí.</span> Section 9-501(a)(1) states that except as “provided in subsection (b), if the local law of this State governs perfection of a security interest or agricultural lien, the office in which to file a financing statement to perfect the security interest or agricultural lien is: The office designated for the filing or recording of a record of a mortgage on the related real property, if: a. The collateral is as-extracted collateral or timber to be cut; or b. The financing statement is filed as a fixture filing and the collateral is goods that are or are to become fixtures and the financing statement is not filed as a fixture filing.” What information is required on a fixture filing? Section 9-502(b) and (c) state the filing requirements needed to perfect a fixture filing. What is the definition of a fixture filing? 9-102(a)(40) and (41) define a fixture filing as “the filing of a financing statement covering goods that are or are to become fixtures and satisfying Section 9-502(a) and (b). The term includes the filing of a financing statement covering goods of a transmitting utility, which are or are to become fixtures. Fixtures are defined as goods that have become so related to particular real property that an interest in them arises under real property law.” What is a Transmitting Utility? A Transmitting utility may be filed under the provision of 810 ILCS 5/9-102 (a) (80), if it meets the definition of a transmitting utility. How many transactions may I submit on a UCC-3 Amendment? Under the Rule Chapter 14 Sec. 180.12 e), only one amendment type per from will be accepted. A separate fee must be submitted with each amendment form tendered.

EL ARGUMENTO UCC

The UCC-1 Argument A. UCC-1 is the Best Gift you could ever give for you and your family, file today! Today the majority of Americans pay taxes because when they get a job their employer requests that they fill out either: Internal Revenue Service Form W-2, Form W-4, or Form 1099, which, as a direct result, withholds taxes from their paychecks for their labor. [The majority doesn’t have a clue as to why they are paying these taxes in the first place.] It has been affirmed that labor is a fundamental, unalienable right , protected by the United States Constitution. This fundamental right is not supposed to be taxed. It is presumed that everyone, is expected to know the law. It has been long held that, ignorance of the Law is not an excuse or a defense. The well established maxim that: “He who falls to assert his rights – HAS NONE!”, unequivocally establishes that just as a closed mouth never gets fed, “a matter must be expressed to be resolved.” When it comes to dealing with lawyers, government, and the Internal Revenue Service (which is not an agency of the United States Government, but a private foreign-owned corporation) withholding and keeping knowledge from the people is nothing new. It is a common business tactic that has been going on from the beginning of its inception. It will, most likely continue as long as we rely upon lawyers and government to do that which we ourselves should be doing. In order to find the answer as to why your labor is being taxed, when the Constitution says it is not supposed to be, It is necessary to understand how government exists and operates. To accomplish this requires a quick review back in history to the time of the War Between the States. The People of this Nation lost their true Republican form of government. On March 27, 1861 seven southern States walked out of Congress leaving the entire legislative Branch of Government without quorum. The Congress of the Constitution was dissolved for inability to disband or re-convene. The Republican form of Government, which the People were guaranteed – ceased to exist. Out of necessity to operate the Government, President Lincoln issued Executive Order No. 2. in April 1861, reconvening the Congress at gunpoint in Executive, emergency, martial-law-rule jurisdiction. Since that time there has been no “’de jure” (sanctioned by law) Congress. Everything functions under “color of law” (the appearance or semblance, without substance, of legal right.) Through Executive Orders under authority of the War Powers, (ie emergency, ie law of necessity) the “law of necessity” means no law whatsoever, as per such maxims of law as: “Necessity knows no law” [(the law of forbidding killing is voided when done in self-defense)]. “In time of war laws are silent.” Cicero. To establish the underlying debt of the Government to the Bankers, to create corporate entities that are legally subject to the jurisdiction which they exist, and to create the jurisdiction itself correctly, the so-called (fraudulent and unratified) Fourteenth Amendment was proclaimed and passed in 1868. This was a cestui que trust (operation in law) incorporated in a military, private, International, commercial, de facto jurisdiction created by, and belonging to, the Money Power, existing within the emergency of the War Powers, the only operational jurisdiction since the dissolution of Congress in 1861. Through the 14th Amendment, an artificial person-corporate entity-franchise entitled “citizen of the United States” was born into private, corporate limited liability. Section 4 of the 14th Amendment states: “The validity of the Public Debt of the United States (to the Bankers) … shall not be questioned.” Within the above-referenced private jurisdiction of the International Bankers , the private and foreign owned “Congress” formed a corporation, commercial agency, and Government for the “District of Columbia” on February 21, 1871, Chapter 62, 16 Stat. 419. This corporation was reorganized June 11, 1878, Chapter 180, 20 Stat. 102, and re-named “United States Government.” This corporation privately trade marked the names: “United States,” “US,” “US,” “USA,” “USA” and “America.” When the United States declared itself a municipal corporation, it also created what is known as a cestui que trust to function under by implementing the Federal Constitution of 1871, and incorporating the previous United States Constitutions of 1787 and 1791 as amended, as by-laws. Naturally, as the grantor of the trust, this empowered the United States Government to change the terms of the trust at will. As evidenced under the Federal Constitution of 1871, the 14th Amendment, the People of the United States, without their consent, were declared “Citizens” and granted “Civil Rights.” These so-called civil rights are nothing more than mere privileges. Privileges which government licenses, regulates, and can re-interpret to suit it’s purposes at any time for any reason. The Federal Corporate Government also conveniently somehow forgot to disclose to the People that the term “Citizen” with which they have made every living and breathing inhabitant a “subject”, was defined in law as a “Vessel” engaged in commerce. In 1912, when the bonds, that were keeping the US Government afloat, and, were owned by the Bankers, came due, the Bankers refused to re-finance the debt, and the colorable, martial-law-rule Congress was compelled to pass, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. This Act surrendered constitutional authority to create, control, and manage the entire money supply of the United States to a handful of private, mostly-foreign bankers. This placed exclusive creation and control of the money within the private, commercial, foreign, and military jurisdiction of 1861, into corporate limited liability. America converted from United States Notes to Federal Reserve Notes, beginning with the passage of The Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Federal Reserve Banks were incorporated in 1914, and, in 1916, began to circulate their private, corporate Federal Reserve Notes as “money” alongside the nations “de jure” currency, the United States Notes. Whereas United States Notes were actually warehouse receipts for deposits of gold and silver in a warehouse (bank), thus representing wealth (substance, portable land; the money of sovereigns), the new flat money (Federal Reserve Notes) amounted to “bills for that which was yet to be paid,” ie for what was owed! For the new “benefit” of being able to carry around US Government debt instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) in our wallets instead of Gold Certificates or Silver Certificates, we agreed to redeem the newly issued Federal Reserve Notes in gold and also to pay interest for their use in gold ONLY! Essentially, the Fed issued paper with pretty green ink on it and we agreed to give them gold in exchange for the “privilege” of using it. Such was the bargain. Through paying interest to the Federal Reserve Corporation in gold, the US Treasury became progressively depleted of its gold. America’s gold certificates, coin, and bullion were continually shipped off to the coffers of various European Banks and Power Elite. In 1933, when the Treasury was drained and the debt was larger than ever (a fina ncial condition known as “Insolvency”), President Roosevelt proclaimed the bankruptcy of the United States. Every 14th Amendment “citizen of the United States” was pledged as an asset to finance the Chapter 11 re-organization expenses and pay interest in perpetuity to the CREDITORS (Federal Reserve Bankers) and the “national debt”, (“which shall not be questioned”). On March 9, 1933, Congress passed the Amendatory Act (also known as the Emergency Banking Relief Act) to the Trading with the Enemy Act (originally passed on October 6, 1917) at a time when the United States was not in a shooting war with any foreign foe and included the People of the United States as the enemy. At the conference of Governors held on March 6, 1933, the Governors of the 48 States of the Union accommodated the Federal Bankruptcy of the United States Corporation by pledging the faith and credit of their State to the aid of the National Government. Senate Document 43 of the 73rd Congress, 1st Session (1933) did declare that ownership of ALL PROPERTY is in the STATE and individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of government, ie law amounting to “mere-user” only; and individual use of all property is subordinate to the necessities of the United States Government. Under House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, Senate Report No. 93549, and Executive Orders 6072, 6012 and 6246, the Congress and President Roosevelt officially declared bankruptcy of the United States Government. | Regardless of the cause or reason, what many American’s either do not understand and/or have failed to seriously grasp, is that by the use of Federal Reserve Notes; (which Is not Constitutional Money defined under Article I Section 10 of the United States Constitution), the People of the United States since 1933, have not had any Constitutionally lawful way to pay their debts. They therefore have not had any way to buy or own property. The People, for the benefits granted to them by a bankrupt corporate Government, discharge their debts with limited liability using Federal Reserve Notes. They have surrendered, by way of an unconscionable contract, their individual Rights under the Constitution, in exchange for mere privileges! A review of countless United States Supreme Court decisions since the 1938, landmark case, Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, (304 US 64-92) clearly establishes that only the State has Constitutional Rights, not the People. The People have been pledged to the bankruptcy of 1933. The federal law administered in and by the United States is the private commercial “law” of the CREDITORS. That, due to the bankruptcy, every “citizen of the United States” is pledged as an asset to support the bankruptcy, must work to pay the insurance premiums on the underwriting necessary to keep the bankrupt government in operation under Chapter II Bankruptcy (Reorganization). That upon the declared Bankruptcy, Americans could operate and function only through their corporate colored, State created, ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME, – that has no access to sovereignty, substance, rights, and standing in law. The Supreme Court also held the “general (Universal) common law” no longer is accessible and in operation in the federal courts based on the 1933, bankruptcy, which placed everything into the realm of private, colorable law merchant of the Federal Reserve CREDITORS. To take this to a different level and not only explain why you pay taxes, but also why you do not own the house you live in, the car you drive, or own anything else you think you’ve bought and paid for etc. The State Government and its CREDITORS own It all. If you think you own your home just because you believe you paid it using those Federal Reserve Notes, just like everything else you possess by permission of Government, simply stop paying your taxes, (user-fees), (licenses) and see just how long Government and the CREDITORS allow you to keep it before they come to take it away from you. How can all this really be? Why haven’t you been told all of this before now? Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Every man is deemed (required) to know the law. Government expects you to know the law, and holds you fully accountable for doing so. Ignoring these facts will not protect you. The majority of American’s have been given a Public Education to teach them only what the Public, ie government (CREDITORS) wants them to know. It is and always has been each individuals personal responsibility, duty and obligation to learn and know the law. What this breaks down to is this: Back in 1933, when the United States went into bankruptcy because it could no longer pay its debts it pledged the American People themselves without their consent as the asset to keep the government afloat and operating. Because government no longer had any way to pay its debts with substance, was bankrupt, it lost its sovereignty and standing in law. Outside and separate from Constitutional Government, to continue to function and operate, it created an artificial world consisting of artificial entities. This was accomplished by taking everyone’s proper birth given name and creating what is called a “fiction in law,” by way of an acronym, ie a name written in ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS to interact with. A name written in ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS is not a sentient, flesh and blood human being. It is a corporation, fiction or deceased person. Government as well as all corporations, including the Internal Revenue Service cannot deal interact with you or interact with you via your proper name given you at birth, only through your ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME! Another little tidbit of knowledge which has been conveniently kept from the People is this; When the Several united States signed the treaty with Great Britain ending the Revolutionary War, it was a concession that ALL COMMERCE would be regulated and contracted through British Attorney’s known as Esquires only. This condition and concession still exists today. No attorney or lawyer in the United States of America has ever been “licensed” to practice law (they’ve exempted themselves) as they are a legal fiction “person” and only an “ADMITTED MEMBER” to practice in the private franchise club called the BAR (which is itself an acronym for the British or Barrister Aristocratic or Accreditation Regency), as such are un-registered foreign agents, and so they are traitors. Esquires (Unconstitutional Title of honor and nobility = Esquires), foreign non-citizens (aliens) who are specifically prohibited from ever holding any elected Public Office of trust whatsoever! Article I, Section 9, clause 8, states: “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatsoever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.” As a direct result, attorneys and lawyers cannot and do not represent you in your proper birth or given name. Attorneys and lawyers re-present corporations, artificial persons, and fictions in law – ONLY! What the majority in this country fail to recognize is this: because of the bankruptcy and having been pledged as an asset to the National Government’s debt, this makes all citizens DEBTORS under Chapter 11. DEBTORS in bankruptcy having lost their solvency – have NO RIGHTS nor STANDING IN LAW and are at the mercy of the CREDITORS. All courts today sit and operate as Non-Constitutional, Non-Article Three Legislative Tribunals administering the bankruptcy via their “statutes,” (“codes.”) All Courts are Title 11 Bankruptcy Courts where these statutes are, in reality, “commercial obligations” being applied for the “benefit” or “privilege” of discharging debts with limited liability of the Federal Reserve-monopoly, colorable-money Federal Reserve Notes (debt Instruments). This means every time you end up before a court – not only do you NOT have any standing in law to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, YOU HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS! Why? Because you are a DEBTOR under the bankruptcy and in addition to having contracted away your rights in exchange for benefits and privileges; you do not have one single shred of evidence to establish otherwise. In bankruptcy ONLY CREDITORS have rights! In a nutshell, as a DEBTOR, it is impossible for you to access Constitutional Rights, they are reduced to mere priv ileges which are licensed, regulated, and can be altered, amended and changed to meet whatever the particular or special needs of government for whatever whim. If taking away your home, your car, taxing your labor, or locking you up for violating any of the Sixty MILLION plus legislatively created DEBTOR codes and statutes they have on the books today happens to meet the needs of government – it really doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize who the loser will be! ——– B. IS THERE REALLY A REAL REMEDY? Is there really a real remedy to what has been done? Quite simply, Yes! There is one way and one way only you can protect yourself, your family, and property from this public obligation. The only unbreakable contract in existence in the world today is a UCC-I Financing Statement. [See Appendix Attachment No. I, Copy of UCC-I Financing Statement.] Only through filing a UCC-I Financing Statement and Accepting For Value your Birth Certificate and executing a lien upon the governmentally created ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME by you in your proper Birth given Name as the Secured Party, and listing anything and everything you own, will own, or possibly ever could own, as collateral in the Security Agreement, can you effectively and permanently remove yourself from the status of a DEBTOR to that of a CREDITOR, and actually own property, have access to enforceable Constitutional Rights. By filing a UCC-I Financing Statement, you become an actual CREDITOR with standing in law and acquire the ability to stake a claim upon which relief can be granted, and not have the fruits of your labor taxed Simply following up the UCC-I Financing Statement with a Public Notice and Declaration/Depositum Declaration, can you, as a CREDITOR, acquire and access actual Original Jurisdiction Constitutional rights, that can be enforced. Without a UCC-I Financing Statement, everything you have is pledged and owned by the State. You merely are the user of the property and must use that property in strict compliance with all the rules and regulations established by the State. If acquiring actual Original Jurisdiction Constitutional Rights and having the ability to own property free from government controls, and the ability to earn a living without taxation – interests you, you have nothing to lose and everything to gain by executing that document without delay! Only through filing a UCC-I Financing Statement and Security Agreement and then executing a Public Notice and Declaration/Depositum Declaration is it possible for anyone to legally access Constitutional Rights. To try and break this down even further: Few people truly understand the words “slave and slavery.” The biggest benefit in filing a UCC-I Financing Statement is that you will no longer be a slave. The fact is, most dictionaries fail to provide an accurate definition of the words “slave and slavery.” Even Webster’s 1828 edition of the English language dictionary fails in its attempt to define the true meaning of the word “slavery”: “Slave: a person who is wholly subject to the will of another.” Slavery is not a matter of being totally 100% subject to the will of another. Any person who is to any degree Involuntarily subject to the will of another, is still a slave. There are no degrees of slavery. The second part of the 2nd definition of slave provided by Webster’s 1828 Edition is: “One who surrenders himself to any power whatsoever,” which is closer to the real point. The Uniform Commercial Code [UCC] governs ALL commercial transactions in the United States. Any “person” including government corporations, agencies, etc. involved in the “sales of goods, commercial paper, bank deposits and collections, letters of credit, bulk transfer, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, investment securities, and secured transactions” is governed by the UCC. The A form of Uniform Commercial Code is adopted by all States. To comply with the Uniform Commercial Code in your state, a UCC-I Financing Statement must be filed with the Secretary of State, by any “person” who makes a claim against any other “person” in the area of commerce. All government agencies, (city, county, state and federal), operate in commerce and all of them, including the Internal Revenue Service, are private corporations. All Courts operate in commerce. All Banks operate in commerce. All “Corporations operate in commerce and all of these “entities” exist financially because WE are their collateral. They borrow on our “credit.” At one time, our currency was backed by or given substance by gold or silver. It has been thought by many, since the United States took the substance of gold and silver away, that Federal Reserve Notes were simply worthless paper, backed by nothing at all. That is not correct! Today, real people, United States Citizen’s, you, me, your children, etc. back Federal Reserve Notes, much the same way that gold and silver did in the past. In other words, the living, breathing people guarantee or provide the substance for ALL money that is created. The Federal Reserve Bank clearly states: “Federal Reserve Notes are backed by the Full faith and credit of the American People.” Blind Faith sets forth that YOU trust THEM. Who? None other than the Federal Reserve! Credit means something is due you! The Federal Reserve uses our credit to create ALL money. All of the money created belongs to the American People and the deceit of the Public and private corporations is so complete, they create it, charge it to us as a debt and then tack interest to it on top of that How did the American People become collateral for the debt instruments known as Federal Reserve Notes? It was given to the Federal Reserve by a corporation called the United States, the very same corporation that created the Federal Reserve. As discussed previously, in 1933, when President Roosevelt declared a national emergency because the United States could no longer pay its debts. At least that was the spin given to the American People. All of the subsidiary States agreed to support the declared bankruptcy by “pledging” the energy of their “citizens.” Their assets consisted only of State Citizens. The States in turn used the Birth Certificates to pledge the State Citizen as collateral to keep Government afloat. That is how the American People became collateral for the Federal Reserve Notes and so-called debts. The American People became warehouse receipts, like a warehouse full of any type of valuable goods. All of this, however, was a major fraud. Neither the Internal Revenue Service nor any other entity like Government files a UCC-I Financing Statement Into the Commercial Registry with the Secretary of State. If they did, they would instantly become subject to all the regulations of the Uniform Commercial Code. The Internal Revenue Service has done very nicely by bluffing and intimidation, as all others mentioned, by operating under “Public Policy” where there is in reality “No Law” at all! The State Citizen is drawn “into commerce” when their Birth Certificate is registered and sent to the Commerce Department in Washington, DC This is where the American People became warehouse receipts upon which all of the money printed and circulated is created and guaranteed. In short, the American People became the collateral for all debts. They “The People” allegedly are “Government” property! Government is a “fiction” and an artificial person and deals with us as a fiction or artificial persons only as stated before. To take this still to another level, let’s use an example to explain and use the name of John Henry: Smith. When John Henry: Smith was born, his parents gave him the Christian name of John Henry and he shared the name of Smith with all the other members of his family. He was born a living, breathing being. When his Birth Certificate was sent to the Department of Commerce, it was registered and the Government, because it was bankrupt, turned his “real name” into a fiction. His new fictional name became JOHN H. SMITH or John H. Smith. His ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS NAME was registered as a corporation at the Puerto Rico Department of State Corporations (Departamento de Estado – Division de Corporaciones) PO BOX 3271, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO, 00904-3271, making him liable for taxes. He is now a fiction or artificial person; a non-living, non-breathing “person.” It is a “strawman” (Lat. stramineus homo) or “fiction” which government brings all its so-called charges against and NEVER against the real person. Just like “yours,” his driver’s license now reads JOHN H. SMITH or John H. Smith. When he signs a 1040 Tax Form, he dutifully fills out the form as John H. Smith and then signs his name “under penalty of perjury, ” thereby admitting he will be responsible for all the taxes of John H. Smith, a fiction in law, corporation. Look at your drivers license and see who it is issued to. How can government use a form of our name and turn it into a fiction (corporation) without our permission? They can’t, we sign our name to all of their forms, which is purely voluntary “permission-in-ignorance.” In short, we do it to ourselves! However, for those who wish to control and own this fiction and prohibit government corporations, including the Internal Revenue Service from making so- called charges against it, a remedy is available: to do this by executing a UCC- 1 Financing Statement! John Henry, Smith would simply do what Government and the Internal Revenue Service does not do: File your UCC-1 Financing Statement into the Commercial Registry with the Secretary of State and claim EVERYTHING related to JOHN H. SMITH or any derivative name, corporate fiction; ie: the Birth Certificate and Social Security Card and Number. The living, breathing, real person then owns and controls the fictitious entity, including all contracts related to the Birth Certificate and Social Security Number. Thusly, the real John H. Smith, secures all rights, interest and title in the fictitious entity. Now, government and the Internal Revenue Service has to deal with John Henry: Smith but they cannot!, because he is no longer subject to government control. Every living breathing person has both a Social Security Card and an Employer Identification Number (yes, there are exceptions). The Internal Revenue Service calls the Social Security Number our Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). Never do they mention our Employer Identification Number (EIN). What, “you are not an employer, so you do not have an EIN?” <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>But wait.</span> Pero espera.</span> Yes you do! We are all employers and every one of us has an EIN. If you apply for a new Social Security Card (not a new number), on the backside of the card written In Red is your Employer Identification Number. Government workers are all employees. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM! Government employees work for us!, we are their employer! That is why, when you read the Tax Code to find the definition of “employee,” under Title 26 United States Code, at Section 3401(c), the term “employee” specifically includes officers and employees, whether elected or appointed, of the United States, a State (Federal State), Territory, or any other political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. EVERY ONE OF THEM ARE EMPLOYEES – THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE THE EMPLOYER. Write to the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the Capital of the State where you were born and request a copy of your Birth Certificate. REQUEST THE LONG FORM (Certified Copy). Never mind that you have a copy right now. More likely than not it came from the County in which you were born. The number assigned to your Birth Certificate by the Vital Statistics Office is of primary importance when executing your UCC-I Financing Statement. ======= C. RELIEF FROM TAXES AND ALL OTHER COMMERCIAL OBLIGATIONS ARE AS SIMPLE AS A UCC-I FILING AND COMMERCIAL PROCESS AWAY! What can filing a UCC-I Financing Statement do for you besides everything described thus far? Let’s throw a few more examples onto the table to explain. As previously stated, the only real thing in the United States, is the American People. Corporations are fictions – DEAD ENTITIES! Let’s use a fiction called GENERAL MOTORS for our explanation. Since the inception of GENERAL MOTORS which was originally created by another corporate fiction we call government, they have borrowed into existence countless billions of Federal Reserve Notes. Today GENERAL MOTORS proudly calls themselves one of the largest corporations (a fiction) in the world! It is taught that stockholders of GENERAL MOTORS “own” GENERAL MOTORS. The real truth is the American People own everything produced by GENERAL MOTORS – free and clear. Isn’t it interesting this fiction charges us the American People for what already belongs to us – and then to add more insult to injury – they tack on a little interest to boot! When Internal Revenue sends a letter or Notice to the fiction JOHN H. SMITH and says “Our records indicate you owe $15,000.00,” John Henry: Smith, who has filed a UCC-I Financing Statement now has multiple options as to how he chooses to deal with this matter. John Henry: Smith knows full well he must respond to the presentment he’s just received from Internal Revenue in a timely manner. Depending on the Notice or Presentment he’s received he has either ten (10) days or thirty (30) days to respond. If he does not know what his time frame is to respond in is, to play it safe, it would be best for him to respond before the ten (10) days expires. John Henry: Smith knows that if he doesn’t respond, after the allotted time. If he fails to respond. Internal Revenue will enter a Default Judgment against him. Because he failed to object to the bill or ask any questions about it, having defaulted, the amount can lawfully be collected from him. John Henry: Smith also knows that you never argue the amount of deficiency in any tax case. If you are not required to file, you should not care whether they say you owe fifteen thousand dollars or one hundred and fifty thousand dollars. If you are not required to file, the amount doesn’t matter. You never argue the amount because that is a fact issue. The reason for this is, usually when you receive a Notice of Deficiency, it is for some unworldly amount. The Internal Revenue Service wants you to run in and argue about the amount. The minute you say “I don’t owe that much,” you have just agreed that you owed something and conceded jurisdiction. One of the proper methods is to immediately write the Internal Revenue Service a letter notifying them their Presentment is dishonored by you and you have reserved all rights under the Uniform Commercial Code at UCC 1-207. This normally should be all that is required. If this doesn’t make the matter disappear then John Henry: Smith can exercise option No. 2 and can “Accept the $15,000.00 for Value” and the so-called debt is extinguished. Wh y? How Is that possible? Because every “real” American has a corresponding offsetting “credit” for all debt claimed against his Strawman or fiction. Real folks all across America are filing UCC-I Financing Statements and ridding themselves of the debt and fraud of this beast system called by many as government and their created fictions. It has been established, “Lawyers and Attorneys have written well over Sixty Million Codes and Statutes to confound and confuse the American People and enslave them.” None of these Codes or Statutes apply to any living, breathing, people who claim their heritage through what God has preserved. The fact that many Americans are filing UCC-I Financing Statements and commercially liberating themselves has caused major alarms to go off with Government and the CREDITORS. In an attempt to slow down this mass exodus, the Secretary of State’s Offices after July 1, 2001, will accept no more signature filings. This means, if you, as a flesh and blood human being, have not filed your UCC-I Financing Statement before July 1 2001, your ability to remove yourself from that status of a DEBTOR with mere privileges to the status of a CREDITOR with enforceable Rights, is subject to become considerably more difficult to achieve. Therefore, he who hesitates, is lost – just as the old saying goes: “Snooze, you lose!” After filing your UCC-I Financing Statement, it can be used by the real person to obtain what is known as a “Security Interest” in the fiction (aka Strawman) whom the Internal Revenue Service uses to force, intimidate, threaten and compel the real flesh and blood person to pay what are called taxes. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a Financing Statement is used under Article IX to reflect a Public Record that there is a Security Interest or claim to the goods in question to secure a debt. The Financing Statement is filed by the Security Holder (real person) with the Secretary of State, or similar public body, and as a result becomes Public Record. As a party with ownership of the fiction or (Strawman), you become the Secured Party with ALL RIGHTS, INTEREST, AND TITLE in the fiction’s Birth Certificate, Social Security Number, Driver’s License, Automobile, Certificates of Title, Credit Cards, Loans, Property, Taxes, etc., etc.! So what did it cost the moneychangers to enslave the American People? <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Nothing!</span> ¡Nada!</span> The same is true for freedom; “For thus saith the Lord, Ye have sold yourselves for naught (nothing), and ye shall be redeemed without money.” Isaiah 52nd Chapter, 4th verse 1. 1) BAIT and SWITCH vs. CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE Every contract consists of both an offer and acceptance. In every contract there is an Offeror and acceptor. The offer being the tale and the acceptor the head. Under contract law, title to whatever is offered transfers instantaneously upon acceptance, not upon payment like many seem to think. Payment, a consideration, is merely incidental. Attorney’s and Lawyers who write every contract used by corporations, including Government Corporations, know that the acceptor of the contract is in charge or what is known as the Holder in Due Course. Holder in Due Course is defined as: “Title Holder of the contract.” Thus, whenever you see any advertisement in the paper by a New Car Dealer offering you a new car at a certain price, and you’re attracted by what is offered, you run right down to the car dealer and without knowing it become the victim of the oldest game of bait and switch in existence! Here is how the real shakedown works: After you settle on the car with all it’s options and the price with the dealership, you then sign your name to a contract, which in doing so, makes you the Offeror and the dealership the acceptor of that offer. It works the same identical way in every retail sale in the country, including Real Estate. You lose, because the seller is the Holder of the contract and in charge. That is the reason why you only get a carbon or photocopy of the contract. They keep the original contract and original signatures and obediently enter the property into commerce as the lawyers intended. It is a diabolical scheme! Whenever a Government Corporation sends you a letter, indictment or anything else charging that you violated some statute or code or that you owe some sort of tax or fine, think of that as an offer by the Government. For example: let’s say you receive a bill for property taxes. This is an offer by the tax office just like the new car dealer. There are several options that you have when you get the bill. The number one option which most people take is to write out a check for the amount due. A check of course, is a debt instrument. Thus you are making a counter-offer to the tax collector, which they of course will accept, but the debt HAS NOT been extinguished. It is simply added to the PUBLIC DEBT. Once again, you have become the victim of a bait and switch! Lets use the same example as we’ve previously discussed and this time, lets use a different tactic. Remember that the acceptor is in charge. This time lets simply Accept the “tax bill” for Value with the “right of chargeback.” When you examine your property tax bill, you find out it is made out to a name (purportedly yours) in all capital letters. Which as you’ve already discovered is not you! It is a fiction created by the government. If you’ve done your homework, you’ve obtained a certified copy of your Birth Certificate from the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State where you were born and have filed your UCC-I Financing Statement. Now you own all rights, title and interest in that all capital letter name character, including ALL contracts, mortgages and pledges. You’re now in charge of anything you want to do with the fiction. It works the same way with Internal Revenue Service. They send the fiction a “tax bill” for $20,000.00. You as the owner of the fiction, Accept their presentment for Value, place a value of $20,000,000.00, for example on it and notify whoever sent you the presentment that you now want a copy of their fiduciary tax return. You can request this because all of the money created uses your credit/labor as collateral. The amount you use is up to you. Only you can personally determine what value to place upon this trespass and violation of your property. 2) ADVANTAGES OF UTILIZING THE “AFFIDAVIT DENYING EXISTENCE OF CORPORATION!” The words “Specific Negative Averment” which is what an “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” really amounts to, are taken verbatim out of Rule 9(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which in the Rule provides and describes exactly how to challenge corporate existence solvency, and capacity to sue and be sued. The term “Averment” comes from the root word “aver”: to declare or assert; to set out distinctly and formally; to allege. An averment is a positive declaration or affirmation of fact, especially an allegation. It is submitted in the form of an affidavit so as to invoke the superior credibility and power that comes with having unlimited commercial liability. As an honest, forthright, conscientious, sentient being you have nothing to hide or fear and so can state your position openly and fully by affidavit. Others with hidden agendas and skeletons in the closet need to hide behind their corporate mothers’ skirts of only limited liability. They are too terrified of being held personally accountable for anything to step up to the commercial plate and swear out an affidavit stating anything. Executing the “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” requires the receiving/served party to respond by affidavit, both written in longhand in red ink and notarized in red ink and sent to you via the Notary Public, and further requires that they prove: a) All of the various fictitious, non-existent, undefined assemblages of all-capital-letters, eg “INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,” etc. legally exist, ie are solvent, have standing in law, and can be present in a court; and b) Each has a proven contractual nexus with all the others, including the artificial person represented by the corrupted, all-capital-letter version of your true name. Failure to accomplish the above in the manner prescribed in the affidavit establishes on the record his/her/their confession and consent of judgment that none of those entities exist. That there is no enforceable contract. You are not required to become involved in an imaginary dispute between non-existent entities! It is crucial to realize, that the only way we can survive as a civilization is to cause truth to prevail. If history be our teacher, since it is so often stated: “History repeats itself and those who fail to learn from History, are doomed to repeat it,” is forever present. Any society functioning on lies, ie data contrary to the way things actually are and function, will fail. As It is, mankind on this planet is hell bent for dissolution and disappearance as a living species. This is no exaggeration. When thoughts, words, and deeds of billions of people are increasingly wrong, erroneous, and false, the natural cause/effect consequences of such futile efforts to violate the laws of existence self-function to assert their own integrity. All that is false and contrary to the truth of man’s basic nature and the nature of life eventually self-destructs as a consequence. Establishing truth in situations requires exposing the actual nature of everything that is proffered. The entire system thrives and ravages the world because people accept the surface appearance of things at face value without looking for the underlying cause and exposing the truth of the matter so it can be recognized and understood. Reality’s game is “truth or consequences.” The consequence of acting contrary to truth begets ruin It is therefore essential to neutralize both of the ways people are damaged by the systematic war being waged against them by their so-called “Public Servants”: the commercial process and the “legitimacy” in the Law of Nations of War as a valid activity of nation States. In certain circumstances, in compliment and simultaneously with the Affidavit Denying. existence of Corporation, the “Accepted For Value” UCC Commercial Process and whatever other affidavits might be deployed, the “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” is essential to neutralize the commercial aspect of the war, and the Affidavit, “Bill of Peace” is used to expose the naked aggression of the systematic war being waged under color of law. Anyone who wants to deal with you who will “NOT COME CLEAN” and be honest, sincere, and well intentioned, is self-confessing to be: a) Disregarding the truth and acting on lies, deceit, bad faith, and absence of full disclosure, and thereby announcing to you by their actions (and failures to act) that they are an aggressor, criminal con artist with no authority, and an enemy. Since no contract can be formed without genuine agreement – free consent and mutual meeting of the minds based on full disclosure, good faith, and truth no contract can result from your interaction with them other than the criminal contract formed unilaterally by them via their assault upon you. This further voids all and every basis upon which to require you to do anything they say or to have anything to do with them. b) Acting on their own, with no legitimate authority whatsoever, and are therefore personally_liable_in unlimited-commercial-liability capacity, ie NAKED! Upon your opponents failure to answer or rebut your Affidavit of Specific Negative Averment and Execute your Bill of Peace a Notice of Default and Stipulation is thereby executed, served upon them and recorded in the Public Record. 3) ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE? Once the “real, live, flesh and blood- Individual has filed a UCC-I Financing Statement with Security Agreement in place and taking “all rights, title and interest” in the ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS FICTION, ASSEMBLAGE, ARTIFICIAL PERSON (that very so-called name may be spelled with a first name, middle initial and last name) or “Strawman/Woman” when a “person (agency or other public or private corporation)” submits a letter or form suggesting that you (when its really the fiction) are being charged with a debt, taxes or whatever, a personalized letter is sent to the person who signed the letter or form or a person responsible for the letter or form being sent to the fiction. That letter explains that you (the real deal) “Accept the Charge for Value.” This basically tells them you hold title to the FICTION and anything .connected to the FICTION, it gives them NOTICE that they have committed a “Trespass against your property … Your Rights!” It sets in stone that you are “the Holder-in-Due-Co urse.” This is a banking/securities term and requires a quick refresher definition: “In every contract there must be an offer, acceptance and a consideration. Corporations specialize in bait-and-switch tactics to protect themselves in every contractual arrangement. Such as, when you see a home you like, the real estate agency may have “offered” the home for sale through various advertisements. This is an offer. You look at the home and like it and the price is right. You tell the real estate agent “Yes, I’ll take it ! “At that point you have become the acceptor of the contract and of course the home and price is the consideration. From a legal standpoint, this contract Is completed. The offer, acceptance and consideration are completed right then. The acceptor is the ‘one “in charge.” That at the moment, could be you. Then comes the old switch-a-roo! Now is when the bait-and-switch goes down. The real estate agent (unwittingly, as though ignorance of the law is any excuse or defense) then requires you to fill out a FORM in which you make an Offer and They the Seller become the Acceptor! The bait and switch is complete. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>That simple.</span> Eso es simple.</span> You have now “voluntarily” become a DEBTOR -“forever,” even if you paid cash for the place or latter pay of the mortgage. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why?</span> ¿Por qué?</span> Why can’t you pay it off? YOU CANNOT EXTINGUISH DEBTS WITH A DEBT INSTRUMENT (Ie FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES)! -<[Debt + Debt ? Debt; Credit + Credit ? Credit, neither satisfy or cancel the obligation of payment and do not constitute payment!]&Mac221;-.” You have voluntarily made someone else the Holder in Due Course of the property. They accepted the instrument (contract) FOR VALUE. They now own the property. “All parts of the contract, including the deed are now “recorded in the property records. Look at your deed. It will have the, “FICTIONS” written in all capital letters. All we really do is add to the so-called National Debt whenever you-pay those taxes and make that counteroffer, with the debt, however, not changing and remaining the same whenever you purchase anything in this manner. So when you receive a Notice of Property-taxes on your home, the taxing authority is really making you an “offer.” When you pay the taxes you are inking a counter-offer, because your payment will not extinguish the debt or cancel it out. They will accept your counter-offer, however, but the debt will still be there. By the way, the Notice of Property Tax due will be made out to your FICTION! Keep these things in mind when you purchase ‘a hone, land, auto, “etc. You make the contract.! Make the seller the Offeror and yourself (the real person with your; name spelled correctly) the acceptor of the offer. This puts you officially in charge! Make gold and/or silver a part of the consideration to extinguish the debt. You will be the Holder in Due Course. YOU keep the original contract and give the Offeror a copy. Do not record-the contract unless you want to give up the allodial title to the property. Recordings is not required and the original, contract by itself is all you need to prove and establish ownership. Now with this explanation covered, lets move to the person who wrote the letter charging that you owed something. After filing the UCC-1 Financing Statement and acquiring a Certified copy of it with Security Agreement, you are now the Holder in Due Course of the property known as the FICTION or (Strawman) and any contract associated with him or her! Think of the letter as an OFFER and rather than making a counter-offer by paying, you now Accept the offer for Value. By Accepting’ for Value, you are saying, “I am the Holder in Due Course” and … because you have become the ACCEPTOR of the offer, guess Who is in charge? You are in charge and the Offeror has trespassed upon you and your PROPERTY! As the Secured Party or owner of the PROPERTY and Holder in Due Course, you now can set a value on the trespass. So if the Offeror has made the charge that your PROPERTY owes $25,000.00, you can Accept the offer For Value and set a value on it literally for any amount you choose! For discussion purposes, let’s put a value on it for $250,000.00. You are going to tell this person to charge the $250,000.00, to your Personal Treasury Account and provide your Employer Identification number for the Account Number to be charged. This will be directed to the Secretary of the Treasury in Washington, DC The person has three days in under the Truth-in-Lending-Act to do what has been ordered. In addition, you are going to request that this person send you his/her Fiduciary Tax Return, which would show they have filed and paid taxes on the $250,000.00. They won’t respond, so ten (10) days later you send a Second Request and at the same time send a letter and a Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange ordering the Secretary to “Charge Back” the $250,000.00, in which the Secretary will be directed to credit the “other side” of his ledger for use by the Republic. When enough folks do this Re-Public – credits will eventually be in excess of the Public Sides Debits! All of this is done in accordance with Uniform Commercial Code, UCC-3-419 and the Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange In accord with House Joint Resolution (HJR-192) and will discharge the Public Debt. The Secretary of the Treasury also only has three (3) days to complete his side of this Order. For he also is required to operate within the Banking Regulation Z, 72 Hour period regulation guideline governing retail agreements, as codified at: 15 USC §§ 1601 et seq. Basically you are done. By Accepting everything the (government or any corporation) brings your way for Value – there is no argument – no fight. Remember everything is a “charge” from every Government corporation or so called private corporation. A “Charge” is basically to IMPOSE a burden, duty, obligation, or lien. In criminal law, to “charge” is to indict or formally accuse. Everything centers around a DEBTOR being charged and the CREDITOR making the accusation. To IMPOSE means to levy ‘or exact, to lay as a burden, tax, duty or charge. Remember that ALL CHARGES are brought forth against a FICTION and if you (the real deal) owns all rights, title and interest in the FICTION, ALL CHARGES CAN BE DISCHARGED by you, the real person, on the other side of being “charged,” which is all a court of equity can do (all courts are courts of equity – bankruptcy), is to make a “claim.” A claim means a demand as one’s own or as one’s right. A FICTION, ie, a public or private corporation, cannot make a claim against a real person. Only a real person can make a claim against a real person Corporations are FICTIONS and have no right to make claims. ———- D. NOW YOU CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE BENEFITS OF UCC-1 FINANCING STATEMENT AND HAVING THE SECURITY AND PROTECTION OF AN UNBEATABLE SECURITY AGREEMENT IN PLACE TO PROTECT YOU, YOUR FAMILY, POSSESSIONS, PROPERTY AND WAGES. SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY offers one of the most comprehensive Security Agreements available today. This Security Agreement* is NON-DISCHARGEABLE by ANY Title II Bankruptcy Court, and is fully 100% transferable to any Heir or Assign. This Security Agreement carries a fully functionable Fidelity Bond and Indemnity Clause. The collateral covered is as extensive of coverage available! SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY offers UCC-I Forms, Special Notices, Acceptance for Value Commercial Process Assistance, personalized service with processing, copying, typing, filing, Certified Document Custodian Service and Assistance, Process of Service Services in ALL STATES regardless where, you live SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY provides prompt professional support services for all your COMMERCIAL affairs and needs. SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY’S PROFESSIONAL PROCESS CONSULTANTS provide valuable and accurate information for educational enlightenment, and enrichment to empower you with “the knowledge” and assurance that in every commercial matter, the proceedings transpire only under the following terms and conditions: 1. ALL participants must be limited-liability corporations (persons, artificial persons) 2. Proceedings occur only with the express consent of all involved persons; 3. Each corporation must prove solvency in order to go to court; 4. Each corporation, as a limited liability person, must be insured and bonded (underwritten) to provide the stakes at risk in the dispute that are subject to claim in the event of losing the matter; 5. Your “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” and, “Bill of Peace” are processed and serviced upon the parties with Notice that: “NO” summary or equity proceeding can conclude with any genuine issues of material fact in dispute: 6. No civil proceeding can commence until all criminal elements are exposed and resolved; and, 7. No facts exist to be set Into evidence or rendered subject to dispute until all the underlying principles of issue in dispute have been clarified SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY provides full Secretarial, Research, and other professional support services at a reasonable rate. To maintain and prevail against any summary or equity proceeding (which is all there is today in all of the system’s colorable, general-equity, privately owned, limited-liability, military, bankruptcy courts). Other Specialized Services include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Besides a variety of documents, photocopying, mailing, filing, recording, executing/processing/stamping all paperwork “ACCEPTED FOR VALUE,” Notary Services for certification of your Unlimited Commercial Liability true, correct, and complete, all filing certified filed in the Commercial Claim Registry; 2. Complete Assistance with credentials properly prepared In your true name (In upper-and-lower-case letters) to give everyone Notice of your “Unlimited Commercial Liability.” 3. Whenever you experience any encounter with the system, assistance with immediate Notices to all parties of your unlimited Commercial Liability using seven (7) point affidavits, “for and on the record,” in which they are unequivocally noticed and told: a) You are a real, sentient, flesh-and-blood man or woman acting with unlimited Commercial Liability; b) That you are unlimited in undertaking all lawful and commercially just means to prot ect your life, rights, and property; c) You have no requirement to be bonded; d) You cannot be made subject to any limited liability proceeding without your consent, and you do not consent; e) You must exhaust your commercial remedies prior to accessing any tax-financed court system to resolve any possible dispute; f) Everything is under oath via affidavit certified and sworn on your unlimited commercial liability true, correct, complete, and everyone who is a party of the proceeding must be similarly sworn in or withdraw; g) Failure to Withdraw or be sworn in self-impeaches and self-invalidates all of that person’s testimony and credibility establishing fatal defects which terminates the case, and constitutes a mistrial and reversible error, so that anything done thereafter by such person constitutes legal and commercial violations which are actionable; h) The insurance policy and bond of every judge and attorney involved limit them to dealing only with limited-liability corporate persons and forecloses them from being able to deal in any manner with unlimited-liability being such as you; i) Since everyone in an equity or summary process must expressly consent to the proceedings and you expressly do not consent, they are barred from involving you in any such proceeding; j) If they insist, they are required to prove identify, authority, liability limits, and solvency by furnishing you a copy of their bond and insurance policy; k) They are foreclosed from undertaking any such proceeding with genuine issues of material fact unresolved, and the issue of your unlimited-commercial-liability standing is a fundamental issue inasmuch as it is legally impossible-for you to be in their court, or for any matters involving you to even commence, so long as they are in limited liability and you are under unlimited commercial liability; and, l) Since no civil matters can commence until all possible criminal elements are resolved, conduct and inquiry of everyone who might want to induce or compel you to participate if anything you say can be used against you in any possible criminal proceeding, and if so to provide Notice that you exercise your right Secured by the Fifth Article In Amendment to remain silent. 1. Upon filing your UCC-I Financing Statement and Security Agreement and opening your Personal Treasury Account, SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY offers Tax Relief Assistance Programs by assisting you with the following documents: a) Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Request to establish/prove your (Strawman)/LEGAL FICTION has in fact been registered in Puerto Rico as a corporation; b) Public Notice and Declaration The Law Does Not Permit Impossibilities, to access Original Jurisdiction Constitutional Rights; c) Certified Demand for Proof of Jurisdiction; d) Affidavit in Support of Proof of Jurisdiction; e) Memorandum with Points and Authorities; f) Demand for “Employee” definition; g) Certificate/Affidavit of Non Revenue Taxable Occupation; h) Withholding Exemption Certificate; i) Demand for Full Payment of Wages and Cease Desist Withholding j) Demand for Refund for past three (2) years taxes erroneously paid; k) Accepted for Value and Exempt from Levy and Request of Employee Identification Number and Copy of 1099 OID; l) State Income Tax Affidavit for Relief from State Income Taxes in those States where applicable. Regrettably, performance is mandatory and failure to act immediately to remedy this matter is an unacceptable option or excuse. If actually owning that home you live in, the car you drive, and anything and everything else you possess, if having access to Original Jurisdiction Constitutional Rights and its protections and if having the full fruits of your labor interests you . <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>.</span> .</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>.</span> .</span> The time to act is now! Tomorrow may very well be too late!
UCC Overview: The Uniform Commercial Code governs commercial transactions. The code includes eleven articles covering a variety of areas such as sales, negotiable instruments, bank deposits and collections, and investment securities. Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), titled Secured Transactions, designates the office of the Secretary of State as the place for the filing and searching of secured transaction documents. Financing statements are filed as a public notice of a security interest in collateral. Record searches are requested to reveal financing statements filed against an organization or individual. For example, when a debtor (borrower) pledges collateral to obtain a loan, a UCC financing statement tells a secured party (creditor) whether others have financing statements against the same collateral. Filing a UCC financing statement is a protective measure because it provides a public notice to other parties. Debtors also benefit because the notice system helps them obtain business funding. Legally, it puts the creditor in the position of a secured creditor; and a perfected UCC financing statement may be acted on in case of default. In the event of a bankruptcy proceeding, the creditor will be in a better position to enforce its legal rights. The national UCC form must be used. Please submit two copies of the UCC form with a self-addressed stamped envelope. One to be filed at the filing office, and the second to be returned to you as an acknowledgement copy. What Are “In Lieu of” Financing Statements? In-Lieu-of, UCC Financing Statements are used to move a filing from a county filing office or another state filing jurisdiction. Guidelines for “In Lieu of” financing statements: The secured party completes a UCC-1 with current information for debtors, secured parties, and collateral. When using the national UCC-1 form follow the instructions on the reverse side of the UCC-1. In addition to the standard filing information, an In-Lieu-Of financing statement requires special wording in the collateral area of the UCC-1 form. Attaching Copies of Filings (the Recommended Solution): If copies of the previously filed financing statement are attached, include the following wording in the collateral area: “This financing statement is filed “in lieu of” a continuation statement. The financing statement attached remains effective.” Attach copies of the original financing statement and subsequent UCC-3 filings. How do I continue a UCC? You may submit a UCC-3 Amendment form as early as six month’s prior to the maturity date of the original filing. Be careful not to use the last day of the six-month window as your mailing date. The filing office will not stamp a received date on the document on non-business days such as weekends, holidays and emergency days. The earlier the Continuation is submitted in the six-month window the better chance it will be filed prior to the lapse or maturity of the UCC. Does the County Recorder, record Financing Statements that are fixture filings? <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Yes.</span> Sí.</span> Section 9-501(a)(1) states that except as “provided in subsection (b), if the local law of this State governs perfection of a security interest or agricultural lien, the office in which to file a financing statement to perfect the security interest or agricultural lien is: The office designated for the filing or recording of a record of a mortgage on the related real property, if: a. The collateral is as-extracted collateral or timber to be cut; or b. The financing statement is filed as a fixture filing and the collateral is goods that are or are to become fixtures and the financing statement is not filed as a fixture filing.” What information is required on a fixture filing? Section 9-502(b) and (c) state the filing requirements needed to perfect a fixture filing. What is the definition of a fixture filing? 9-102(a)(40) and (41) define a fixture filing as “the filing of a financing statement covering goods that are or are to become fixtures and satisfying Section 9-502(a) and (b). The term includes the filing of a financing statement covering goods of a transmitting utility, which are or are to become fixtures. Fixtures are defined as goods that have become so related to particular real property that an interest in them arises under real property law.” What is a Transmitting Utility? A Transmitting utility may be filed under the provision of 810 ILCS 5/9-102 (a) (80), if it meets the definition of a transmitting utility. How many transactions may I submit on a UCC-3 Amendment? Under the Rule Chapter 14 Sec. 180.12 e), only one amendment type per from will be accepted. A separate fee must be submitted with each amendment form tendered.
The UCC-1 Argument A. UCC-1 is the Best Gift you could ever give for you and your family, file today! Today the majority of Americans pay taxes because when they get a job their employer requests that they fill out either: Internal Revenue Service Form W-2, Form W-4, or Form 1099, which, as a direct result, withholds taxes from their paychecks for their labor. [The majority doesn’t have a clue as to why they are paying these taxes in the first place.] It has been affirmed that labor is a fundamental, unalienable right , protected by the United States Constitution. This fundamental right is not supposed to be taxed. It is presumed that everyone, is expected to know the law. It has been long held that, ignorance of the Law is not an excuse or a defense. The well established maxim that: “He who falls to assert his rights – HAS NONE!”, unequivocally establishes that just as a closed mouth never gets fed, “a matter must be expressed to be resolved.” When it comes to dealing with lawyers, government, and the Internal Revenue Service (which is not an agency of the United States Government, but a private foreign-owned corporation) withholding and keeping knowledge from the people is nothing new. It is a common business tactic that has been going on from the beginning of its inception. It will, most likely continue as long as we rely upon lawyers and government to do that which we ourselves should be doing. In order to find the answer as to why your labor is being taxed, when the Constitution says it is not supposed to be, It is necessary to understand how government exists and operates. To accomplish this requires a quick review back in history to the time of the War Between the States. The People of this Nation lost their true Republican form of government. On March 27, 1861 seven southern States walked out of Congress leaving the entire legislative Branch of Government without quorum. The Congress of the Constitution was dissolved for inability to disband or re-convene. The Republican form of Government, which the People were guaranteed – ceased to exist. Out of necessity to operate the Government, President Lincoln issued Executive Order No. 2. in April 1861, reconvening the Congress at gunpoint in Executive, emergency, martial-law-rule jurisdiction. Since that time there has been no “’de jure” (sanctioned by law) Congress. Everything functions under “color of law” (the appearance or semblance, without substance, of legal right.) Through Executive Orders under authority of the War Powers, (ie emergency, ie law of necessity) the “law of necessity” means no law whatsoever, as per such maxims of law as: “Necessity knows no law” [(the law of forbidding killing is voided when done in self-defense)]. “In time of war laws are silent.” Cicero. To establish the underlying debt of the Government to the Bankers, to create corporate entities that are legally subject to the jurisdiction which they exist, and to create the jurisdiction itself correctly, the so-called (fraudulent and unratified) Fourteenth Amendment was proclaimed and passed in 1868. This was a cestui que trust (operation in law) incorporated in a military, private, International, commercial, de facto jurisdiction created by, and belonging to, the Money Power, existing within the emergency of the War Powers, the only operational jurisdiction since the dissolution of Congress in 1861. Through the 14th Amendment, an artificial person-corporate entity-franchise entitled “citizen of the United States” was born into private, corporate limited liability. Section 4 of the 14th Amendment states: “The validity of the Public Debt of the United States (to the Bankers) … shall not be questioned.” Within the above-referenced private jurisdiction of the International Bankers , the private and foreign owned “Congress” formed a corporation, commercial agency, and Government for the “District of Columbia” on February 21, 1871, Chapter 62, 16 Stat. 419. This corporation was reorganized June 11, 1878, Chapter 180, 20 Stat. 102, and re-named “United States Government.” This corporation privately trade marked the names: “United States,” “US,” “US,” “USA,” “USA” and “America.” When the United States declared itself a municipal corporation, it also created what is known as a cestui que trust to function under by implementing the Federal Constitution of 1871, and incorporating the previous United States Constitutions of 1787 and 1791 as amended, as by-laws. Naturally, as the grantor of the trust, this empowered the United States Government to change the terms of the trust at will. As evidenced under the Federal Constitution of 1871, the 14th Amendment, the People of the United States, without their consent, were declared “Citizens” and granted “Civil Rights.” These so-called civil rights are nothing more than mere privileges. Privileges which government licenses, regulates, and can re-interpret to suit it’s purposes at any time for any reason. The Federal Corporate Government also conveniently somehow forgot to disclose to the People that the term “Citizen” with which they have made every living and breathing inhabitant a “subject”, was defined in law as a “Vessel” engaged in commerce. In 1912, when the bonds, that were keeping the US Government afloat, and, were owned by the Bankers, came due, the Bankers refused to re-finance the debt, and the colorable, martial-law-rule Congress was compelled to pass, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. This Act surrendered constitutional authority to create, control, and manage the entire money supply of the United States to a handful of private, mostly-foreign bankers. This placed exclusive creation and control of the money within the private, commercial, foreign, and military jurisdiction of 1861, into corporate limited liability. America converted from United States Notes to Federal Reserve Notes, beginning with the passage of The Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Federal Reserve Banks were incorporated in 1914, and, in 1916, began to circulate their private, corporate Federal Reserve Notes as “money” alongside the nations “de jure” currency, the United States Notes. Whereas United States Notes were actually warehouse receipts for deposits of gold and silver in a warehouse (bank), thus representing wealth (substance, portable land; the money of sovereigns), the new flat money (Federal Reserve Notes) amounted to “bills for that which was yet to be paid,” ie for what was owed! For the new “benefit” of being able to carry around US Government debt instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) in our wallets instead of Gold Certificates or Silver Certificates, we agreed to redeem the newly issued Federal Reserve Notes in gold and also to pay interest for their use in gold ONLY! Essentially, the Fed issued paper with pretty green ink on it and we agreed to give them gold in exchange for the “privilege” of using it. Such was the bargain. Through paying interest to the Federal Reserve Corporation in gold, the US Treasury became progressively depleted of its gold. America’s gold certificates, coin, and bullion were continually shipped off to the coffers of various European Banks and Power Elite. In 1933, when the Treasury was drained and the debt was larger than ever (a fina ncial condition known as “Insolvency”), President Roosevelt proclaimed the bankruptcy of the United States. Every 14th Amendment “citizen of the United States” was pledged as an asset to finance the Chapter 11 re-organization expenses and pay interest in perpetuity to the CREDITORS (Federal Reserve Bankers) and the “national debt”, (“which shall not be questioned”). On March 9, 1933, Congress passed the Amendatory Act (also known as the Emergency Banking Relief Act) to the Trading with the Enemy Act (originally passed on October 6, 1917) at a time when the United States was not in a shooting war with any foreign foe and included the People of the United States as the enemy. At the conference of Governors held on March 6, 1933, the Governors of the 48 States of the Union accommodated the Federal Bankruptcy of the United States Corporation by pledging the faith and credit of their State to the aid of the National Government. Senate Document 43 of the 73rd Congress, 1st Session (1933) did declare that ownership of ALL PROPERTY is in the STATE and individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of government, ie law amounting to “mere-user” only; and individual use of all property is subordinate to the necessities of the United States Government. Under House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, Senate Report No. 93549, and Executive Orders 6072, 6012 and 6246, the Congress and President Roosevelt officially declared bankruptcy of the United States Government. | Regardless of the cause or reason, what many American’s either do not understand and/or have failed to seriously grasp, is that by the use of Federal Reserve Notes; (which Is not Constitutional Money defined under Article I Section 10 of the United States Constitution), the People of the United States since 1933, have not had any Constitutionally lawful way to pay their debts. They therefore have not had any way to buy or own property. The People, for the benefits granted to them by a bankrupt corporate Government, discharge their debts with limited liability using Federal Reserve Notes. They have surrendered, by way of an unconscionable contract, their individual Rights under the Constitution, in exchange for mere privileges! A review of countless United States Supreme Court decisions since the 1938, landmark case, Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, (304 US 64-92) clearly establishes that only the State has Constitutional Rights, not the People. The People have been pledged to the bankruptcy of 1933. The federal law administered in and by the United States is the private commercial “law” of the CREDITORS. That, due to the bankruptcy, every “citizen of the United States” is pledged as an asset to support the bankruptcy, must work to pay the insurance premiums on the underwriting necessary to keep the bankrupt government in operation under Chapter II Bankruptcy (Reorganization). That upon the declared Bankruptcy, Americans could operate and function only through their corporate colored, State created, ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME, – that has no access to sovereignty, substance, rights, and standing in law. The Supreme Court also held the “general (Universal) common law” no longer is accessible and in operation in the federal courts based on the 1933, bankruptcy, which placed everything into the realm of private, colorable law merchant of the Federal Reserve CREDITORS. To take this to a different level and not only explain why you pay taxes, but also why you do not own the house you live in, the car you drive, or own anything else you think you’ve bought and paid for etc. The State Government and its CREDITORS own It all. If you think you own your home just because you believe you paid it using those Federal Reserve Notes, just like everything else you possess by permission of Government, simply stop paying your taxes, (user-fees), (licenses) and see just how long Government and the CREDITORS allow you to keep it before they come to take it away from you. How can all this really be? Why haven’t you been told all of this before now? Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Every man is deemed (required) to know the law. Government expects you to know the law, and holds you fully accountable for doing so. Ignoring these facts will not protect you. The majority of American’s have been given a Public Education to teach them only what the Public, ie government (CREDITORS) wants them to know. It is and always has been each individuals personal responsibility, duty and obligation to learn and know the law. What this breaks down to is this: Back in 1933, when the United States went into bankruptcy because it could no longer pay its debts it pledged the American People themselves without their consent as the asset to keep the government afloat and operating. Because government no longer had any way to pay its debts with substance, was bankrupt, it lost its sovereignty and standing in law. Outside and separate from Constitutional Government, to continue to function and operate, it created an artificial world consisting of artificial entities. This was accomplished by taking everyone’s proper birth given name and creating what is called a “fiction in law,” by way of an acronym, ie a name written in ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS to interact with. A name written in ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS is not a sentient, flesh and blood human being. It is a corporation, fiction or deceased person. Government as well as all corporations, including the Internal Revenue Service cannot deal interact with you or interact with you via your proper name given you at birth, only through your ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME! Another little tidbit of knowledge which has been conveniently kept from the People is this; When the Several united States signed the treaty with Great Britain ending the Revolutionary War, it was a concession that ALL COMMERCE would be regulated and contracted through British Attorney’s known as Esquires only. This condition and concession still exists today. No attorney or lawyer in the United States of America has ever been “licensed” to practice law (they’ve exempted themselves) as they are a legal fiction “person” and only an “ADMITTED MEMBER” to practice in the private franchise club called the BAR (which is itself an acronym for the British or Barrister Aristocratic or Accreditation Regency), as such are un-registered foreign agents, and so they are traitors. Esquires (Unconstitutional Title of honor and nobility = Esquires), foreign non-citizens (aliens) who are specifically prohibited from ever holding any elected Public Office of trust whatsoever! Article I, Section 9, clause 8, states: “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatsoever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.” As a direct result, attorneys and lawyers cannot and do not represent you in your proper birth or given name. Attorneys and lawyers re-present corporations, artificial persons, and fictions in law – ONLY! What the majority in this country fail to recognize is this: because of the bankruptcy and having been pledged as an asset to the National Government’s debt, this makes all citizens DEBTORS under Chapter 11. DEBTORS in bankruptcy having lost their solvency – have NO RIGHTS nor STANDING IN LAW and are at the mercy of the CREDITORS. All courts today sit and operate as Non-Constitutional, Non-Article Three Legislative Tribunals administering the bankruptcy via their “statutes,” (“codes.”) All Courts are Title 11 Bankruptcy Courts where these statutes are, in reality, “commercial obligations” being applied for the “benefit” or “privilege” of discharging debts with limited liability of the Federal Reserve-monopoly, colorable-money Federal Reserve Notes (debt Instruments). This means every time you end up before a court – not only do you NOT have any standing in law to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, YOU HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS! Why? Because you are a DEBTOR under the bankruptcy and in addition to having contracted away your rights in exchange for benefits and privileges; you do not have one single shred of evidence to establish otherwise. In bankruptcy ONLY CREDITORS have rights! In a nutshell, as a DEBTOR, it is impossible for you to access Constitutional Rights, they are reduced to mere priv ileges which are licensed, regulated, and can be altered, amended and changed to meet whatever the particular or special needs of government for whatever whim. If taking away your home, your car, taxing your labor, or locking you up for violating any of the Sixty MILLION plus legislatively created DEBTOR codes and statutes they have on the books today happens to meet the needs of government – it really doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize who the loser will be! ——– B. IS THERE REALLY A REAL REMEDY? Is there really a real remedy to what has been done? Quite simply, Yes! There is one way and one way only you can protect yourself, your family, and property from this public obligation. The only unbreakable contract in existence in the world today is a UCC-I Financing Statement. [See Appendix Attachment No. I, Copy of UCC-I Financing Statement.] Only through filing a UCC-I Financing Statement and Accepting For Value your Birth Certificate and executing a lien upon the governmentally created ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME by you in your proper Birth given Name as the Secured Party, and listing anything and everything you own, will own, or possibly ever could own, as collateral in the Security Agreement, can you effectively and permanently remove yourself from the status of a DEBTOR to that of a CREDITOR, and actually own property, have access to enforceable Constitutional Rights. By filing a UCC-I Financing Statement, you become an actual CREDITOR with standing in law and acquire the ability to stake a claim upon which relief can be granted, and not have the fruits of your labor taxed Simply following up the UCC-I Financing Statement with a Public Notice and Declaration/Depositum Declaration, can you, as a CREDITOR, acquire and access actual Original Jurisdiction Constitutional rights, that can be enforced. Without a UCC-I Financing Statement, everything you have is pledged and owned by the State. You merely are the user of the property and must use that property in strict compliance with all the rules and regulations established by the State. If acquiring actual Original Jurisdiction Constitutional Rights and having the ability to own property free from government controls, and the ability to earn a living without taxation – interests you, you have nothing to lose and everything to gain by executing that document without delay! Only through filing a UCC-I Financing Statement and Security Agreement and then executing a Public Notice and Declaration/Depositum Declaration is it possible for anyone to legally access Constitutional Rights. To try and break this down even further: Few people truly understand the words “slave and slavery.” The biggest benefit in filing a UCC-I Financing Statement is that you will no longer be a slave. The fact is, most dictionaries fail to provide an accurate definition of the words “slave and slavery.” Even Webster’s 1828 edition of the English language dictionary fails in its attempt to define the true meaning of the word “slavery”: “Slave: a person who is wholly subject to the will of another.” Slavery is not a matter of being totally 100% subject to the will of another. Any person who is to any degree Involuntarily subject to the will of another, is still a slave. There are no degrees of slavery. The second part of the 2nd definition of slave provided by Webster’s 1828 Edition is: “One who surrenders himself to any power whatsoever,” which is closer to the real point. The Uniform Commercial Code [UCC] governs ALL commercial transactions in the United States. Any “person” including government corporations, agencies, etc. involved in the “sales of goods, commercial paper, bank deposits and collections, letters of credit, bulk transfer, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, investment securities, and secured transactions” is governed by the UCC. The A form of Uniform Commercial Code is adopted by all States. To comply with the Uniform Commercial Code in your state, a UCC-I Financing Statement must be filed with the Secretary of State, by any “person” who makes a claim against any other “person” in the area of commerce. All government agencies, (city, county, state and federal), operate in commerce and all of them, including the Internal Revenue Service, are private corporations. All Courts operate in commerce. All Banks operate in commerce. All “Corporations operate in commerce and all of these “entities” exist financially because WE are their collateral. They borrow on our “credit.” At one time, our currency was backed by or given substance by gold or silver. It has been thought by many, since the United States took the substance of gold and silver away, that Federal Reserve Notes were simply worthless paper, backed by nothing at all. That is not correct! Today, real people, United States Citizen’s, you, me, your children, etc. back Federal Reserve Notes, much the same way that gold and silver did in the past. In other words, the living, breathing people guarantee or provide the substance for ALL money that is created. The Federal Reserve Bank clearly states: “Federal Reserve Notes are backed by the Full faith and credit of the American People.” Blind Faith sets forth that YOU trust THEM. Who? None other than the Federal Reserve! Credit means something is due you! The Federal Reserve uses our credit to create ALL money. All of the money created belongs to the American People and the deceit of the Public and private corporations is so complete, they create it, charge it to us as a debt and then tack interest to it on top of that How did the American People become collateral for the debt instruments known as Federal Reserve Notes? It was given to the Federal Reserve by a corporation called the United States, the very same corporation that created the Federal Reserve. As discussed previously, in 1933, when President Roosevelt declared a national emergency because the United States could no longer pay its debts. At least that was the spin given to the American People. All of the subsidiary States agreed to support the declared bankruptcy by “pledging” the energy of their “citizens.” Their assets consisted only of State Citizens. The States in turn used the Birth Certificates to pledge the State Citizen as collateral to keep Government afloat. That is how the American People became collateral for the Federal Reserve Notes and so-called debts. The American People became warehouse receipts, like a warehouse full of any type of valuable goods. All of this, however, was a major fraud. Neither the Internal Revenue Service nor any other entity like Government files a UCC-I Financing Statement Into the Commercial Registry with the Secretary of State. If they did, they would instantly become subject to all the regulations of the Uniform Commercial Code. The Internal Revenue Service has done very nicely by bluffing and intimidation, as all others mentioned, by operating under “Public Policy” where there is in reality “No Law” at all! The State Citizen is drawn “into commerce” when their Birth Certificate is registered and sent to the Commerce Department in Washington, DC This is where the American People became warehouse receipts upon which all of the money printed and circulated is created and guaranteed. In short, the American People became the collateral for all debts. They “The People” allegedly are “Government” property! Government is a “fiction” and an artificial person and deals with us as a fiction or artificial persons only as stated before. To take this still to another level, let’s use an example to explain and use the name of John Henry: Smith. When John Henry: Smith was born, his parents gave him the Christian name of John Henry and he shared the name of Smith with all the other members of his family. He was born a living, breathing being. When his Birth Certificate was sent to the Department of Commerce, it was registered and the Government, because it was bankrupt, turned his “real name” into a fiction. His new fictional name became JOHN H. SMITH or John H. Smith. His ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS NAME was registered as a corporation at the Puerto Rico Department of State Corporations (Departamento de Estado – Division de Corporaciones) PO BOX 3271, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO, 00904-3271, making him liable for taxes. He is now a fiction or artificial person; a non-living, non-breathing “person.” It is a “strawman” (Lat. stramineus homo) or “fiction” which government brings all its so-called charges against and NEVER against the real person. Just like “yours,” his driver’s license now reads JOHN H. SMITH or John H. Smith. When he signs a 1040 Tax Form, he dutifully fills out the form as John H. Smith and then signs his name “under penalty of perjury, ” thereby admitting he will be responsible for all the taxes of John H. Smith, a fiction in law, corporation. Look at your drivers license and see who it is issued to. How can government use a form of our name and turn it into a fiction (corporation) without our permission? They can’t, we sign our name to all of their forms, which is purely voluntary “permission-in-ignorance.” In short, we do it to ourselves! However, for those who wish to control and own this fiction and prohibit government corporations, including the Internal Revenue Service from making so- called charges against it, a remedy is available: to do this by executing a UCC- 1 Financing Statement! John Henry, Smith would simply do what Government and the Internal Revenue Service does not do: File your UCC-1 Financing Statement into the Commercial Registry with the Secretary of State and claim EVERYTHING related to JOHN H. SMITH or any derivative name, corporate fiction; ie: the Birth Certificate and Social Security Card and Number. The living, breathing, real person then owns and controls the fictitious entity, including all contracts related to the Birth Certificate and Social Security Number. Thusly, the real John H. Smith, secures all rights, interest and title in the fictitious entity. Now, government and the Internal Revenue Service has to deal with John Henry: Smith but they cannot!, because he is no longer subject to government control. Every living breathing person has both a Social Security Card and an Employer Identification Number (yes, there are exceptions). The Internal Revenue Service calls the Social Security Number our Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). Never do they mention our Employer Identification Number (EIN). What, “you are not an employer, so you do not have an EIN?” <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>But wait.</span> Pero espera.</span> Yes you do! We are all employers and every one of us has an EIN. If you apply for a new Social Security Card (not a new number), on the backside of the card written In Red is your Employer Identification Number. Government workers are all employees. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM! Government employees work for us!, we are their employer! That is why, when you read the Tax Code to find the definition of “employee,” under Title 26 United States Code, at Section 3401(c), the term “employee” specifically includes officers and employees, whether elected or appointed, of the United States, a State (Federal State), Territory, or any other political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. EVERY ONE OF THEM ARE EMPLOYEES – THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE THE EMPLOYER. Write to the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the Capital of the State where you were born and request a copy of your Birth Certificate. REQUEST THE LONG FORM (Certified Copy). Never mind that you have a copy right now. More likely than not it came from the County in which you were born. The number assigned to your Birth Certificate by the Vital Statistics Office is of primary importance when executing your UCC-I Financing Statement. ======= C. RELIEF FROM TAXES AND ALL OTHER COMMERCIAL OBLIGATIONS ARE AS SIMPLE AS A UCC-I FILING AND COMMERCIAL PROCESS AWAY! What can filing a UCC-I Financing Statement do for you besides everything described thus far? Let’s throw a few more examples onto the table to explain. As previously stated, the only real thing in the United States, is the American People. Corporations are fictions – DEAD ENTITIES! Let’s use a fiction called GENERAL MOTORS for our explanation. Since the inception of GENERAL MOTORS which was originally created by another corporate fiction we call government, they have borrowed into existence countless billions of Federal Reserve Notes. Today GENERAL MOTORS proudly calls themselves one of the largest corporations (a fiction) in the world! It is taught that stockholders of GENERAL MOTORS “own” GENERAL MOTORS. The real truth is the American People own everything produced by GENERAL MOTORS – free and clear. Isn’t it interesting this fiction charges us the American People for what already belongs to us – and then to add more insult to injury – they tack on a little interest to boot! When Internal Revenue sends a letter or Notice to the fiction JOHN H. SMITH and says “Our records indicate you owe $15,000.00,” John Henry: Smith, who has filed a UCC-I Financing Statement now has multiple options as to how he chooses to deal with this matter. John Henry: Smith knows full well he must respond to the presentment he’s just received from Internal Revenue in a timely manner. Depending on the Notice or Presentment he’s received he has either ten (10) days or thirty (30) days to respond. If he does not know what his time frame is to respond in is, to play it safe, it would be best for him to respond before the ten (10) days expires. John Henry: Smith knows that if he doesn’t respond, after the allotted time. If he fails to respond. Internal Revenue will enter a Default Judgment against him. Because he failed to object to the bill or ask any questions about it, having defaulted, the amount can lawfully be collected from him. John Henry: Smith also knows that you never argue the amount of deficiency in any tax case. If you are not required to file, you should not care whether they say you owe fifteen thousand dollars or one hundred and fifty thousand dollars. If you are not required to file, the amount doesn’t matter. You never argue the amount because that is a fact issue. The reason for this is, usually when you receive a Notice of Deficiency, it is for some unworldly amount. The Internal Revenue Service wants you to run in and argue about the amount. The minute you say “I don’t owe that much,” you have just agreed that you owed something and conceded jurisdiction. One of the proper methods is to immediately write the Internal Revenue Service a letter notifying them their Presentment is dishonored by you and you have reserved all rights under the Uniform Commercial Code at UCC 1-207. This normally should be all that is required. If this doesn’t make the matter disappear then John Henry: Smith can exercise option No. 2 and can “Accept the $15,000.00 for Value” and the so-called debt is extinguished. Wh y? How Is that possible? Because every “real” American has a corresponding offsetting “credit” for all debt claimed against his Strawman or fiction. Real folks all across America are filing UCC-I Financing Statements and ridding themselves of the debt and fraud of this beast system called by many as government and their created fictions. It has been established, “Lawyers and Attorneys have written well over Sixty Million Codes and Statutes to confound and confuse the American People and enslave them.” None of these Codes or Statutes apply to any living, breathing, people who claim their heritage through what God has preserved. The fact that many Americans are filing UCC-I Financing Statements and commercially liberating themselves has caused major alarms to go off with Government and the CREDITORS. In an attempt to slow down this mass exodus, the Secretary of State’s Offices after July 1, 2001, will accept no more signature filings. This means, if you, as a flesh and blood human being, have not filed your UCC-I Financing Statement before July 1 2001, your ability to remove yourself from that status of a DEBTOR with mere privileges to the status of a CREDITOR with enforceable Rights, is subject to become considerably more difficult to achieve. Therefore, he who hesitates, is lost – just as the old saying goes: “Snooze, you lose!” After filing your UCC-I Financing Statement, it can be used by the real person to obtain what is known as a “Security Interest” in the fiction (aka Strawman) whom the Internal Revenue Service uses to force, intimidate, threaten and compel the real flesh and blood person to pay what are called taxes. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a Financing Statement is used under Article IX to reflect a Public Record that there is a Security Interest or claim to the goods in question to secure a debt. The Financing Statement is filed by the Security Holder (real person) with the Secretary of State, or similar public body, and as a result becomes Public Record. As a party with ownership of the fiction or (Strawman), you become the Secured Party with ALL RIGHTS, INTEREST, AND TITLE in the fiction’s Birth Certificate, Social Security Number, Driver’s License, Automobile, Certificates of Title, Credit Cards, Loans, Property, Taxes, etc., etc.! So what did it cost the moneychangers to enslave the American People? <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Nothing!</span> ¡Nada!</span> The same is true for freedom; “For thus saith the Lord, Ye have sold yourselves for naught (nothing), and ye shall be redeemed without money.” Isaiah 52nd Chapter, 4th verse 1. 1) BAIT and SWITCH vs. CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE Every contract consists of both an offer and acceptance. In every contract there is an Offeror and acceptor. The offer being the tale and the acceptor the head. Under contract law, title to whatever is offered transfers instantaneously upon acceptance, not upon payment like many seem to think. Payment, a consideration, is merely incidental. Attorney’s and Lawyers who write every contract used by corporations, including Government Corporations, know that the acceptor of the contract is in charge or what is known as the Holder in Due Course. Holder in Due Course is defined as: “Title Holder of the contract.” Thus, whenever you see any advertisement in the paper by a New Car Dealer offering you a new car at a certain price, and you’re attracted by what is offered, you run right down to the car dealer and without knowing it become the victim of the oldest game of bait and switch in existence! Here is how the real shakedown works: After you settle on the car with all it’s options and the price with the dealership, you then sign your name to a contract, which in doing so, makes you the Offeror and the dealership the acceptor of that offer. It works the same identical way in every retail sale in the country, including Real Estate. You lose, because the seller is the Holder of the contract and in charge. That is the reason why you only get a carbon or photocopy of the contract. They keep the original contract and original signatures and obediently enter the property into commerce as the lawyers intended. It is a diabolical scheme! Whenever a Government Corporation sends you a letter, indictment or anything else charging that you violated some statute or code or that you owe some sort of tax or fine, think of that as an offer by the Government. For example: let’s say you receive a bill for property taxes. This is an offer by the tax office just like the new car dealer. There are several options that you have when you get the bill. The number one option which most people take is to write out a check for the amount due. A check of course, is a debt instrument. Thus you are making a counter-offer to the tax collector, which they of course will accept, but the debt HAS NOT been extinguished. It is simply added to the PUBLIC DEBT. Once again, you have become the victim of a bait and switch! Lets use the same example as we’ve previously discussed and this time, lets use a different tactic. Remember that the acceptor is in charge. This time lets simply Accept the “tax bill” for Value with the “right of chargeback.” When you examine your property tax bill, you find out it is made out to a name (purportedly yours) in all capital letters. Which as you’ve already discovered is not you! It is a fiction created by the government. If you’ve done your homework, you’ve obtained a certified copy of your Birth Certificate from the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State where you were born and have filed your UCC-I Financing Statement. Now you own all rights, title and interest in that all capital letter name character, including ALL contracts, mortgages and pledges. You’re now in charge of anything you want to do with the fiction. It works the same way with Internal Revenue Service. They send the fiction a “tax bill” for $20,000.00. You as the owner of the fiction, Accept their presentment for Value, place a value of $20,000,000.00, for example on it and notify whoever sent you the presentment that you now want a copy of their fiduciary tax return. You can request this because all of the money created uses your credit/labor as collateral. The amount you use is up to you. Only you can personally determine what value to place upon this trespass and violation of your property. 2) ADVANTAGES OF UTILIZING THE “AFFIDAVIT DENYING EXISTENCE OF CORPORATION!” The words “Specific Negative Averment” which is what an “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” really amounts to, are taken verbatim out of Rule 9(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which in the Rule provides and describes exactly how to challenge corporate existence solvency, and capacity to sue and be sued. The term “Averment” comes from the root word “aver”: to declare or assert; to set out distinctly and formally; to allege. An averment is a positive declaration or affirmation of fact, especially an allegation. It is submitted in the form of an affidavit so as to invoke the superior credibility and power that comes with having unlimited commercial liability. As an honest, forthright, conscientious, sentient being you have nothing to hide or fear and so can state your position openly and fully by affidavit. Others with hidden agendas and skeletons in the closet need to hide behind their corporate mothers’ skirts of only limited liability. They are too terrified of being held personally accountable for anything to step up to the commercial plate and swear out an affidavit stating anything. Executing the “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” requires the receiving/served party to respond by affidavit, both written in longhand in red ink and notarized in red ink and sent to you via the Notary Public, and further requires that they prove: a) All of the various fictitious, non-existent, undefined assemblages of all-capital-letters, eg “INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,” etc. legally exist, ie are solvent, have standing in law, and can be present in a court; and b) Each has a proven contractual nexus with all the others, including the artificial person represented by the corrupted, all-capital-letter version of your true name. Failure to accomplish the above in the manner prescribed in the affidavit establishes on the record his/her/their confession and consent of judgment that none of those entities exist. That there is no enforceable contract. You are not required to become involved in an imaginary dispute between non-existent entities! It is crucial to realize, that the only way we can survive as a civilization is to cause truth to prevail. If history be our teacher, since it is so often stated: “History repeats itself and those who fail to learn from History, are doomed to repeat it,” is forever present. Any society functioning on lies, ie data contrary to the way things actually are and function, will fail. As It is, mankind on this planet is hell bent for dissolution and disappearance as a living species. This is no exaggeration. When thoughts, words, and deeds of billions of people are increasingly wrong, erroneous, and false, the natural cause/effect consequences of such futile efforts to violate the laws of existence self-function to assert their own integrity. All that is false and contrary to the truth of man’s basic nature and the nature of life eventually self-destructs as a consequence. Establishing truth in situations requires exposing the actual nature of everything that is proffered. The entire system thrives and ravages the world because people accept the surface appearance of things at face value without looking for the underlying cause and exposing the truth of the matter so it can be recognized and understood. Reality’s game is “truth or consequences.” The consequence of acting contrary to truth begets ruin It is therefore essential to neutralize both of the ways people are damaged by the systematic war being waged against them by their so-called “Public Servants”: the commercial process and the “legitimacy” in the Law of Nations of War as a valid activity of nation States. In certain circumstances, in compliment and simultaneously with the Affidavit Denying. existence of Corporation, the “Accepted For Value” UCC Commercial Process and whatever other affidavits might be deployed, the “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” is essential to neutralize the commercial aspect of the war, and the Affidavit, “Bill of Peace” is used to expose the naked aggression of the systematic war being waged under color of law. Anyone who wants to deal with you who will “NOT COME CLEAN” and be honest, sincere, and well intentioned, is self-confessing to be: a) Disregarding the truth and acting on lies, deceit, bad faith, and absence of full disclosure, and thereby announcing to you by their actions (and failures to act) that they are an aggressor, criminal con artist with no authority, and an enemy. Since no contract can be formed without genuine agreement – free consent and mutual meeting of the minds based on full disclosure, good faith, and truth no contract can result from your interaction with them other than the criminal contract formed unilaterally by them via their assault upon you. This further voids all and every basis upon which to require you to do anything they say or to have anything to do with them. b) Acting on their own, with no legitimate authority whatsoever, and are therefore personally_liable_in unlimited-commercial-liability capacity, ie NAKED! Upon your opponents failure to answer or rebut your Affidavit of Specific Negative Averment and Execute your Bill of Peace a Notice of Default and Stipulation is thereby executed, served upon them and recorded in the Public Record. 3) ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE? Once the “real, live, flesh and blood- Individual has filed a UCC-I Financing Statement with Security Agreement in place and taking “all rights, title and interest” in the ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS FICTION, ASSEMBLAGE, ARTIFICIAL PERSON (that very so-called name may be spelled with a first name, middle initial and last name) or “Strawman/Woman” when a “person (agency or other public or private corporation)” submits a letter or form suggesting that you (when its really the fiction) are being charged with a debt, taxes or whatever, a personalized letter is sent to the person who signed the letter or form or a person responsible for the letter or form being sent to the fiction. That letter explains that you (the real deal) “Accept the Charge for Value.” This basically tells them you hold title to the FICTION and anything .connected to the FICTION, it gives them NOTICE that they have committed a “Trespass against your property … Your Rights!” It sets in stone that you are “the Holder-in-Due-Co urse.” This is a banking/securities term and requires a quick refresher definition: “In every contract there must be an offer, acceptance and a consideration. Corporations specialize in bait-and-switch tactics to protect themselves in every contractual arrangement. Such as, when you see a home you like, the real estate agency may have “offered” the home for sale through various advertisements. This is an offer. You look at the home and like it and the price is right. You tell the real estate agent “Yes, I’ll take it ! “At that point you have become the acceptor of the contract and of course the home and price is the consideration. From a legal standpoint, this contract Is completed. The offer, acceptance and consideration are completed right then. The acceptor is the ‘one “in charge.” That at the moment, could be you. Then comes the old switch-a-roo! Now is when the bait-and-switch goes down. The real estate agent (unwittingly, as though ignorance of the law is any excuse or defense) then requires you to fill out a FORM in which you make an Offer and They the Seller become the Acceptor! The bait and switch is complete. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>That simple.</span> Eso es simple.</span> You have now “voluntarily” become a DEBTOR -“forever,” even if you paid cash for the place or latter pay of the mortgage. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why?</span> ¿Por qué?</span> Why can’t you pay it off? YOU CANNOT EXTINGUISH DEBTS WITH A DEBT INSTRUMENT (Ie FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES)! -<[Debt + Debt ? Debt; Credit + Credit ? Credit, neither satisfy or cancel the obligation of payment and do not constitute payment!]&Mac221;-.” You have voluntarily made someone else the Holder in Due Course of the property. They accepted the instrument (contract) FOR VALUE. They now own the property. “All parts of the contract, including the deed are now “recorded in the property records. Look at your deed. It will have the, “FICTIONS” written in all capital letters. All we really do is add to the so-called National Debt whenever you-pay those taxes and make that counteroffer, with the debt, however, not changing and remaining the same whenever you purchase anything in this manner. So when you receive a Notice of Property-taxes on your home, the taxing authority is really making you an “offer.” When you pay the taxes you are inking a counter-offer, because your payment will not extinguish the debt or cancel it out. They will accept your counter-offer, however, but the debt will still be there. By the way, the Notice of Property Tax due will be made out to your FICTION! Keep these things in mind when you purchase ‘a hone, land, auto, “etc. You make the contract.! Make the seller the Offeror and yourself (the real person with your; name spelled correctly) the acceptor of the offer. This puts you officially in charge! Make gold and/or silver a part of the consideration to extinguish the debt. You will be the Holder in Due Course. YOU keep the original contract and give the Offeror a copy. Do not record-the contract unless you want to give up the allodial title to the property. Recordings is not required and the original, contract by itself is all you need to prove and establish ownership. Now with this explanation covered, lets move to the person who wrote the letter charging that you owed something. After filing the UCC-1 Financing Statement and acquiring a Certified copy of it with Security Agreement, you are now the Holder in Due Course of the property known as the FICTION or (Strawman) and any contract associated with him or her! Think of the letter as an OFFER and rather than making a counter-offer by paying, you now Accept the offer for Value. By Accepting’ for Value, you are saying, “I am the Holder in Due Course” and … because you have become the ACCEPTOR of the offer, guess Who is in charge? You are in charge and the Offeror has trespassed upon you and your PROPERTY! As the Secured Party or owner of the PROPERTY and Holder in Due Course, you now can set a value on the trespass. So if the Offeror has made the charge that your PROPERTY owes $25,000.00, you can Accept the offer For Value and set a value on it literally for any amount you choose! For discussion purposes, let’s put a value on it for $250,000.00. You are going to tell this person to charge the $250,000.00, to your Personal Treasury Account and provide your Employer Identification number for the Account Number to be charged. This will be directed to the Secretary of the Treasury in Washington, DC The person has three days in under the Truth-in-Lending-Act to do what has been ordered. In addition, you are going to request that this person send you his/her Fiduciary Tax Return, which would show they have filed and paid taxes on the $250,000.00. They won’t respond, so ten (10) days later you send a Second Request and at the same time send a letter and a Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange ordering the Secretary to “Charge Back” the $250,000.00, in which the Secretary will be directed to credit the “other side” of his ledger for use by the Republic. When enough folks do this Re-Public – credits will eventually be in excess of the Public Sides Debits! All of this is done in accordance with Uniform Commercial Code, UCC-3-419 and the Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange In accord with House Joint Resolution (HJR-192) and will discharge the Public Debt. The Secretary of the Treasury also only has three (3) days to complete his side of this Order. For he also is required to operate within the Banking Regulation Z, 72 Hour period regulation guideline governing retail agreements, as codified at: 15 USC §§ 1601 et seq. Basically you are done. By Accepting everything the (government or any corporation) brings your way for Value – there is no argument – no fight. Remember everything is a “charge” from every Government corporation or so called private corporation. A “Charge” is basically to IMPOSE a burden, duty, obligation, or lien. In criminal law, to “charge” is to indict or formally accuse. Everything centers around a DEBTOR being charged and the CREDITOR making the accusation. To IMPOSE means to levy ‘or exact, to lay as a burden, tax, duty or charge. Remember that ALL CHARGES are brought forth against a FICTION and if you (the real deal) owns all rights, title and interest in the FICTION, ALL CHARGES CAN BE DISCHARGED by you, the real person, on the other side of being “charged,” which is all a court of equity can do (all courts are courts of equity – bankruptcy), is to make a “claim.” A claim means a demand as one’s own or as one’s right. A FICTION, ie, a public or private corporation, cannot make a claim against a real person. Only a real person can make a claim against a real person Corporations are FICTIONS and have no right to make claims. ———- D. NOW YOU CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE BENEFITS OF UCC-1 FINANCING STATEMENT AND HAVING THE SECURITY AND PROTECTION OF AN UNBEATABLE SECURITY AGREEMENT IN PLACE TO PROTECT YOU, YOUR FAMILY, POSSESSIONS, PROPERTY AND WAGES. SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY offers one of the most comprehensive Security Agreements available today. This Security Agreement* is NON-DISCHARGEABLE by ANY Title II Bankruptcy Court, and is fully 100% transferable to any Heir or Assign. This Security Agreement carries a fully functionable Fidelity Bond and Indemnity Clause. The collateral covered is as extensive of coverage available! SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY offers UCC-I Forms, Special Notices, Acceptance for Value Commercial Process Assistance, personalized service with processing, copying, typing, filing, Certified Document Custodian Service and Assistance, Process of Service Services in ALL STATES regardless where, you live SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY provides prompt professional support services for all your COMMERCIAL affairs and needs. SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY’S PROFESSIONAL PROCESS CONSULTANTS provide valuable and accurate information for educational enlightenment, and enrichment to empower you with “the knowledge” and assurance that in every commercial matter, the proceedings transpire only under the following terms and conditions: 1. ALL participants must be limited-liability corporations (persons, artificial persons) 2. Proceedings occur only with the express consent of all involved persons; 3. Each corporation must prove solvency in order to go to court; 4. Each corporation, as a limited liability person, must be insured and bonded (underwritten) to provide the stakes at risk in the dispute that are subject to claim in the event of losing the matter; 5. Your “Affidavit Denying Existence of Corporation” and, “Bill of Peace” are processed and serviced upon the parties with Notice that: “NO” summary or equity proceeding can conclude with any genuine issues of material fact in dispute: 6. No civil proceeding can commence until all criminal elements are exposed and resolved; and, 7. No facts exist to be set Into evidence or rendered subject to dispute until all the underlying principles of issue in dispute have been clarified SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY provides full Secretarial, Research, and other professional support services at a reasonable rate. To maintain and prevail against any summary or equity proceeding (which is all there is today in all of the system’s colorable, general-equity, privately owned, limited-liability, military, bankruptcy courts). Other Specialized Services include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Besides a variety of documents, photocopying, mailing, filing, recording, executing/processing/stamping all paperwork “ACCEPTED FOR VALUE,” Notary Services for certification of your Unlimited Commercial Liability true, correct, and complete, all filing certified filed in the Commercial Claim Registry; 2. Complete Assistance with credentials properly prepared In your true name (In upper-and-lower-case letters) to give everyone Notice of your “Unlimited Commercial Liability.” 3. Whenever you experience any encounter with the system, assistance with immediate Notices to all parties of your unlimited Commercial Liability using seven (7) point affidavits, “for and on the record,” in which they are unequivocally noticed and told: a) You are a real, sentient, flesh-and-blood man or woman acting with unlimited Commercial Liability; b) That you are unlimited in undertaking all lawful and commercially just means to prot ect your life, rights, and property; c) You have no requirement to be bonded; d) You cannot be made subject to any limited liability proceeding without your consent, and you do not consent; e) You must exhaust your commercial remedies prior to accessing any tax-financed court system to resolve any possible dispute; f) Everything is under oath via affidavit certified and sworn on your unlimited commercial liability true, correct, complete, and everyone who is a party of the proceeding must be similarly sworn in or withdraw; g) Failure to Withdraw or be sworn in self-impeaches and self-invalidates all of that person’s testimony and credibility establishing fatal defects which terminates the case, and constitutes a mistrial and reversible error, so that anything done thereafter by such person constitutes legal and commercial violations which are actionable; h) The insurance policy and bond of every judge and attorney involved limit them to dealing only with limited-liability corporate persons and forecloses them from being able to deal in any manner with unlimited-liability being such as you; i) Since everyone in an equity or summary process must expressly consent to the proceedings and you expressly do not consent, they are barred from involving you in any such proceeding; j) If they insist, they are required to prove identify, authority, liability limits, and solvency by furnishing you a copy of their bond and insurance policy; k) They are foreclosed from undertaking any such proceeding with genuine issues of material fact unresolved, and the issue of your unlimited-commercial-liability standing is a fundamental issue inasmuch as it is legally impossible-for you to be in their court, or for any matters involving you to even commence, so long as they are in limited liability and you are under unlimited commercial liability; and, l) Since no civil matters can commence until all possible criminal elements are resolved, conduct and inquiry of everyone who might want to induce or compel you to participate if anything you say can be used against you in any possible criminal proceeding, and if so to provide Notice that you exercise your right Secured by the Fifth Article In Amendment to remain silent. 1. Upon filing your UCC-I Financing Statement and Security Agreement and opening your Personal Treasury Account, SOSS/COMMERCIAL CLAIMS PROCESSING AGENCY offers Tax Relief Assistance Programs by assisting you with the following documents: a) Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Request to establish/prove your (Strawman)/LEGAL FICTION has in fact been registered in Puerto Rico as a corporation; b) Public Notice and Declaration The Law Does Not Permit Impossibilities, to access Original Jurisdiction Constitutional Rights; c) Certified Demand for Proof of Jurisdiction; d) Affidavit in Support of Proof of Jurisdiction; e) Memorandum with Points and Authorities; f) Demand for “Employee” definition; g) Certificate/Affidavit of Non Revenue Taxable Occupation; h) Withholding Exemption Certificate; i) Demand for Full Payment of Wages and Cease Desist Withholding j) Demand for Refund for past three (2) years taxes erroneously paid; k) Accepted for Value and Exempt from Levy and Request of Employee Identification Number and Copy of 1099 OID; l) State Income Tax Affidavit for Relief from State Income Taxes in those States where applicable. Regrettably, performance is mandatory and failure to act immediately to remedy this matter is an unacceptable option or excuse. If actually owning that home you live in, the car you drive, and anything and everything else you possess, if having access to Original Jurisdiction Constitutional Rights and its protections and if having the full fruits of your labor interests you . <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>.</span> .</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>.</span> .</span> The time to act is now! Tomorrow may very well be too late!

EL ARGUMENTO UCC

LA DESCRIPCIÓN GENERAL UCC

DEBE SER CIUDADANO

What Is A Citizen? Most people seem to rely on dictionaries for the definitions of words – however it is a fact that the information set forth in dictionaries does not in any way constitute the definitions thereof but merely sets forth the common understanding of words as the words are commonly used – this is what we understand to be correct “diction”. Put another way, the explanations of words set forth in dictionaries are erroneously referred to as “definitions” , when actually, all a dictionary does is set forth the ever changing commonly understood meaning of words – a dictionary does NOT set forth definitions of words – word definitions can only be found in statutes or other legal writings where the meaning of certain words are specifically set forth and “defined” as such words are used in such statutes or other legal writings wherein such definitions are set forth. I would never allow any dictionary and certainly not a so-called legal dictionary, to be used to establish the definition or understanding of a word!! Instead I go to how the word in question was used and understood and applied in the real life “diction” of the common people of the day. In the case of the word “citizen”- from observation as to how “citizens” are treated in the United States – it is clear therefrom that the word “citizen” as that word is applied to “citizens of the United States”, that in the United States the word “citizen” refers to a person whose lives, in every aspect thereof, are totally under the dominion and control of the fictional political government of the United States. From observation it is clear that the government of the United States (and its sub entities knows as states, counties and cities) wield total and unlimited control over every aspect of the lives of those persons who are designated as citizens of the United States. A citizen of the United States has virtually ZERO authority in regard to his or her own life – citizens of the United States are presently accorded the privilege of determining what brand of toilet paper they may use and how many squares they may use to wipe themselves but it is clear that this privilege may be withdrawn at any time and that the vast majority of citizens of the United States would meekly accede to a government requirement that they save and turn in their used toilet paper in exchange for fresh unused paper when the government decides to require such – or – such citizens would readily comply with a governmental order that they are to use both sides of their toilet paper before they will be issued fresh toilet paper. So the foregoing is what a citizen is, as that word is applied in the United States – that is, a citizen of the United States is a person whose life is totally under the political jurisdiction and control of the government of the United States – with absolutely ZERO exception. What Are The Duties And Responsibilities Of US Citizenship? From observation of the docile submissive conduct of citizens of the United States it is clear that citizens of the United States are totally convinced and accept and believe they owe total unmitigated allegiance, service and loyalty to the fictional political government of the United States. Although there is what is called a Constitution, which is purported to restrain the government and protest the rights of those persons who live in the United States – in practice citizens of the United States acknowledge that this document’s actual purpose is to allow citizens of the United States to teach their children that they are free, when in truth, there is no freedom anywhere within the United States – What this practice does is allow the citizens of the United States to claim that they are free – the ability to claim that they are free has proven itself to be far more precious to those who live in the United States than their ability to actually be free – after all – a people who are actually free would have to take individual responsibility for providing their own necessities of life rather than turning to the government to provide every such necessity. Citizens of the United States freely acknowledge that their government has the power and authority to conscript their productivity through any form of armed robbery it can devise (euphemistically called “taxation”), and to use this conscripted wealth to institute and wage wars on foreign governments and kill millions of innocent people in foreign countries for the purpose of the US government gaining control over crude oil located in these foreign countries. And the citizens of the Unites States allow and encourage their children to enlist in the military of the United States in order for the US government to be able to have the ability to murder millions of innocent foreign people for the purpose of stealing their crude oil – while the US government publicly claims that the purpose of the foreign warfare is to fight international terrorism – which the US government itself is most guilty of and itself instituted on 9/11/01, in a phony “attack” on New York and the Pentagon. Citizens of the United States eagerly allow and encourage every level of government of the United States to create ever more laws regulating and micro-managing their day to day activities – including (but not limited to) the insertion of ID chips under their skin – after all – if a citizen has nothing to hide – then why would a citizen have any objection to such reasonable ID requirements? Such citizens allowed the fictional federal government to empower a privately owned central bank to issue a worthless paper money where the private banksters then charge an interest, impossible for borrowers to repay, and then the private banksters take their profits through foreclosures on borrowers homes and other pledged assets – and the citizens of the United States accept this fiat money system without complaint. Plainly put, slightly rephrasing the words of the forth article of the Fourteenth Amendment – “Citizens of the United States – shut up and pay up!!” So, What Are The Benefits And Privileges Of US Citizenship? You tell me!! For a person born in the geographical area of North America – claimed by the fictional political government of the United States to be under the political jurisdiction of the fictional United States – I cannot discern any benefit whatsoever in a person so born in making such a claim!! Moreover, it is highly doubtful whether a person born in North Korea or Communist China would be politically any better off in the United States – as a naturalized citizen of the United States. Of course this negative does not seem to apply to Mexican Nationals who are encouraged to sneak into the United States and then are further encouraged and allowed to receive all manner of government social benefits without paying for such benefits – paid for by the financial extractions from the income of “citizens” born in the United States – extracted from such United States citizens at gun point!! If such persons born in North America were properly advised (full and honest disclosure), as to the undeniable fact that when they were born they were born totally free and individually sovereign and independent over their own individual person – with absolutely no fealty or other political obligation to any fictional political entity created by persons born prior to themselves – which of such persons so born would ever voluntarily opt into US servitude citizenship? Why is it that parents of children born in North America teach their children that such children are born in the United States when it is a totally absurd assertion to claim that a real live human baby could ever actually be born into a fictional political entity that does not exist in nature?? If a pregnant woman were to give birth to her baby in a Boy Scout camp – would her baby then be a Boy Scout – what if her baby were a girl?? Why is it that fictional commercial entities, such as Wal-Mart, General Motors and about a million other similar commercial fictional entities operate quite successfully on a voluntary basis without employing gunpoint coercion?? Why is it that a fictional political entity, purporting to have been created for the purpose of protecting liberty and freedom, chooses to resort to armed robbery in order to fund its ability to protect liberty and freedom – and why does such a fictional political entity claim that in order for the government to be able to protect your liberty and freedom – that you must agree to give up your liberty and freedom? How Does A Person Become A US Citizen? Although it is widely accepted and believed that citizenship is acquired automatically by birth within the political jurisdiction of a fictional political entity, such is nonetheless not the case!! However a person might become a citizen, acquiring citizenship by birth is a total impossibility and a total fraud!! Perpetrated by the tyrants operating fictional political entities of their own creation and for their own selfish self-serving purposes. It is of the utmost significance to fully understand the basic fundamental fact that governments do not exist in nature – that governments are the intellectual products of the human mind!! How can it be at all reasonable that certain humans who happened to be born prior to your birth – have any proper natural authority to decide and declare that you owe political fealty to them and must pay tribute to them?? The entire concept is totally silly!! How would you react if Wal-Mart were to declare that you must purchase everything that you need from Wal-Mart and that you must pay Wal-Mart whatever Wal-Mart decides to charge. There is only one way that a person can properly become a citizen of the united States and the operative word in that statement is “properly” – this would require a full and honest disclosure to the person including everything set forth in the prior sections of this essay – with such a disclosure it is impossible to imagine any sane mature person ever volunteering into US citizenship. Persons born in North America are told that they must attend school in order to be educated in order to be able to take care of themselves in their adulthood. This is an outright lie. The clear purpose of telling children and parents this nonsense is so that the government schools can indoctrinate all children to believe that they are citizens of the United States as a result of being born in the United States – which – as explained above – it is totally impossible for a real live flesh and blood human baby to be born into a fictional entity that does not exist in nature (yes, I know that is redundant). If taxation (armed robbery) were eliminated as the means of funding government then there would be no pressing need for the government to con people into being citizens!! If the government were funded by a voluntary means then the government would not have to resort to blatant dishonesty and coercion in order to gather its funding. Such a voluntary means of funding government is already in place and gathering billions and billions of dollars every year – however these billions are not going to the government – these billions are instead, presently going into the private pockets of the private owners of the Federal Reserve – it is important to understand that the Federal Reserve does not loan any of its own money or any of the money of its private owners and the Fed has absolutely no investment or risk in any of these loans so there is no justification whatsoever for the private owners of the Federal Reserve to be reaping these huge profits – this must be changed and it must be changed now!! If the issuance of money was transferred to The People’s Central Bank and the issuance of money was limited to lending of money to private sector borrowers where the interest collected thereon was credited to the treasuries of the various levels of government throughout the Fifty Several States, then taxation could be totally eliminated throughout the entire Federation and, once this system was established in this country, the concept would then sweep over the entire world, introducing a period of world wide prosperity never before experienced or even imagined by mankind!! Cheers, I’m Eric, WhoRU?? ———————————————————————————————— Are you a US citizen? As received… To: MYRLANDsMETHODs@yahoogroups. com From: farm_stone@yahoo.com Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:07:20 +0000 Subject: [MYRLANDsMETHODs] Letter from friend on differant jurisdictions Jerry, Thanks for sending the article. I have been trying to explain the different jurisdictions to people, but boy it sure did raise cognitive dissonance in Don Cline a couple of weeks back. The court cases that I include below fortify the fact that US citizens are “resident aliens” within their states of the Union that compose the Republic. I am also convinced that a foreign US citizen of DC accepts citizenship in the corporate structure that operates within his state of the Union such as the 1857 “State of Iowa” that operates within the borders of the 1846 state called Iowa. To lawfully achieve total freedom under common law, US citizens have to wake up to the fact that they are citizens of “a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations” such as red China and they are definitely not Citizens in the Republic consisting of the United States meaning “the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution” . Under English common law you are a citizen of the country in which you were born for life (in my case Iowa) and you can never ever expatriate from your country in which you were born and you have no choice in the matter. Under the government’s Roman Civil law you can freely expatriate from your country of Michigan and voluntarily choose to become a citizen of any foreign jurisdiction if that jurisdiction will accept you as its citizen. The common law exists in the states while the Supreme Court has stated in Erie Railroad v. Thompkins that there is no federal general common law. The Supreme Court has also opined as follows: The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends, or it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution. HOOVEN & ALLISON CO. v. EVATT, 324 US 652 (1945): and “The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two governments: one State, and the other National; . . . . . The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government. He owes allegiance to the two departments, so to speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties which each exacts for disobedience to its laws. ” US v. CRUIKSHANK, 92 US 542 This means the US citizen has “voluntarily submitted himself” into being a foreign US citizen and “subject” to two governments under Roman civil law. The Declaration of Independence says “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” US citizens born in the states voluntarily provide consent for their just powers and don’t even realize their subject status by their citizenship in DC There are two of nearly everything and this really confuses people. The Iowa Supreme Court has stated that there are no common law crimes within “The State of Iowa”. The courts of the corporate “State of Iowa” will give the common law no standing, all while the Iowa Supreme Court has also opined respecting Iowa, to wit: We have previously acknowledged that although not expressly declared by our statutes or constitution to be part of Iowa law, “the common law has always been . . . in force in Iowa.” Iowa Civil Liberties Union v. Critelli, 244 NW2d 564 (Iowa 1976) In the Supreme Court of Iowa No. 125 / 05-0485 (Certified Question of Law) This opinion was a certified question of law presented to the Iowa Supreme Court by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. All of this is why I have formally declared allegiance to my country of Iowa (not the corporate State of Iowa) and I have renounced my US citizenship in the foreign jurisdiction where there are no rights but only privileges the same as if one voluntarily joins the Army. George Gordon explains that if a person is feeling depressed and goes to the insane asylum and tells the nice lady at the desk about it and checks himself into the institution, and after a couple of weeks on Prozac he’s feeling better, he cannot check himself out without the institution’ s permission. Under federal law, the only way a US citizen can remove himself from the insane asylum after checking himself in is by expatriation in accordance with its codified rules and regulations. You can expatriate from the jurisdiction of United States by declaring allegiance to a foreign country. The United States is a foreign corporation with respect to Iowa and Michigan. My formal declaration of allegiance to the country of Iowa, with explicit declaration of expatriation from the admiralty jurisdiction of the United States, falls smack under United States Code Section 1481 (a) (2), as the jurisdiction of the United States is foreign to the common law jurisdiction of Iowa. We were born to US citizens and a birth certificate was obtained for us and we were registered as US citizens. We were then the State’s child and we could be removed from our parents at any time under equitable proceedings for the best interest of the child. Why were we were never taught by State certified teachers that if we wanted to be free as our ancestors we needed to take appropriate action to achieve the status as free men under common law in the Republic when we reached 21 (and now 18 years of age.) If we had taken appropriate action we would be “non-taxpayers” as Citizens of the state of the Union in which we were born and we would be capital [C] Citizens of the (several) United States as designated in the Constitution and not small [c] citizens. Fifty dollar bills are legal tender in the jurisdiction of the United States and in its 1857 sub-corporation named “The State of Iowa” with its capitol in Des Moines. Fifty dollar gold coins are lawful money under Article I, Section 10 of the federal Constitution within the common law jurisdiction of the 1846 state called Iowa whose capitol is in Iowa City. The capitol in Iowa City sits empty because basically all the free people in the Republic have expatriated to the jurisdiction of the United States and under the Fourteenth Amendment are citizens of its sub division “State of Iowa” and subject to the jurisdiction of its statutes. As subjects most people elect representatives to pass such things as seat belt laws and driver license statutes for their insurance companies that insure them. Free men practice strict liability under the common law, and don’t affect any public interest whatsoever. When a free man of the Republic is dragged into court it will be presumed that he is a subject with a social security number thereby affecting a public interest and needs to be regulated under public policy. This presumption needs to be properly destroyed if we want to be free. I believe that the “state of Iowa” was created with its 1846 Constitution and is the Republic while the 1857 “State of Iowa” is a federal State for passing law on US citizens like Puerto Rico is the proper name of a part of the United States. I’m sure a US citizen and a resident of the “State of Iowa” under the Fourteenth Amendment could just move to Puerto Rico and become a Fourteenth Amendment citizen of Puerto Rico with the same US privileges there, and have the same Form 1040 tax obligations there, or vice versa. US citizens that are residents of the State of Iowa are subject to statutes that are in derogation of the common law while free men in the Republic are not. Statutes in derogation of the common law law are advisory with respect to free men. Iowa Code Section 4.2 states: “The rule of the common law, that statutes in derogation thereof are to be strictly construed, has no application to this Code. Its provisions and all proceedings under it shall be liberally construed with a view to promote its objects and assist the parties in obtaining justice.” This means that an Iowa statute must bend when dealing with a free man if the free man knows how not to consent to be prosecuted under one of these statutes. There is definitely a dual system between the states united under the Constitution and the United States that is analogous to a mini-United Nations and headquartered in DC The US income tax system is a voluntary system and it is voluntary because it is predicated upon “citizenship” . “The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessment and collection. They relate to taxpayers and not to non taxpayers. The latter are without their scope. No procedure is prescribed for non-taxpayers and no attempt is made to annul any of their rights and remedies in due course of law. With them Congress does not assume to deal, and they are neither the subject nor the object of the revenue laws.” Stewart v. Chinese Chamber of Commerce, 168 F.2d 709, 712. Again, you can see the dual system. US citizens residing in the ‘State of Michigan’ or ‘State of Iowa’ are ‘taxpayers’. This is why in an interview Harry Reid stated that he did not understand the phraseology when talking about the voluntary income tax system and was then asked if he meant that “taxpayers” don’t have to pay their income taxes. To most ignorant people Harry Reid looked like a blubbering idiot when he did not come right out and specifically let the cat out of the bag. The Supreme Court has opined that the 16th Amendment added no new taxing powers, but I contend that the Fourteenth Amendment did add new taxing powers for those people within the states and wishing to be “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” so they can receive US socialized security or food stamps or “free?” State education for their children. Being completely free and residing in the Creator who endows men with certain unalienable rights, and not residing in the State for security, is a very scary thing for most people! It wasn’t always so scary when neighbors took care of neighbors in need, but with US citizenship everyone thinks the government should pick up the task. And the problem is you can’t be partially free in the Democracy that the founding fathers never had a good word for, nor put Democracy in the Constitution. Being partially free is like a woman being partially pregnant. Old Ben Franklyn indicated, “He who would give up liberty for a little security deserves neither. Because people look back at the freedom our ancestors had while still enjoying constitutionally secured rights in their state, and want to also live in freedom but are now “voluntarily” subject to the jurisdiction that was foreign respecting our ancestors, the United States now has 5 1/2 times the prison rate compared to the next closest sovereignty in the family of nations, [T]he Peoples Republic of China. A foreign US citizen doing any business within a state is deemed to be in interstate commerce and thereby subject to the commerce clause in the Constitution. I am convinced that to be free we need to first achieve our status as sovereigns in our states, abstain from interstate commerce over which the United States has delegated authority, and then as free men we have to appropriately break that foreign jurisdiction in its court system that is operating here in lieu of exercising jurisdiction at law. This foreign jurisdiction is the antithesis of the common law of the states. Even if we have the status of free men, judges and magistrates will continue to operate upon presumption that we are subject to their statutory law. The judges operate under this law, to wit: “Whenever the Code creates a “presumption” with respect to a fact, or provides that a fact is “presumed,” the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact unless and until evidence is introduced that supports a finding of its nonexistence. ” I believe that we, as sovereign free people, need to vey timely and properly challenge the jurisdiction of these courts without ever pleading into their foreign jurisdiction with a “not guilty” plea, nor ever allowing the judge to plead us into his foreign jurisdiction as if we are his subjects, and we need to properly submit evidence to the trier of fact that shows our status as free men to break the presumption that we are subject to his statutes within the jurisdiction under which he operates. Howard Freeman used to pose the following question to the judges while equity has no cognizance of criminal matters, “This court has two criminal jurisdictions. One is a common law jurisdiction and the other is a condition of contract under the criminal aspects of an admiraly jurisdiction. Under which jurisdiction is this court planning to try this case?” A soldier in the Army is in admiralty jurisdiction by his enlistment contract and if he doesn’t peel potatoes when the sargent say so, it is criminal. The Bible says: “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.” I always tell the grandkids, “Ignorance can be cured, but stupidity is forever.” And boy have I overcome a bunch of ignorance in about the last 10 months after spending some time in jail and putting information from George Gordon, Bill Thorton, and others together in my head.

EL Proyecto Avalon en Yale FACULTAD DE DERECHO

The Avalon Project at Yale Law School International Organizations Immunities Act, December 9, 1945 AN ACT To extend certain privileges, exemptions, and immunities to international organizations and to the officers and employees thereof, and for other purposes Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, TITLE I SECTION 1. For the purposes of this title, the term “international organization” means a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation, and which shall have been designated by the President through appropriate Executive order as being entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions, and immunities herein provided. The President shall be authorized, in the light of the functions performed by any such international organization, by appropriate Executive order to withhold or withdraw from any such organization or its officers or employees any of the privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided for in this title (including the amendments made by this title) or to condition or limit the enjoyment by any such organization or its officers or employees of any such privilege, exemption, or immunity. The President shall be authorized, if in his judgment such action should be justified by reason of the abuse by fin international organization or its officers and employees of the privileges, exemptions, and immunities herein provided or for any other reason, at any time to revoke the designation of any international organization under this section, whereupon the international organization in question shall cease to be classed as an international organization for the purposes of this title. SEC. 2. International organizations shall enjoy the status, immunities, exemptions, and privileges set forth in this section, as follows: (a) International organizations shall, to the extent consistent with the instrument creating them, possess the capacity- (i) to contract; (ii) to acquire and dispose of real and personal property; (iii) to institute legal proceedings. (b) International organizations, their property and their assets, wherever located, and by whomsoever held, shall enjoy the same immunity from suit and every form of judicial process as is enjoyed by foreign governments, except to the extent that such organizations may expressly waive their immunity for the purpose of any proceedings or by the terms of any contract. (c) Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable. (d) Insofar as concerns customs duties and internal-revenue taxes imposed upon or by reason of importation, and the procedures in connection therewith; the registration of foreign agents; and the treatment of official communications, the privileges, exemptions, and immunities to which international organizations shall be entitled shall be those accorded under similar circumstances to foreign governments. SEC. 3. Pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Commissioner of Customs with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, the baggage and effects of alien officers and employees of international organizations, or of aliens designated by foreign governments to serve as their representatives in or to such organizations, or of the families, suites, and servants of such officers, employees, or representatives shall be admitted (when imported in connection with the arrival of the owner) free of customs duties and free of internal-revenue taxes imposed upon or by reason of importation. SEC. 4. The Internal Revenue Code is hereby amended as follows: (a) Effective with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1943, section 116 (c), relating to the exclusion from gross income of income of foreign governments, is amended to read as follows: “(C) INCOME OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS AND OF INTERNATIONAL, ORGANIZATIONS.-The income of foreign governments or international organizations received from investments in the United States in stocks, bonds, or other domestic securities, owned by such foreign governments or by international organizations, or from interest on deposits, in banks in the United States of moneys belonging to such foreign. governments or international organizations, or from any other source within the United States.” (b) Effective with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1943, section 116 (h) (1), relating to the exclusion from gross income of amounts paid employees of foreign governments, is amended to read as follows: “(1) RULE, FOR EXCLUSION.-Wages, fees, or salary of any employee of a foreign government or of an international organization or of the Commonwealth of the Philippines (including a consular or other officer, or a non-diplomatic representative), received as compensation for official services to such government,. international organization, or such Commonwealth- ” (A) If such employee is not, a citizen of the United States, or is a citizen of the Commonwealth of the Philippines (whether or not a citizen of the United States); and ” (B) If, in the ease of an employee of a foreign government or of the Commonwealth of the Philippines, the services are of a character similar to those performed by employees of the Government of the United States in foreign countries or in the Commonwealth of the Philippines, as the case may be; and ” (C) If, in the case of an employee of a foreign government or the Commonwealth of the Philippines, the foreign government or the Commonwealth grants an equivalent exemption to employees of the, Government of the United States performing similar services in such foreign country or such Commonwealth, as the case may be.” (e) Effective January 1, 1946, section 1426 (b), defining the term “emploviiient” for the purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, is amended (1) by striking out the word “or” at the end of paragraph (14), (2) by striking out the period at the end of paragraph (15) and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon and the word “or”, and (3) by inserting at the end of the subsection the following new paragraph: (16) Service performed in the employ of an international organization.” (d) Effective January 1, 1946, section 1607 (c), defining the term “employment” for the purposes of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, is amended (1) by striking out the word “or” at the end of paragraph (14), (2) by striking out the period at the end of paragraph (15) and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon and the word “or”, and (3) by inserting at the end of the subsection the following new paragraph: ” (16) Service performed in the employ of an international organization.” (e) Section 1621 (a) (5), relating to the definition of “wages” for the purpose of collection of income tax at the source, is amended by inserting after the words “foreign government” the words “or an international organization”. (f) Section 3466 (a), relating to exemption from communications taxes is amended by inserting immediately after the words “the District of Columbia” a comma and the words “or an international organization”. (g) Section 3469 (f) (1), relating to exemption from the tax on transportation of persons ., is amended by inserting immediately after the words “the District of Columbia” a comma and the words “or an international organization”. (h) Section 3475 (b) (1), relating to exemption from the tax on transportation of property, is amended by inserting immediately after the words “the District of Columbia” a comma and the words “or an international organization”. (i) Section 3797 (a), relating to definitions, is amended by adding at the end thereof a new paragraph as follows: (18) INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION.-The term ‘international organization’ means a public International organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under the International Organizations Immunities Act.” SEC. 5. (a) Effective January 1, 1946, section 209 (b) of the Social Security Act, defining the term “employment” for the purposes of title 11 of the Act, is amended (1) by striking out the word “or” at the end of paragraph (14), (2) by striking out the period at the end of paragraph (15) and insertiDg in lieu thereof a semicolon and the word “or”, and (3) by inserting at the end of the subsection the following new paragraph: ” (16) Service performed in the employ of an international organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under the International Organizations Immunities Act.” (b) No tax sliall be collected under title VIII or IX of the Social Security Act or under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act or the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, with respect to services rendered prior to January 1., 1946, which are described in paragraph (16) of sections 1426 (6) and 1607 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and any such tax heretofore collected (including penalty and interest with respect thereto, if any) shall be refunded in accordance with the provisions of law applicable in the case of erroneous or illegal collection of the tax. No interest shall be allowed or paid on the amount of any such refund. No payment shall be made under title 11 of the Social Security Act with respect to services rendered prior to January 1, 1946, which are described in paragraph (16) of section 209 (b) of such Act, as amended. SEC. 6. International organizations shall be exempt from all property taxes imposed by, or under the authority of, any Act of Congress, including such Acts as are applicable solely to the District of Columbia or the Territories. SEC. 7. (a) Persons designated by foreign governments to serve as their representatives in or to international organizations and the officers and employees of such organizations, and members of the immediate families of such representatives, officers, and employees residing with them, other than nationals of the United States, shall, insofar as concerns laws regulating entry into and departure from the United States, alien registration and fingerprinting, and the registration of foreign agents, be entitled to the same privileges, exemptions, and immunities as are accorded under similar circumstances to officers and employees, respectively, of foreign governments, and members of their families. (b) Representatives of foreign governments in or to international organizations and officers and employees of such organizations shall be immune from suit and legal process relating to acts performed by them in their official capacity and falling within their functions as such representatives, officers, or employees except insofar as such immunity may be waived by the foreign government or international organization concerned. (c) Section 3 of the Immigration Act approved May 26, 1924, as amended (USC, title 8, sec. 203), is hereby amended by striking out the period at the end thereof and inserting in lieu thereof a comma and the following: “and (7) a representative of a foreign government in or to an international organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under the International Organizations Immunities Act, or an alien officer or employee of such an international organization, and the family, attendants, servants, and employees of such a representative, officer, or employee”. (d) Section 15 of the Immigration Act approved May 26, 1924, as amended (USC, title 8, see. 215), is hereby amended to read as follows: “SEC. 15. The admission to the United States of an alien excepted from the class of immigrants by clause (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), or (7) of section 3, or declared to be a non-quota immigrant by subdivision (e) of section 4, shall be for such time and under such conditions as may be by regulations prescribed (including, when deemed necessary for the classes mentioned in clause (2), (3), (4), or (6) of section 3 and subdivision (e) of section 4, the giving of bond with sufficient surety, in such sum and containing such conditions as may be by regulati6ns prescribed) to insure that, at the expiration of such time or upon failure to maintain the status under which admitted, he will depart from the United States: Provided, That no alien who has been, or who may hereafter be, admitted into the United States under clause (1) or (7) of section 3, as an official of a foreign government, or as a member of the family of such official, or as a representative of a foreign government in or to an international organization or an officer or employee of an international organization, or as a member of the family of such representative, officer, or employee, shall be required to depart from the United States without the approval of the Secretary of State.” SEC. 8. (a) No person shall be entitled to the benefits of this title unless he (1) shall have been duly notified to and accepted by the. Secretary of State as a representative, officer, or employee; or (2) shall have been designated by the Secretary of State, prior to formal notification and acceptance, as a prospective representative, officer, or employee; or (3) is a member of the family or suite, or servant, of one of the foregoing accepted or designated representatives, officers, or employees. (b) Should the Secretary of State determine that the continued presence in the United States of any person entitled to the benefits of this title is not desirable, he shall so inform the foreign government or international organization concerned, as the case may be, and after such person shall have had a reasonable length of time, to be determined by the Secretary of State, to depart from the United States, he shall cease to be entitled to such benefits. (e) No person shall, by reason of the provisions of this title, be considered as receiving diplomatic status or as receiving any of the privileges incident thereto other than such as are specifically set forth herein. SEC. 9. The privileges, exemptions, and immunities of international organizations and of their officers and employees, and members of their families, suites, and servants, provided for in this title, shall be granted notwithstanding the fact that the similar privileges, exemptions, and immunities granted to a foreign government, its officers, or employees, may be conditioned upon the existence of reciprocity by that foreign government: Provided, That nothing contained in this title shall be construed as precluding the Secretary of State from withdrawing the privileges, exemptions, and immunities herein provided from persons who are nationals of any foreign country on the ground that such country is failing to accord corresponding privileges, exemptions, and immunities to citizens of the United States. SEC. 10. This title may be cited as the “International Organizations Immunities Act”. TITLE II SEC. 201. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CLAIMING CREDIT OR REFUND WITH RESPECT TO WAR LOSSES. If a claim for credit or refund under the internal revenue laws relates to an overpayment on account of the deductibility by the taxpayer of a loss in respect of property considered destroyed or seized under section 127 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code (relating to war losses) for a taxable year beginning in 1941 or 1942, the three-year period of limitation prescribed in section 322 (b) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code shall in no event expire prior to December 31, 1946. In the case of such a claim filed on or before December 31, 1946, the amount of the credit or refund may exceed the portion of the tax paid within the period provided in section 322 (b) (2) or (3) of such code, whichever is applicable, to the extent of the amount of the overpayment attributable to the deductibility of the loss described in this section. Sec.. 202. CONTRIBUTIONS TO PENSION TRUSTS. (a) DEDUCTIONS FOR THE TAXABLE YEAR 1942 UNDER PRIOR INCOME TAX ACTS.-Section 23 (p) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code is amended by striking out the words “January 1, 1943” and inserting in lieu thereof “January 1, 1942”, and by striking out the words “December 31, 1942” and inserting in lieu thereof “December 31, 1941”. (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendment made by this section shall be applicable as if it had been made as a part of section 162 (b) of the Revenue Act of 1942. SEC. 203. PETITION TO THE TAXCOURT OF THE UNITED STATES (a) TIME FOR FILING PETITION.-The second sentences of sections 272 (a) (1), 7032 (a), 871 (a) (1), and 1012 (a) (1), respectively, of the Internal Revenue Code are amended by striking out the parenthetical expression appearing therein and inserting in lieu thereof the following: “(not counting Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday in the District of Columbia as the ninetieth day)”. (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.-The amendments made by this section shall take effect as of September 8, 1945. Approved December 29, 1945
Historical Development of Modern Feudalism: The TRUTH about your status as a slave in America Since 1933 you and all other Americans have been pledged for the debt of the UNITED STATES owed to international bankers, most of whom are foreign to our country. Your credit, labor, productivity and property have been used and is now being used as collateral by the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA without your knowledge or consent. This is legal until you take back your implied consent by a special, lawful process. In fact, you are unknowingly volunteering to be chattel for a mortgage held by financiers from the founding of this nation. Perhaps you infer that the name on the tax statement is yours and so you respond as though it were. This is voluntary servitude. To make this servitude legal it was necessary to “cut a hole in the fence.” No matter that the escape route is hidden, obscured by legal brambles to make escape difficult. That it is not used presumes consent. It is not impossible, just seemingly difficult and even implausible. Your status as a subject is based upon a presumption that if you did not wish to be so encumbered you would use the law to do something about it. As long as you do not use the escape route provided by law it is presumed that you are content to “remain in the pasture and be milked and used as chattel.” This word has the same root as the word, “cattle.” Do you get the picture? Can such a premise be true? It seems totally out of step with everything you and I have ever known about our world, our nation, our government and our relationship to it! Our parents never behaved as though they we were chattel. They dutifully paid their taxes, voted in elections, waved an American flag on the 4th of July. Our teachers taught us about our history, our Declaration of Independence and Constitution, our Revolutionary War, how we fought the greatest army and navy the world had ever seen at the time. Nowhere in our history classes did we encounter any such premise of subjection to a central government that rules our lives. Our civics teacher never told us anything about this. Nothing in our world even hinted that we were subjects to a highly centralized government. Surely this could be true of other peoples, but not of us! For most people this cannot be. The truth cannot be heard because it is too discordant with our entire experience. And yet we can document that George Washington did not chop down a cherry tree, Lincoln did not free the slaves (they became subjects of the Federal District, the District of Columbia), The War with Mexico was begun by General Zachary Taylor’s provocations along the Nueces River, the battleship Maine blew up from the inside, Woodrow Wilson knew that the Lusitania was carrying US munitions to the war in Europe and would be sunk, Franklin D. Roosevelt had maneuvered the Japanese into an attack on Pearl Harbor and had cut fuel shipments to the Pacific fleet to ensure the presence of enough old ships to offer a tempting target, Truman knew that there were other good alternatives to an invasion of Japan and did not need to drop the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Roosevelt knew about the NAZI concentration camps, LBJ knew that there was no attack on the Maddox and Turner Joy in the Gulf of Tonkin when he asked for a Congressional Resolution to attack North Vietnam, and the US governm ent had been warned by numerous documented sources that there would be an attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. All of this is from documented historical sources. Yet we continue to believe the myths that are in our histories, our movies, our mainstream media and our mass consciousness. John F Kennedy warned us that, The great enemy of the Truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive and realistic. You will probably find it hard to accept that you have been living in an illusion for your whole life. Much of what you believe is an illusion and you will only find your freedom when you can allow yourself to look behind the veils of illusion to see Reality. WHO you are is far greater than “what” you perceive yourself to be. When you have the courage to stand face-to-face with the illusion and call it what it is, you will have stepped through the most difficult task set before you on your Earth Journey. There IS a way out! But the only way out is through—through understanding how we came to this predicament and following a precise formula to obtain your sovereignty. We have been warned repeatedly throughout our history, but we weren’t listening very closely. Now we might have one more chance to take back our power and our sovereignty. The nature of the conspiracy to defraud can be best understood in comments by one of the major conspirators in the triumph of establishing the Federal Reserve, “Colonel” Edward Mandell House, who is purported to have said this in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson: “[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, foreve r to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call `Social Insurance.’ Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” We now know how to respond to this treasonous fraud. All my life I’ve looked for the roots of war, injustice and oppression because if we can find the basis of the rampant injustice in the world, we could relieve enormous struggle and suffering. I’ve wondered at how little the Constitution seemed to affect the courts and how often the truth was buried in silence. Mostly I saw greed and heartlessness in a power struggle played out in politics. But I didn’t realize that the game had been played in secret throughout American history. And ultimately, it is a game of monetary policy and politics…. with a spiritual component. Like you, I’ve watched and participated in the American scene for many years. I’ve written many letters to the editor, congressmen, senators, presidents, distributed campaign liter ature to precincts, represented my precinct at county conventions, served food at Loaves and Fishes, planted flowers at the feet of police threatening to arrest those who had taken over HUD homes designated for the homeless, worked with Welfare Moms, served as chairman of church social ministry, fasted, spoke to churches on social justice, supported the protestors at Honeywell demonstrations against the manufacture of cluster bombs, arrested for a war toy protest, booked, finger-printed, arraigned, marched in protest of the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, and the attacks on Serbia and Kosovo. A Peak into the Mind of a Tory In 1999 I watched in utter amazement as the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the Florida State Supreme Court’s decision to proceed with a recount of the contested ballots and the Eleventh District Court decision to uphold the decision of the Florida court. In Orwellian doublespeak, Antonin Scalia wrote on Saturday, December 9, 1999: “the counting of the votes that are of questionable legality does in my view threaten irreparable harm to [Bush], and to the country, by casting a cloud upon which he claims to be the legitimacy of his election. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic stability requires.” It was a brazen and Orwellian declaration. What American who believes in democracy could claim that something was wrong with counting votes “first”? What American who believes in democracy could declare one candidate the winner and protect him from “irreparable harm” if a vote count showed him not to be the winner, after all? Of course, it doesn’t make any sense, unless you realize the foundation upon which Scalia based his transparently partisan remarks. He doesn’t believe in democracy, he doesn’t even believe in republicanism, he is a monarchist. Scalia revealed his true motivations when he spoke on the subject of capital punishment at the University of Chicago (February 2002). During his remarks, he stated: “The reaction of people of faith to this tendency of democracy to obscure the divine authority behind government should not be resignation to it, but the resolution to combat it as effectively as possible.” (“God’s Justice and Ours” at http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0205/articles/scalia.html ) Democracy obscuring divine authority behind government? Perhaps this helps shed some light on why Scalia and the four other right-wing “justices” could so easily subvert our election process and, through an act of divine intervention, usher the son onto the throne lost some eight years earlier by his father, George I. We are assuming that we are still independent sovereigns and freemen as declared by our Declaration of Independence and that the Constitution is still in effect. Scalia has no such illusion. History supports his position, sorry to say. Scalia is an ideologue so accustomed to our willingness to continue to be subjects that he does not even consider the ideal of a government of, by, and for the people. That ideal has remained as useful fiction to be taught in Civics classes and mouthed by the politicians. HE KNOWS that we are mere chattel by presumption. Since we have not even discovered that our status as freemen has been lost through more than two hundred years of our history, much less withdrawn our implied consent to be subjects, we are presumed to be subjects before the courts and in the minds of people like Scalia. Scalia speaks of civil disobedience with contempt and quotes the Bible, “Ye must needs be subject.” We must, as mere servants of the ruling class, acquiesce to our divinely guided leaders. For who are we, as mere subjects, to question those who make (or interpret) the laws? After all, he says that “government carries the sword as ‘the minister of God,’ to ‘execute wrath’ upon the evildoer.” No, he has not reverted to a justice of another time—WE have by our ignorance and silence, acquiesced to a lower status reminiscent of another time. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>There you have it!</span> ¡Ahi tienes!</span> In his eyes, we are subjects unworthy of honor, peace and justice. Somehow Scalia’s statements seem like a long way from the Declaration of Independence in which Americans stood before the world as sovereigns invested with certain inalienable rights, including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. After the American Revolution, the monarchies of Europe saw Democracy as an unnatural, ungodly, ideological threat, every bit as radical and dangerous as Communism was regarded by Western nations upon its inception. Just as the 1917 Communist Revolution in Russia spawned other revolutions around the world, the American Revolution provided an example and incentive for people all over the world to overthrow their European monarchies. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>What has happened?</span> ¿Lo que ha sucedido?</span> When did we give up our natural, God-given rights? Our forefathers fought and won that war didn’t they? Sovereignty, Revolution, Birth of a New Nation Yes, our forefathers fought one of the bloodiest wars in history and won their independence. They understood the historical roots of war, injustice and oppression, and we’ve lost this knowledge. Our history books did, indeed, leave out a lot of the truth and lied about much of the rest. History teachers often teach history in such a way that young students swear to never again study history! When I attempted to teach American History from sources outside the history books I was forced from my 26-year teaching career by my principal. We have been led and lulled to forget WHO we are. All this has been engineered by those who would keep us ignorant of the truth. The primary reason for the War for Independence was not “taxation without representation”, but the forced payment of taxes to the King in gold instead of paper money. America was flourishing by using her own “fiat money” system based only on production, not a gold-based system that could be manipulated by the King. The King could not “control” the fiat money system and therefore passed a law requiring that taxes be paid in gold only. The King had most of the gold—the colonies had little; so unemployment ensued—and embittered colonists cried for war. Benjamin Franklin put it this way, “The colonies would have gladly born the little tax on tea, and other matters, had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money.” Prior to the Revolutionary War, The Times of London said this regarding fiat money in America: “If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origins in North America, shall become endurrated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains and the wealth of all the countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every Monarchy on the globe.” The truth is that the Revolution failed. You might say that we won a military victory over the most powerful military force on the planet at the time. However, reading the Treaty of Paris it is clear that we were not exactly negotiating as equals. We had won the recall of British troops but not the bankers. Even though we are taught that we won our independence from England, we actually were able to remain free from the international bankers for only a few years at the close of the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The most visible of the power structure was the East India Company owned by the bankers and the Crown in London, England. This was an entirely private enterprise whose flag was adopted by Queen Elizabeth in 1600—thirteen red and white horizontal stripes with a blue rectangle in its upper left-hand corner. All debts owed before the war were to be collected by the foreign creditors. When the creditors of the new nation found the Articles of Confederation to be inadequate to exact payment from their young debtor, the Constitution was written and supported by the bankers through their associates, for increase their control over the United States of America. Had the Articles of Confederation been completed and adopted, instead of the Constitution, the bankers would have had far less control. Any constitution must have some prior reference to establish its foundation. The authority for the American Constitution is based upon the Bible; the Magna Carta, signed in 1215 by King John; the Petition of Rights, granted by King Charles I in 1628; the English Bill of Rights, granted by William and Mary in 1689; the right of habeas corpus, granted by King Charles II, and the Articles of Confederation. Any and every constitution thereafter must have an enabling clause. From this point onward, no constitution may diminish, in any manner, those rights already established in the above six documents. The Declaration of Independence established that all people are sovereign under God’s Natural Law. Sovereign people of the various states, created the state governments for the protection of their rights. They delegated certain authority from the people’s powers by and through the state constitutions in order that the three branches of government could properly carry out the dictates outlined in the State constitutions to protect our rights. The States then created the United States. The American Constitution created a new structure of government that was established on a much higher plane than either the parliamentary system or the confederation of states. It was a people’s “constitutional republic,” where a certain amount of power was delegated to the states and a certain amount was delegated to the federal government. The United States, by way of the Congress of the United States, has certain powers delegated by the Constitution. So far as the several States party to the Constitution are concerned, the United States may not exercise power not delegated by the Constitution. All power not delegated to the United States by the Constitution is reserved to the several States within their respective territorial borders—or, to the people. British Subversion, Banks, and Treason Even though the Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War in 1783, the simple fact of our existence threatened the monarchies where it hurts most: financially. The United States stood as a heroic role model for other nations, which inspired them to also struggle against oppressive monarchies. The French Revolution (1789-1799) and the Polish uprising (1794) were, in part, encouraged by the American Revolution. Though we stood like a beacon of hope for most of the world, the monarchies regarded the United States as a political infection, the principle source of radical democracy that was destroying monarchies around the world. The monarchies realized that if the principle source of that infection could be destroyed, the rest of the world might avoid the contagion and the monarchies would be saved. Knowing they couldn’t destroy us militarily, they resorted to more covert methods of political and financial subversion, employing spies and secret agents skilled in bribery and legal deception; it was perhaps the first “cold war.” In the 1794 Jay Treaty, the United States agreed to pay £600,000 sterling to King George III, as reparations for the American Revolution. The US Senate ratified the treaty in secret session and ordered that it not be published. When Benjamin Franklin’s grandson published it anyway (perhaps our first whistleblower), the exposure and resulting public up-roar so angered the Congress that it passed the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) so federal judges could prosecute editors and publishers for reporting the truth about the government. Since we supposedly had won the Revolutionary War, why would our Senators agree to pay reparations to the loser? And why would they agree to pay £600,000 sterling, eleven years after the war ended? It doesn’t make sense, especially in light of the Senate’s secrecy and later fury over being exposed… unless we assume our Senators had been bribed to serve the British monarchy and betray the American people! That is treason! From the beginning, the United States Bank had been opposed by the Democratic-Republicans lead by Thomas Jefferson, but the Federalists (the pro-monarchy party) won the vote. The initial capitalization was $10,000,000 — 80 % of which would be owned by foreign bankers. Since the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,000,000 (double its paid capital), it was a profitable deal for both government and the bankers, since they could lend, and collect interest on $10,000,000 that didn’t exist. However, the European bankers outfoxed the US government, and by 1796, the US government owed the bank $6,200,000 and was forced to sell most of its shares. By 1802, our government owned no stock in the United States Bank! Thomas Jefferson had warned, If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered…. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. Several short-lived attempts to impose the central banking scheme on the United States were defeated by the patriotic efforts of Presidents Madison, Jefferson, Jackson, Van Buren and Lincoln. Bank Fraud, Bribery, and Corruption Chief among the international financiers was Amshel Bauer of Germany who, in 1748 opened a goldsmith shop under the name of Red Shield. (in German the name is spelled Rothschild and is pronounced Rote-shilld). In 1787, Amshel (Bauer) Rothschild made the famous statement: “Let me issue and control a Nation’s money, and I care not who writes the laws.” He had five Sons Amshel Mayer, Solomon, Jacob, Nathan, and Carl. In 1798, the five Rothschild brothers expanded by opening banks in Germany, Vienna, Paris, London, and Naples. The objective behind this bank was to receive special privilege to use the unjust fractional reserve banking to print money and loan it to the government and industry. No money could go into circulation without interest being paid to the bankers. Fractional reserve banking is very simple. It is simply a special privilege given to a man or group of men to create credit out of thin air; by extending this credit/debt to everyone else in society who does not have the same privilege, and then collecting from society the money plus interest, they become very rich without having to produce anything of value. The basic mathematics behind this system is very clear. If this system is left in place long enough, the man or group who controls this system of debt creation will own all the gold available in the nation. Once the supply of real money (gold) is in his or their hands, this man or group of men becomes the master of the entire nation. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why?</span> ¿Por qué?</span> Because this man or group of men controls the only source of operating medium (money) available through which the nation functions. Only the man who has the privilege of printing the money and loaning it at interest can determine who gets special funding—his friends and allies. Everyone else is limited to how much money they have access to; therefore, after two or three generations, the friends and allies of this “banker” will own all of the nation—just as America is now owned by a very small cadre of very wealthy men. How long this process takes to work its way through the wealth of the nation depends upon how successful the “banker” is in forcing, through bribery and corruption, the restriction of the formal government’s issuance of real money backed by gold or silver. As the supply of real money shrinks, the people of the nation are forced to rely on the creation of a fictitious debt by the privileged few to a greater and greater extent, until finally, the only thing left is a massive amount of “unpayable debt,” created from nothing and consisting only of the interest charged upon the fictitious debt, and collecting interest for every moment of its existence. All for the benefit of the privileged, who become the de facto (illegally usurped) government because of the “money power” they wield. Through the Bank of England, the Rothschilds demanded a private bank in the United States to hold the securities of the United States as the pledged assets to the Crown of England in order to secure the debt to which our government had defaulted. As one of his first acts, President Washington declared a financial emergency. William Morris with the help of Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, heavily promoted the creation a private bank to service the debt to the international bankers. In 1791, Congress chartered the first national bank for a term of 20 years, to hold the securities of the same European bankers who had been holding the debts before the war. The bankers loaned worthless, un-backed, non-secured printed money to each other to charter this first bank. In December 12, 1791, the Bank of the United States opened its doors in Philadelphia. The holder of the securities was the private bank. So under public international law, the creditor nation forced the United States to establish a private bank to hold the securities as the collateral for the national debt. James Madison had warned, “History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” British Subversion, Titles of Nobility and Treason For the early decades of US history, relations between the United States and Great Britain remained strained. Their relationship deteriorated sharply with the outbreak of war in Europe in 1803. Britain imposed a blockade on neutral countries such as the United States. In addition, the British took American sailors from their ships and forced them to serve in the British Navy. Concerned about the many English spies and troublemakers, Congress passed an amendment to prevent those who had English titles and connections from obtaining any seat in government. Called the Titles of Nobility Act (TONA), it reads as follows: “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” All “titles of nobility” were prohibited in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation (1777) and in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution of the United States (1778), but there was no penalty. Although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional “title of nobility” amendment was deemed necessary and was proposed in 1789, again in 1810, and finally ratified in 1819. But the notice of ratification delivered to the Secretary of State, an attorney with the title, “Esquire,” disappeared. As a result, there still is no penalty for accepting titles or emoluments from foreign rulers today, just the prohibition. Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a serious threat in “titles of nobility” and “honours,” that anyone receiving them would be required to forfeit their citizenship. Obviously the Amendment carried much more significance for our founding fathers than is readily apparent today. They knew that our freedom could be subverted from inside our government and had sought to prevent such a bitter betrayal. Today most Senators and Congressmen, all Federal judges, and some of our Presidents are attorneys who carry the title “Esquire” often abbreviated as “Esq.” The Constitution still forbids this, nevertheless. In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys, but most held no “title of nobility” or “honor.” There was no requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney general, or judge; a citizen’s “counsel of choice” was not restricted to a lawyer and there was no state or national bar associations. The only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England, headquartered in London. Lawyers admitted to the IBA received the rank “Esquire” – a “title of British nobility.” “Esquire” was the principle title of nobility which the 13th Amendment ought to prohibit from the United States. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why?</span> ¿Por qué?</span> Because the loyalty of “Esquire” lawyers was suspect! Lawyers with an “Esquire” behind their names were agents of the monarchy, members of an organization whose principle purposes were political and regarded with the same wariness that some people today reserve for members of the KGB or the CIA. The archaic definition of “honor” (as used when the 13th Amendment was ratified) meant anyone “obtaining or having an advantage or privilege over another.” A contemporary example of an “honor” granted to only a few Americans is the privilege of being a judge: Lawyers can be judges and exercise the attendant privileges and powers, non-lawyers generally cannot. We address the judge as, “your Honor.” By prohibiting “honors,” the missing, but now found, original 13th amendment prohibits any advantage or privilege that would grant some citizens an equal opportunity to achieve or exercise political power. Therefore, the second meaning (intent) of the original 13th Amendment was to insure political equality among all American citizens, by prohibiting anyone, even government officials, from claiming or exercising a special privilege or power (an “honor”) over other citizens. Both “esquire” and “honor” would be key targets of the 13th Amendment even today, because, while “titles of nobility” no longer apply now precisely as they did back in the early 1800’s, it is clear that an “esquire” or bar attorney receives far better treatment in and by the courts as well as by the public at large in general, whereas if you represent yourself (pro se) or speak as a freeman (pro per), you are treated as though you were rabble. Your opinions are of little importance in court and you are often treated similarly by government officials. Because you are not “esquires” or bar attorneys, you are considered to be a useless eater, a subject “out of control.” The concept of “honor” remains relevant, possibly more so today than at any previous time in US history, for they, the “honors,” are greatly feared and even revered, even by the esquires who are considered to be below them. Since the Original 13th Amendment has never been repealed, all acts of government since 1819 are technically null and void since most lawmakers, prohibited from participation in government by the Constitution and who should even be stripped of their right to be a US Citizen under TONA, have continued to interject themselves into the political process. When the people discovered that European banking interests owned most of the United States Bank they saw the sheer power of the banks and their ability to influence representative government by economic manipulation and outright bribery. On February 20, 1811, Congress therefore refused to renew the Bank’s charter on the grounds that the Bank was unconstitutional. This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000 in specie (money in coin) by European investors, which in turn, precipitated an economic recession, and the War of 1812. This “war” was punishment for America refusing to do business on the terms of the International Banking families of the House of Rothschild, through the first Bank of the United States. Congress refused to let the National Bank renew its Charter. Except for Gen. Andrew Jackson’s victory in the Battle of New Orleans, the War of 1812 produced a string of American military disasters. The most shocking of these was the British Army’s burning of the Capitol, the President’s house, and other public buildings in Washington on August 24 and 25, 1814. (Americans had previously burned public buildings in Canada.) During the War of 1812 our national archives and many libraries and document repositories were burned and some of the evidence of the TONA disappeared. Nevertheless, the legislature of Virginia ratified the amendment and it was subsequently printed in many official publications as the 13th Amendment, even in states which had NOT ratified, such as Connecticut. But beginning in 1832 it began to disappear from texts, although official state publications continued to publish it as late as 1876. There are undoubtedly other examples of the monarchy’s efforts to subvert or destroy the United States; some are common knowledge, others remain to be disclosed to the public. For example, national archivist David Dodge discovered a book called 2 VA LAW in the Library of Congress Law Library. According to Dodge, “This is an un-catalogued book in the rare book section that reveals a plan to overthrow the Constitutional government by secret agreements engineered by the lawyers of the time.” That is one of the reasons why the TONA was ratified by the state of Virginia in the particular manner in which they did, although the alleged “notification” thereof was a long time thereafter claimed to have been “lost in the mail.” You see, there is no public record that this aforementioned book exists either! That may sound surprising, but according to the Gazette (5/10/91), “the Library of Congress has 349,402 un-catalogued rare books and 13.9 million un-catalogued rare manuscripts.” There may be secrets buried in that mass of documents even more astonishing than a missing Constitutional Amendment. Yet this image of documentary disarray appropriately describes our situation today: we are inundated with information that we have not had the time or interest to sort through. As a result we have lost a precious treasure in the chaos and turmoil of daily life: our sovereignty. One amazing aspect of the War of 1812 was the existence of a depression during wartime. War always brings a short-term prosperity, except in the case of this war. To understand this, it is vital for you to know that all depressions and recessions are artificially created through the restriction of a medium of exchange—money. This restriction keeps money OUT of circulation. Fewer dollars available to facilitate production and distribution means poverty and starvation. The precariousness of government finance during the war and the post war recession convinced the Republican government under James Madison, to re-establish a national bank. Thus was created the Second Bank of the United States in 1816. In January 9, 1832 The Second National Bank applied for a charter renewal 4 years early. This time President Andrew Jackson vetoed the Bank’s re-charter on the grounds that the Bank was unconstitutional and he successfully paid off the national debt leaving the US with a surplus of $5,000. He said, “If congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations.” On January 30, 1835, President Andrew Jackson attended a congressional funeral in the Capitol building. As he exited, Richard Lawrence, an unemployed house painter, pointed a pistol at Jackson and fired. The percussion cap exploded, but the bullet did not discharge. The enraged Jackson raised his cane to strike his attacker, who fired again. The second weapon also misfired and the sixty-seven-year-old president escaped assassination at close range. Jackson was convinced that Lawrence was hired by his political enemies, the Whigs, to stop his plan to destroy the Bank of the United States. Andrew Jackson violated public international law because he denied the creditor his just lien rights on the debtor. However, the bankers did not lend value (substance), so in actuality they had an unperfected lien. Therefore the law actually did not apply. The End of the American Republic: the Shadow Government is Born In 1860-61, the Southern states walked out of Congress. This created sine die, a situation in which not enough representatives were present to carry on legislative business. This was a constitutional crisis that the newly elected president, Abraham Lincoln, had to resolve. The Introduction to Senate Report 93-549 (93rd Congress, 1st Session, 1973) summarizes the situation as best as possible: “A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. . . And, in the United States, actions taken by the Government in times of great crises have –from, at least, the Civil War—in important ways, shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency.” From the research information available, it can be reasonably proven that when the Southern states walked out of Congress on March 27, 1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution for the united States of America was lost. Thus, the only votes that Congress could lawfully take, under parliamentary law, were those to set the time to reconvene, take a vote to get a quorum, vote to adjourn and set a date, time, and place to reconvene at a later time, but instead, Congress apparently abandoned the House and Senate without setting a date to reconvene. Under the parliamentary law of Congress, when this happened, Congress became sine die (pronounced see-na dee-a; literally “without day”) and thus when Congress adjourned sine die, it ceased to exist as a lawful deliberative body, and thus the only lawful, constitutional power that could declare war was no longer lawful, or in session. It can also be reasonably proven that the Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the Union, also ceased to exist sine die, and that some state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine die, and thus, all the states which were parties to creating the Constitution for the united States of America apparently ceased to exist. On April 15, 1861, President Lincoln executed an executive order, Lincoln Executive Proclamation 1, and it can also be reasonably proven that the united States of America have been ruled ever since by the President under executive powers. It can also be reasonably proven that when Congress eventually did reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority of the Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies or by Constitutional Law, thus placing the American people under martial rule ever since the “national emergency” declared by President Lincoln. Thus, the Constitution for the united States of America has subsequently temporarily ceased being the acknowledged law of the land in many courts, and the President, Congress, and the courts have unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the Union in a new image, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions were in place which afforded power to any of the actions which were taken which presumed to place the Union under the new form of control. President Lincoln apparently knew that his executive orders no longer had any force under Constitutional Law. So he commissioned General Orders No. 100 (April 24, 1863) apparently as a special code to govern his actions under martial law and to justify the seizure of power, which further extended the laws of the District of Columbia and which also fictionally implemented the provisions of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 17-18 of the Constitution beyond the boundaries of Washington, DC and into the several states. General Orders No. 100, also called the Lieber Instructions and the Lieber Code, have apparently extended the laws of war and private international law into the American states, and the United States government has become the presumed military conqueror of the people and the land of the several American nations. Martial rule has apparently been kept secret and has never really ended. Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete the implementation of his plan to constitutionally and not militarily reform the Southern national governments and restore Congress. Ever since the united States of America has been ruled under military law under the Commander of Chief—the President—and his assumed executive powers according to the policies of Executive Orders: a military dictator type function. Constitutional law under the original Constitution for the American states is apparently enforced only as a matter of keeping the public peace under the provisions of General Orders No. 100 under martial rule. This “peace” is further evidenced in the Preamble of the so-called Expatriation Act of 1868. Under martial law, title is a mere fiction, since all property belongs to the military except for that property which the Commander-in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt from taxation and seizure and upon which he allows the “enemy” to reside. In proclaiming the first Trading with the Enemy Act by Executive Order, President Lincoln set in place the means by which the federal government could interact with Americans who were not 14th Amendment citizens. They could technically be designated as enemies. Are you beginning to understand how We the People could be at odds with our “government?” In a message to Congress December 3, 1861, Abraham Lincoln answered the banker’s argument that the people could not be trusted with their constitutional power, the political and monetary system of free enterprise conceived by our Founding Fathers, by saying: “No men living are more worthy to be trusted than those who toil up from poverty — none less inclined to take or touch aught which they have not honestly earned. Let them beware of surrendering a political power which they already possess, and which if surrendered, will surely be used to close the door of advancement against such as they, and to fix new disabilities and burdens upon them, till all of liberty shall be lost.” In 1865, just before the close of the Civil War, President Lincoln declared his new monetary policy: “The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity…. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government, but it is the governments’ greatest opportunity.” Had it been implemented, it would have ushered in a worldwide economic renewal. Unfortunately, a few weeks after its introduction, Lincoln was assassinated because he defied the bankers in proposing to print interest free money to pay the war debt. Thus, the government continued to operate fully under the authority of private law dictated by the creditor. Since President Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete plans for reforming constitutional government in the Southern States and end the martial rule by executive order, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution has further created a “new citizenship” or “status” for the expanded jurisdiction. Laws for the District of Columbia were proposed and passed by Congress in 1871, the District of Columbia being incorporated as a private, foreign corporation by The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, and all states in the Union were apparently reformed as franchisees or political subdivisions of the corporation known as the UNITED STATES, hence creating a new union of American states. What remained of the government was the private side under the rule of the bankers. The first attempt by Congress to define citizenship was in 1866 in the passage of the Civil Rights Act (Revised Statutes section 1992, 8 United States Code Annotated section 1). The act provided that: “All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power are declared to be citizens of the United States.” And this in turn was followed in 1868 by the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, United States Code Annotated Amendment 14, declaring: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” At this period of time, the only people in the United States who were under the jurisdiction of the private bifurcated government of the ten miles square of Washington, DC, were the government employees, those within the territories owned by the United States and now the former slaves. The former citizens of the South, now “captured” became 14th Amendment citizens. The remainder of the people could still invoke the power over government through original jurisdiction of the Republic side of the Constitution. A new 13th Amendment was enacted December 18, 1865 and the 14th Amendment was enacted July 28, 1868. It was ratified in Southern states under martial law. A state could only obtain its freedom from federal military rule by ratifying this amendment. Any contract entered under duress is null and void. But then the Constitution was not even in effect following sine die and the proclamation of martial law. The 14th Amendment brought the freed slaves, whose previous owners were private plantations and transferred those slaves under subjection of the government, the ten miles square jurisdiction of Washington, DC And it offered its protection to those who would choose to become its subjects…in exchange for their sovereignty. The 14th Amendment is a good example of the “give-a-little, take a lot” strategy that is often used, a sugar coating to a bitter pill. Sovereign Citizens had created a government to guarantee them their rights. In contrast, the federal government created fourteenth amendment citizenship to guarantee its power over its citizens. It seems to be taking citizens under its protection but at the price of servitude. Sovereigns may choose to become subjects; free men and women to become vassals. This amendment has always been controversial. Many people over the years have questioned the amount of power it vests in the federal government. Some have even questioned its validity. On one occasion Judge Ellett of the Utah Supreme Court remarked: “I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the amendment was properly approved and adopted. State v. Phillips, Pacific Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 540, Page 941, 942 (1975) However, the most important fact about this amendment is that, although it created a new class of citizen, it did not have any effect on Sovereign Citizens. Both classes still exist: When the Constitution was adopted the people of the United States were the citizens of the several States for whom and for whose posterity the government was established. Each of them was a citizen of the United States at the adoption of the Constitution, and all free persons thereafter born within one of the several States became by birth citizens of the State and of the United States. Both classes of citizen still exist. It’s your right to be a Sovereign Citizen, while it’s a privilege to be a fourteenth amendment citiz en, and most importantly, it’s up to you to determine which one you are, and which one you want to be. Just remember that you “pay” for a privilege, whereas a right carries no obligation. This is at the heart of your personal Declaration of Independence. Two Governments, Two Flags: the Corporate State Once the smoke settled after the Civil War, European international bankers arrived in town. In 1871 the default again loomed and bankruptcy was imminent. So in 1872, the ten miles square District of Columbia was incorporated in England. A loophole was discovered in the Constitution by cunning lawyers in league with the international bankers. They realized that a separate nation by the same name existed that Congress had created in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. The Congress shall have power: To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten square miles) as may, by cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings; – And To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof. This “United States” is a Legislative “Democracy” within the Constitutional Republic, and is known as the Federal United States. It has exclusive, unlimited rule over its Citizenry, the residents of the District of Colombia, the territories and enclaves (Guam, Midway Islands, Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.), and anyone who is a Citizen by way of the 14th Amendment (naturalized Citizens). Both United States have the same Congress that rules in both nations. One “United States,” the Republic of fifty States, has the “stars and stripes” as its flag, but without any fringe on it. The Federal United States’ flag is the stars and stripes with a yellow fringe, seen in all the courts. The abbreviations of the States of the Continental United States are, with or without the zip codes, Ala., Alas., Ariz., Ark., Cal., etc. The abbreviations of the States under the jurisdiction of the Federal United States, the Legislative Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without any periods). The international bankers and the Congress conjured up this bit of mischief and passed it into law. But whose law? Congress broke faith with We the People in 1871 and sold us out when they formed a private corporation and made it the government of the District of Columbia. They used the Constitution through the 14th Amendment, as their by-laws, therefore taking their authority not under the Constitution but taking their authority over the constitution. They copyrighted not only the constitution but also many related names such as, THE UNITED STATES, US THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USA as their own. This is the final blow to the original constitution. Hence forth, the UNITED STATES has been governed entirely by private corporate law, dictated by the banks as creditors. The “Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” Section 34 of the Forty-First Congress of the United States, Session III, Chapter 61 and 62, enacted February 21, 1871, states that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation, whose jurisdiction is applicable only in the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia and to whatever properties are legally titled to the UNITED STATES, by its registration in the corporate County, State, and Federal governments that are under military power of the UNITED STATES and its creditors. Under this provision, the military Congress of the UNITED STATES had obtained the power to pass private international law for application within the federal District of Columbia. All States of the Union adopted new legislatively created ‘conditions’ and ‘codified’ their laws under federal mandate. State ‘codes’ were unlawfully adopted despite their origin as instruments of sovereign people. However, We the People remained sovereign. UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002(15)(A), basically reiterates that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. What was not said in 1871, but was implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28, 3002(15)(3): That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the corporation. Title 28, UNITED STATES CODE, is Copyrighted Private International Law. Indeed, the UNITED STATES CODE, in its entirety, is Copyrighted Private International Law, and applicable only in the District of Columbia. This incorporation was first reported by Gary W. Phillips, whose career with the Immigration and Naturalization Service began in 1956. He was the INS director at Sea Tac Airport for 20 years and began challenging the income tax in 1985 (The Idaho Observer, March, 2000). After nearly 40 years of government service, Phillips was forced to flee his country to protect his life after exposing the facts of the illegality of the federal government’s criminal income tax collection scam — facts that are becoming well know among informed people throughout the country. Where did the Congress find the authority in the Constitution to reconstitute any part of the united States as a corporation? Quite simply, the 1791 Constitution was set aside to make room for the corporation. Would this Act benefit the Republic? No, the private, corporate bottom line is profit. The municipal, public bottom line is service. To replace our service-oriented form of government with a profit-oriented form of government without our knowledge or consent can only be described as treason. A few superficial changes were made to the original Constitution and it was no longer the real thing. Congress did not change the name of the document so they could claim to be reading from the Constitution. They merely changed it from the Constitution for the united States of America to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They changed the “for” to “of'” and capitalized all the letters. All of the sudden we had two Constitutions, the original for show and the revision for actual use. The Act of 1871 provided a government for the District of Columbia and created a corporation entitled the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA whose jurisdiction extends only over corporate entities created by the municipal corporation and operative only in the District of Columbia. Washington, District of Columbia is the capitol of the District of Columbia, not the United States of America, and all laws passed within the District of Columbia are applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia and it’s possessions. The States of the Republic are not possessions of the District of Columbia. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam are possessions of the District of Columbia as well as property legally titled to the UNITED STATES by states and counties. The UNITED STATES CODE, in totality, was put together in the District of Columbia as Copyrighted Private International Law and is applicable only in the District of Columbia. By their own rules of jurisdiction, the UNITED STATES attorneys have no business prosecuting anyone outside of the District of Columbia or Federal territories. The federal court has no venue outside of the District of Columbia and, therefore, has no jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia and its possessions. The Congress cannot pass a law that is applicable in the several States of the Republic. If all the laws passed in the District of Columbia are Private International Law, including all of the UNITED STATES CODE and the statutes at large passed after 1871, and are applicable and enforceable only in the District of Columbia, then how could they have become the law of the land? Because, not knowing better, We the People allowed it. We have allowed agents of foreign countries to build an illegal corporation that has systematically corrupted every state, county and city in this nation and corrupted the status and standing of most people of the united States of America. The only way that a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT can have jurisdiction over a Sovereign is if the latter volunteers to the jurisdiction or fails to declare his independence as a Sovereign. This corporation has created dozens of agencies, the IRS, FBI, DEA, and the BATF, to name a few, which employ thousands of agents who receive excellent salaries and benefits for betraying their friends and families while enforcing the private edicts of the so-called Congress. The men and women of Congress smile, speak softly, and then direct their illegal agencies to destroy those who do not fully conform to their wishes, and strike fear into hearts of those who do. Kidnapping and conspiracy are involved in every arrest and conviction by federal authorities outside of the District of Columbia. The question now leads to whether our duly elected public officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution for the united States of America, the Republic within which our rights are protected by a service-oriented government, or swear an oath to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the profit-oriented corporation? It appears by their actions that most government employees, knowingly or unknowingly, have sworn an oath to the corporate UNITED STATES. It is our duty as the People who elected them into office, to demand accountability from our “public” officials and confront them as to where their loyalties lie. Is it with the corrupt, treasonous corporation that is controlled by foreign agents from within and without, or is it with our constitutional Republic, the united States of America and her citizens? An articulate defender of a conservative monetary policy, President James A. Garfield urged the resumption of specie payments and the payment of government debts. He said, “Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.” In his Inaugural Address in 1881, Garfield said: The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory circulation. These notes are not money, but promises to pay money. If the holders demand it, the promise should be kept. Garfield was assassinated after only two hundred days in office, 80 days after being shot by a lawyer, ostensibly because he was upset about not receiving an ambassadorial posting to France. In 1909, default loomed once again. The US government asked the Crown of England for an extension of time. This extension was granted for another 20 years on several conditions. One of the conditions was that the United States permit the creditors to establish a new national bank. The bankers moved deeper into our nation by the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913, the IRS to collect the interest on their loans made to the UNITED STATES, and the 17th Amendment enacted May 31, 1913, was the condition for the extension of time. The 16th and 17th Amendment further reduced the states power. The UNITED STATES adopted the mercantile system of ancient Babylonian. With the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the UNITED STATES was firmly lashed to the yoke, so that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the people a yoke little better than slavery itself. That yoke inevitably grows heavier with ever-compounding interest, and totals over $20 trillion of debt owed by the American people today ($80,000 per American). This vast accumulation of wealth concentrates immense power and despotic economic domination in the hands of the few central bankers “who are able to govern credit and its allotment, for this reason supplying, so to speak, the life-blood to the entire economic body, and grasping, as it were, in their hands the very soul of the economy so that no one dare breathe against their will.” A worldwide tyranny is gradually being imposed, hidden to most, by the money masters. First World War In 1917 we were drafted into the First World War. President Woodrow Wilson had to find a way to persuade the American public to go along with an intervention in another of Europe’s wars. Although restrained to be neutral in the deadly conflict by the Neutrality Act, he sent our navy to shepherd British convoys across the Atlantic. German U-boat commanders did not take the bait and avoided contact with the US destroyers. To force the issue, a US naval ship sailed into the midst of a battle between British and German naval fleets and was sunk. But when the truth was learned, Wilson had to find another way. The Lusitania was a speedy warship refitted by the British as a passenger liner. Unknown to its passengers the Lusitania was carrying a huge cargo of military equipment and munitions in violation of the US Neutrality Act. The Germans knew that and tried to warn the passengers by placing advertisements in prominent US newspapers. The US State Department ordered all of the newspapers to refuse the ad. Only one newspaper in Des Moines, Iowa, bravely published the information. To ensure a successful provocation, the Lusitania was ordered to sail at 75% speed using only three of its four powerful engines. Then the naval escort was ordered away leaving the Lusitania vulnerable as it entered the war zone. The first torpedo hit the explosive cargo and blew the bottom out of the Lusitania. It sank in only 18 minutes. 126 innocent civilians died. Wilson now had his provocation to rally Americans behind the “War to End All Wars.” The US participation in WWI exacerbated the national debt so that it became impossible for us to pay it off in 1929. It also enhanced the War Powers Act that President Lincoln, by Executive Order put in place during his Presidency. This War Powers Act was re-enforced and the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 was passed to define, regulate, and punish those who were trading with enemies, who were then required by that act to be licensed by the government to do business. This will become more important later on. The Great Depression: From Sovereignty to Servitude We all know what happened in 1929. This was the year of the stock market crash and the beginning of The Great Depression. The stock market crash moved billions of dollars from the people to the banks. This also removed cash from circulation for the people’s use. Those who still possessed any cash, invested in high interest yielding Treasury Bonds driven higher by increased demand. As a result, even more cash was removed from circulation in the general public to the point where there was not enough cash left in circulation to buy the goods being produced. Production came to a halt as excess inventory overwhelmed the market. There were more products on the market than there was cash to buy them. Prices plummeted and industries plunged into bankruptcy, throwing millions of people out of work. Foreclosures on homes, factories, businesses and farms rose to the highest level in the history of America. A mere dime was literally salvation to many families now living on the street. Millions of people lost everything they had, keeping only the clothes on their backs. In Europe, the International Bankers in 1930 declared several nations bankrupt, including the United States. In 1933, immediately after Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office, his first act as President was to publicly declare the United States bank holiday. He further went on to issue his Presidential Executive Order on March 5th, 1933 that all United States Citizens must turn in all their gold in return for Federal Reserve Notes. This was passed into law by Congress on June 5, 1933. We the People turned in all our gold at that time. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why?</span> ¿Por qué?</span> Were we United States Citizens? No. We were still a sovereign people until that time. We just thought that we were required to turn in all our gold. Only those people living in Washington, DC, and the 14th Amendment Citizens were so required. As sovereigns, we were not under the jurisdiction of the United States of America, which incorporated in 1872. When we turned in our gold, we just volunteered to be citizens of the jurisdiction of the ten miles square of Washington DC and their laws. We became 14th Amendment Citizens. Our birth certificates, the title to our bodies, were registered at the Department of Commercial. This title to our bodies, all of our property and all of our future labor, was pledged to the International Bankers as security for the money owed in bankruptcy. This was done under the authority of commercial law (Babylonian law) by and through Title. The American People were not in bankruptcy. Only the Corporate UNITED STATES was in bankruptcy. But with the US Corporation holding the title to your body and life, you could be used for collateral to secure the national debt through the birth certificate given by parents voluntarily to be entered into the Commercial Registry. This act, in commerce, gave Title to your body by way of a “constructive” contract. Next, the government created an artificial ‘person’ in your name, a corporation, a fictitious entity to take its place in a virtual reality of contract law and corporations. By and through an adhesion contract, the government then made you, the real man or woman, responsible for that fictional entity, a fiduciary and surety for an artificial entity. Your artificial entity secured the National debt and through it, you became a 14th Amendment Citizen of the UNITED STATES. In other words, they got you to think and act as though you really were that fictional entity. You agreed by your action or failure to act. YOU adhered to a contract offer because you thought or acted as though you were the receiver of the offer. In doing so, YOU were presumed to have ACCEPTED THE CONTRACT. All licenses and all existing contracts are made between the UNITED STATES or THE STATE OF (whatever state you live in) and your artificial entity. That fictitious entity binds you to the UNITED STATES and its sub-corporations because they have, through adhesion contract, made you, the real man or woman, fiduciary and responsible for that artificial entity. Of course, you voluntarily sign, and even request, all those contracts, don’t you? It seems to be your name, although you probably never spell it all in capital letters as they do. They wish for you to think nothing of the aberration, perhaps just something they do to be clear and error-free. All of these contracts you sign carry with it your agreement to obey and uphold all the laws, rules and regulations passed by the Congress of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION and THE STATE OF. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>.</span> .</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>.</span> .</span> <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>.</span> .</span> and will be enforced against you. (anything you say CAN and WILL be used against you) From that day forward, We the People, once upon a time sovereigns who created government for our convenience and welfare, could never own property in allodium because the state now had possession of it all. In 1964, the state obtained title to all private property. You can only “rent” homes that you believe you own by paying taxes. You only have a certificate of title to the car you think you own, and you continue to drive it because of your yearly fee. The state owns the true title to our homes, our cars, to everything we thought or think we own. You married the state through your marriage license and your children became wards of the state. All of this was pledged, including all the fruits of your future labor, to the bankers as security against the national debt and was placed in the possession of the Secretary of State of each state as an agent for the Trustee of the Bankruptcy, the US Secretary of Treasury. Not knowing the rules of the game you went directly to jail, you could not pass GO and you could not collect $200. Cows in the Pasture or Freedom: the Hidden Choice The way out of this dilemma can be very complex. In fact, its complexity was intentional. Roosevelt had violated the law by placing us into servitude without our consent. Congressman Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges against the Federal Reserve and the Secretary of the Treasury and was coming dangerously close to calling for impeachment of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Two months AFTER the Executive Order, on June 5, 1933, the Senate and House of Representatives, 73d Congress, 1st Session, at 4:30 pm approved House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192: Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause, Joint Resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States, which formally declared the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES. FDR by Executive Order declared the people outside federal territories to be the enemy by illegally altering the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1861, revised 1918. The creation of Federal Zone citizenship further tightened up when you applied for your Social Security number after 1935. The benefits offered by this contract were hurriedly and voluntarily entered into when the Social Security Act was signed into law. Further contracts were to be entered into and license to be applied for–all voluntary actions. We unknowingly were entering into lifelong servitude to receive the benefits of the Lord of the Manor. We had descended into feudal vassalage without recognizing it. President Roosevelt then called all the Governors into Washington DC for a conference. This was the beginning of the states losing the remainder of their sovereignty. It was not until 1944 that the corporate states lost all their power over the corporate United States with the Buck Act. With this Act, the states became, essentially, 14th Amendment Citizens as well. This completed the destruction of the corporate states having any power to protect against usurpation by the US Government. The corporate states went under the jurisdiction of Washington, DC Strangely enough, on October 28, 1977, HJR-192 was quietly repealed by public law 95-147. The joint resolution entitled “Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States” approved June 5, 1933 (31 USC 463), shall not apply to obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section. (but it is codified at 31 USC § 5118) The reason for the repeal of HJR-192 is somewhat obscure. After 44 years of unchallenged implementation, this public policy is clearly established by custom, usage and participation in the credit system by the American public. Those of us operating on the privilege of limited liability, via the public credit, are still bound. The adoption of the Uniform Commercial Code by all States in 1964 and a number of other like laws and Acts were incorporated into this nation. This made the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the Supreme Law of the Land. Courts Shift from Common Law to Equity and Admiralty Courts Under the Constitution, based on Common Law, the Republic of the Continental United States provides for legal cases: at Law, in Equity, and in Admiralty. (1) Law is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense. It is the will of the majority, the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces, to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all. Since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force—for the same reason—cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups. Law allows you to do anything you want to, as long as you don’t infringe upon the life, liberty or property of anyone else. Law does not compel performance. Today’s so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations, orders, precepts, etc.) are often erroneously perceived as law, but just because something is called a “law” does not necessarily make it a law. [There is a difference between “legal” and “lawful.” Anything the government does is legal, but it may not be lawful.] (2) Equity is the jurisdiction of compelled performance (for any contract you are a party to) and is based on what is fair in a particular situation. The term “equity” denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the intercourse of men with men. You have no rights other than what is specified in your contract. Equity has no criminal aspects to it. (3) Admiralty is compelled performance plus a criminal penalty, a civil contract with a criminal penalty. By 1938 the gradual merger procedurally between law and equity actions (ie, the same court has jurisdiction over legal, equitable, and admiralty matters) was recognized. The nation was bankrupt and was owned by its creditors (the international bankers) who now owned everything—the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the States and their legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the people. Everything was mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone from being sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments to discharge our debts with limited liability, instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin. The change in our system of law from public law to private commercial law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the Erie Railroad vs. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all US Supreme Court decisions were based upon public law—or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. Since 1938, all US Supreme Court decisions are based upon what is termed public policy. Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument’s Law, which is a branch of the international Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of the UNITED STATES. In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) which the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for education, highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the States of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United States (as distinguished from the Continental United States). The fifty States accepted the “benefits” offered by the Federal United States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between the Federal United States and each of the corporate States. The corporate States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the credit loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of federal grants, was predicated upon equitable paper. This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is what has altered our court system from one under the Common Law to a Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law. Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use a so-called “benefit” offered, or available, to them, from government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. See Howard Freeman here: http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm In 1976, Congress took away any semblance of law or justice left within our court system. All law today is now construed, constructed and made up by the judge as it happens before your very eyes. Common law has almost disappeared from the courts. They took away any control or authority we might have had over the court system. This has been very well hidden from all of us. Many of us going into court often wonder why and how the courts can simply override the laws we put into our paperwork. It’s very simple now that we know how they do it. They operate on the words `construe and construct.’ A simple word such as `in’ changed to `at’ as in `at law’ or `in law’ has a totally separate meaning. For example: If you’re in the river, you are wet, you can swim, etc., but if you’re at the river, you might enjoy a refreshing picnic, play baseball or run races. See the difference a simple word can make? And, the attorneys often change this word when they answer your motions – in addition to many others. It will pay you in dividends to read the answers of attorneys to your paperwork. Compare what they say the case law says to the actual case law itself. You’ll discover that they have actually changed the words therein. This is illegal, you might say. No, not, according to the US Code. You see, they can now construe and construct any law or statute to mean whatever they decide it means, for their benefit. You don’t know any of this. You think they are railroading you in a kangaroo court. No, they are `legal’ in what they do. They usually follow the law to the letter; Their law, private law, the law of contract, that you know nothing about. This law is called contract law. Uniform Commercial Code: Contract Acceptance and Honor If you don’t understand contract law or realize what law you are dealing with when you go into court, you will lose. Even if you have filed your UCC-1 and have captured your Title and your artificial entity, this makes no difference in the above courts. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why?</span> ¿Por qué?</span> They operate in total fiction, in the land of Oz. They can only recognize contracts. And you are a real sentient being. (Still with numerous adhesion contracts attached to you). Whatever you file in that court, whether it is your UCC-1 or Law from the Judicial and Original Jurisdiction side, that is real, Lawful, truth. They do not recognize truth of any sort. They only recognize fiction and contract law. So, when you go into any court, be aware that it is their law, that the judge or the prosecutor can `construe’ and `construct’ that law in any fashion they choose. It will always mean what they choose it to mean. So, are the courts bound by the Constitution? Law? Statutes? No, contracts only and the statutes used to enforce the contracts. When used in conjunction with one’s signature, a stamp stating “Without Prejudice UCC 1-207” is sufficient to indicate to the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals (called “courts”) that the signer of the document has reserved his Common Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case in any Common Law contract. Furthermore, pursuant to UCC 1-103, the statute being enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the remedy provided in this new system of law. He retains his former status in the Republic and fully enjoys his unalienable rights, guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while those about him “curse the darkness” of Commercial Law government, lacking the truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the Federal United States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its territorial venue. -Howard Freeman Summary of Historical Development of Modern Feudalism THE UNITED STATES as a corporation, created in England, came under the jurisdiction of England. This entitled England to create laws as England saw fit to do, establish those laws in THE UNITED STATES and everyone who at that time was a 14th Amendment Citizen were subject to obey those laws. This also placed the Congress of THE UNITED STATES above that portion of what we think is the constitution, not under the authority of the constitution. Copyrighted, remember? The only Bill of Rights left at this point in time is four Amendments — 13th, 14th 15th, and 16th. That is all the Courts are required to take cognizance of when you appear in their courts. The 1929 stock market crash and the Great Depression that followed placed the American people in desperation, homelessness, poverty and even starvation. The minds of the people were focused on survival. They were then in a condition to accept any handout given by the government, no matter what the cost to their freedoms. We were drawn in as 14th Amendment Citizens through the registration of our birth certificates. We were further enticed deeper into that system by volunteering for many other licenses and privileges given by the government. We were also made enemies of THE UNITED STATES. This act gave the UNITED STATES authority, under the laws of war and as a captured people, to force anything on us they choose to create. Then, in 1976, Congress removed any semblance of justice in our court system with Senate bill 94-201 and 94-381. From this point forward, the ‘officers of the court’ can construe and construct the laws to mean anything they chose them to mean. As 14th Amendment Citizens, we are not citizens of the America we have always thought. We are actually citizens of England, through the corporation of THE UNITED STATES. There is no law today except as fiction of copyrighted statutes, to be interpreted by ‘judges’ who construe and construct whatever they choose to have those statutes mean. We, as sovereigns irresponsibly recognized the Crown of England (IMF) as PRINCIPLE of America. In reality, the IMF was the Creditor of the UNITED STATES, a corporation, but NEVER you. The Creditor of the UNITED STATES designed invisible contracts to ensnare the sovereign people of America as subjects. The Creditor of the UNITED STATES implemented the invisible contracts through apparent ‘color of law’ and the sovereigns irresponsibly agreed. We, as Sovereigns, through the invisible contracts, and our irresponsibility to reject the Creditors (IMF) ideas, have voluntarily given our substance to the mythical creator of our situation. You’ll find that there is a common thread woven throughout our entire history and that thread is commerce, the merchant, the money-changer (banks), the law merchant, ie, the law of commerce, civil law and maritime law. This is not to say that commerce is bad. It does, however, say that commerce brings with it the laws of commerce. Wherever commerce goes it brings laws that can bind people into slavery. This can happen only if the people agree with it. Banks create “money” today out of thin air; then, they charge, we, the people, interest on their creation. This can happen only if the people agree with it. Thereafter, the merchants and the bankers create laws, through lawmakers whom they control, that protect commerce and bind the people to obey. This can happen only if the people agree with it. The only reason this occurs is that we do not handle our own affairs. Me and My Shadow: the Fictional STRAWMAN The elected and appointed administrators of government United States government have been filing certified copies of all our birth certificates in the United States Department of Commerce as registered securities. These securities, each of which carries an estimated $1,000,000 value, have been (and still are) circulated around the world as collateral for loans, entries on the asset side of ledgers, etc., just like any other security. There’s just one problem—we didn’t consciously authorize it. Now that you know, you can choose to let them use you for collateral and pay interest on the debt or you can take back your power and sovereignty. The United States is a District of Columbia corporation. In Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. 1785 we find “The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State” (NY re: Merriam 36 NE 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287). Since a corporation is a fictitious “person” (it cannot speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it cannot, by itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to “connect” the fictitious person, and the fictional world in which it exists, to the real world. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why is this important?</span> ¿Porque es esto importante?</span> LIVING people exist in a real world, not a fictional, virtual world. But government exists in a fictional world, and can only deal directly with other fictional or virtual persons, agencies, states, etc. In order for a fictional person to deal with real people there must be a connection, a liaison, a go-between. This can be something as simple as a contract. When both “persons”, the real and fictional, agree to the terms of a contract, there is a connection, intercourse, dealings, there is communication, an exchange. There is business. But there is another way for fictional government to deal with the real man and woman—through the use of a representative, a liaison, a go-between. Who is this go-between that connects fictional government to real men and women? It’s a government-created shadow, a fictional man or woman, a corporation with the same name as yours. This PERSON was created by using your birth certificate as the Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin (MCO) and the state in which you were born as the “port of entry.” This gave fictional UNITED STATES government a fictional PERSON with whom to deal directly. This PERSON is a STRAWMAN. STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin – A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety. This definition comes from Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1421. Following the definition of STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black’s we find the next word, STRAWMAN. STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction, one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose otherwise allowed. Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the term “STRAWMAN” as “A weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted; or a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction”. The STRAWMAN can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a nonentity. The STRAWMAN is a “shadow”, a go-between. For quite some time a rather large number of people in this country have known that a man or woman’s name, written in ALL CAPS, or last name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking this one step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no provisions for the abbreviation of people’s names, ie initials are not to be used. As an example, John Adam Smith is correct. ANYTHING else is not correct. Not Smith, John Adam or Smith, John A. or J. Smith or JA Smith or JOHN ADAM SMITH or SMITH, JOHN or any other variation. NOTHING, other than John Adam Smith identifies the real, living man. All other appellations identify either a deceased man or a fictitious man such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN. Over the years, government, through its “public” school system, has managed to pull the wool over our eyes and keep us all ignorant of some very important facts. Because all facets of the media have an ever increasing influence in our lives, and because media is controlled (with the issuance of licenses, etc.) by government and its agencies, we have slowly and systematically been led to believe that any form/appellation of our name is, in fact, still us as long as the spelling is correct. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>This is not true.</span> Esto no es verdad.</span> We were never told, with full and open disclosure, what our government officials were planning to do … and why. We were never told that government (the United States) was a corporation, a fictitious “person”. We were never told that government had quietly, almost secretly, created a shadow corporation, a STRAWMAN for each and every American … so that government could not only control the people, but also raise an almost unlimited amount of revenue; so it could continue, not just to exist, but to GROW. We were never told that when government deals with the STRAWMAN it is not dealing with real, living men and women. We were never told, openly and clearly with full disclosure of all the facts, that since June 5, 1933, we have been unable to pay our debts. We were never told that we had been pledged (and our children, and their children, and their children) as collateral, mere chattel, for the debt created by government officials who committed treason in doing so. We were never told that they quietly and cleverly changed the rules, even the game itself, and that the world we perceive as real is in fact fictional – and its all for their benefit. We were never told that the STRAWMAN—a fictional person, a creature of THE STATE—is subject to all the codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. decreed by government, but that WE, the real man and woman, are not. We were never told that we were being treated as property, as slaves, albeit comfortably for some, while living in the land of the free—and that we could, easily, walk away from the fraud. We never realized that we were being abused. By knowing the difference between our real self and our STRAWMAN and behaving accordingly, we regain our proper sovereignty over “legal fictions” and the ability to experience true freedom which is our birthright, for the enjoyment of the Divine in us all. There’s something else you should know: Everything, since June 1933, operates in COMMERCE. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why is this important?</span> ¿Porque es esto importante?</span> Commerce is based on agreement, on contract. Government has an implied agreement with the STRAWMAN which they created and the STRAWMAN is subject to government rule, as we illustrated above. But when we, the real flesh and blood man and woman, infer that they are trying to communicate with us and therefore step into their commercial “process” we become the “surety” for the fictional STRAWMAN. Reality and fiction are reversed. We then become liable for the debts, liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN, relinquishing our real (protected by the Constitution) character as we stand in for the fictional STRAWMAN. So that we can once again place the STRAWMAN in the fictional world and keep ourselves in the real world (with all our “shields” in place against the fictional government) we must send a non-negotiable (private) “Charge Back” and a non-negotiable “Bill of Exchange” to the United States Secretary of the Treasury, along with a copy of our birth certificate, the evidence, the Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin of the STRAWMAN. By doing this we discharge our portion of the public debt, releasing us, the real man or woman, from the debts, liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN. Those debts, liabilities and obligations exist in the fictional commercial world of “book entries” on computers and/or in paper ledgers. It is a world of “digits” and “notes”, not of money and substance. Property of the real man once again becomes tax exempt and free from levy. Sending the non-negotiable Charge Back and Bill of Exchange accesses our Treasury Direct Account (TDA). What is our TDA? Title 26 USC section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii), $1,000,000 limitation: “The aggregate amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall not exceed $1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return).” (editors note: we do not have a TDA… this is a pass thru, or setoff account) This $1,000,000 account is for the STRAWMAN, the fictional “person” with the name in all caps and/or last name first. It is there for the purpose of making book entries, to move figures, “digits” from one side of ledgers to the other. Figures, digits, the entries in ledgers must move from asset side to debit side and back again, or commerce dies. No movement, no commerce. (the $1,000,000 should actually be in the amount of unlimited). The fictional persona of corporate government can only function in a functional commercial world, one where there is no real money, only fictional funds … mere entries, figures, digits. Corporate, STATE courts only have jurisdiction over the STRAWMAN. A presentment from fictional government—whether traffic citation or criminal charges—is a negative, commercial “claim” against the STRAWMAN. This “claim” takes place in the commercial, fictional world of government. “Digits” move from one side of your STRAWMAN account to the other, or to a different account. This is today’s commerce. In the past we have addressed these “claims” by fighting them in court, with one “legal process” or another, and failed. We have played the futile, legalistic, charade—a very clever distraction—while the commerce game played on. We were playing checkers whereas the rules were MONOPOLY. But what if we refused to continue playing the charade, and played the commerce game instead? What if we learned how to control the flow and movement of entries, figures and digits, for our own benefit? <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Is that possible?</span> ¿Es eso posible?</span> And if so, how? How can the real man in the real world, function in the fictional world in which the commerce game exists? When in commerce do as commerce does – use the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC-1 Financing Statement is the one contract in the world that CANNOT be broken and it’s the foundation of the Accepted for Value process. The power of this document is awesome. Since the TDA (treasury account, not treasury direct account) exists for the STRAWMAN – who, until now, has been controlled by the government – WE can gain control and ownership of the STRAWMAN by first activating the TDA and then filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement. This does two things for us. First, by activating the TDA we gain limited control over the funds in the account. This allows us to also move entries, figures and digits … for OUR benefit. Secondly, by properly filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement we become the “holder in due course” of the STRAWMAN. A filed UCC-1 is public notice of a registered lien by a real human being who is the secured party, upon the STRAWMAN, the government-created, foreign non-registered corporation. With the STRAWMAN under our control, government has no access to the TDA and they also lose their go-between, their liaison, their connection to the real, living man and woman. No longer a subject, you become a free sovereign once again. You declare your independence! From now on, when presented with any “claim” or presentment from government, you will agree with it. This removes the “controversy.” And you “accept it for value.” By doing this you remove the negative claim against your account and become the “holder in due course” of the presentment. As holder in due course you can require the sworn testimony of the presenter of the “claim” under penalty of perjury and request the account be properly adjusted. You don’t have liability for your STRAWMAN. If you do commercial assignments, you have an asset called a Bill of Exchange which you can spend out. The birth certificate represents the body. The SSN represents the commercial account. Behind every birth certificate is a $1,000,000 (we know how to make this ANY size we need to now) bond which is pre-paid financing on any activity of the STRAWMAN. Some people have used their TDA to pay off their home or commercial mortgage, bank or student loans, tax liens, or credit card debt.. When you own your STRAWMAN and anyone else charges against HIM, then that is commercial trespassing. If anyone goes after your STRAWMAN and wins any monetary award against the fiction of your STRAWMAN, then you (the real person/ secured party) get the first $1,000,000 of that because you have the first lien. It’s all business, a commercial undertaking, and the basic procedure is not complicated. In fact, it’s fairly simple. We just have to remember a few things, like: this is not a “legal” procedure – we’re not playing People’s Court. This is commerce, and we play by the rules of commerce. We accept the “claim”, become the holder in due course, and challenge whether or not the presenter of the “claim” had/has the proper authority, the Order, to make the claim (debit our account) in the first place. When they cannot produce the Order (they never can, it was never issued) we request the account be properly adjusted (the charge or claim goes away). Always Accept for Value, become the holder-in-due-course, and decide not to prosecute yourself! Are you getting used to this power yet? If they don’t adjust the account a request is made for the bookkeeping records showing where the funds in question were assigned. This is done by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return for this claim. (we now know that this is where the 1099-OID comes in) Since the claim has been accepted for value and is pre-paid, and our TDA is exempt from levy, the request for the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return is valid because the information is necessary in determining who is delinquent and/or making claims on the account. If there is no record of the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return, we then request the individual tax estimates and individual tax returns to determine if there is delinquency. If we receive no favorable response to the above requests, we will then file a currency report on the amount claimed/ assessed against our account and begin the commercial process that will force them either to do what is required or lose everything they own! This is the power of contracts in commerce. A contract overrides the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and any other document other than another contract. No process of law—”color” of law under present codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.—can operate upon you; no agent and/or agency of government, including courts, can gain jurisdiction over you, without your consent! You do not exist within their fictional commercial venue. The Accepted for Value process gives you the ability to deal with “them,” through the use of your transmitting utility/go-between, the STRAWMAN, and to hold them accountable in their own commercial world for any action(s) they attempt to take against us. Without a proper Order (and we know they’re not in possession of such a document) they must leave us alone, or pay the consequences. In addition to your own freedom reclaimed, you will remove your collateral and participation from the frauds, manipulations, and extortion that have been perpetrated in your name. When enough people have reclaimed their birthright, we can also reclaim our constitutional republic that was intended to serve us in protecting our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

La verdad sobre su estado como un esclavo en AMERICA

La alucinación AMERICANA

THE AMERICAN HALLUCINATION I clipped this from an article that I was reading a little while ago – Interesting article! – I had to read this clip two or three times, but then it hit me – he is right, all this crap is pretend (or, fiction) anyway. The article was called “The American Hallucination…..” by, Stephen Ames, (in a mental institution – apparently for thinking out loud), and it was not really about ‘redemption’ – this part of the article was just an observation of the author. The fact that it was just an observation is what really jumped out at me! “An exceptional act that these pretended judges and lawyers are not laughing about is a process that is known as Redemption. Does this process work? You bet it does. The Redemption Process is entirely based on fictions. By engaging in this Process known as Redemption life is being breathed into the ultimate fictional code that binds their fictional system together. This fictional law is known as the Uniform Commercial Code. People pretend that they are a creditor instead of pretending that they are a debtor. This allows people to do anything they want and not be prosecuted for it and if one really understands the Uniform Commercial Code, one can purchase anything one wants without having to labor like the rest of the slaves. The act of acknowledging the Code brings the entire pretended government to life. When you pretend to be a creditor instead of a debtor the pretended judges and lawyers become your servants. You have to know exactly what you are doing or they will warehouse you. Th e Uniform Commercial Code is the rules of the Hallucination. That is why the Redemption Process is successful.” (Emphasis added) This was apparently written quite some time ago – the posting I found was dated July 4, 2001. To: IAHF List Subject: The American Hallucination: An Indictment of the American Mind From: “International Advocates for Health Freedom” jham@iahf.com Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 11:58:14 -0400 IAHF List: These essays by political prisoner Stephen Ames are serious food for thought. He is locked up in a Pennsylvania Mental Hospital, an enemy of the state, for steadfastly proclaiming these heretical ideas. They have broken him. They have fried his brain, and reduced him to a broken automoton. He LOVES Big Brother now, like a modern day Winston Smith straight out of George Orwell’s 1984. He is a modern day American Patriot, and he has MUCH to expose in his essays. The state of Pennsylvania is perhaps the most fascistic of the 50 states. If you speak out against the government there, you could easily find yourself committed to a mental hospital just like Stephen Ames was. Wake up, America. The scam against us began with the so called Founding Fathers, who were all traitors, they were all Masons, loyal to King George and to the New World Order, which we now find seriously amping up their campaign to enslave us and strip us of our few remaining liberties. The American Revolution was real in the minds of the people of this country, including to me in many ways, but there was a hidden component to what happened when this nation was “created” and its that HIDDEN component to things that Stephen Ames exposes thoroughly in his well written, heavily documented essays. Its not by some “accident” that we find that unfinished pyrimid with the All Seeing Eye of Horus on the back of our one dollar bills. This is DEEP, VERY DEEP. If you are from outside America, you might be perplexed how I could send out an email on our so called “Independence Day” titled “The American Hallucination: An Indictment of the American Mind” and still profess to be patriotic. The fact is that I oppose tyranny, and in some respects our nation has become a monster, a horrible tyrannical Nazi monster loose upon the face of the earth, and it is up to all of us to reign it in and expose it. Paradoxically, we still have an enviable degree of freedom here, even as our would be slave masters seek to strip it from us, and from all people world wide. A time will come when the American people will rise up against our corrupt government bearing arms, for the government is ignoring us, and our elected officials are urinating on their oaths of office. Stephen Ames is a true modern day American Patriot. Please read what he has to say and please forward his essays to more people, world wide. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Thank you.</span> Gracias.</span> http://www.apfn.org/apfn/apfncont.htm Subject: THE AMERICAN HALLUCINATION Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:06:18 -0400 From: “Nicole Terry” Dimenzions@paonline.com Here are some very shocking Essays that were written by Stephen Ames. I stumbled across them a while back. These Essays made me quite upset after reading them. The most shocking subjects in these essays has to be that Social Security numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF and what Stephen deduced from the bombing of the Murrah Building. He saw something in the bombing that I have never read or heard anyone talk about. When you read these Essays you will come to a complete understanding of how controlled we all are. Nicole Terry AN INDICTMENT OF THE AMERICAN MIND BY: Stephen Ames So how do most American’s resolve conflicts they face when authority figures command them to negate human life or human dignity? The most important and best known study on obedience to authority was carried out by Stanely Milgram at Yale University in the early 1960’s. His work can be found in the Journal of Abnormal and Social psychology, 67, 371-378 (1963) and in a book authored by him “Obedience to Authority” published by Harper and Row (1974). The most fascinating aspect of Milgram’s work was that the results he came up with surprised both himself and his colleagues. In fact his work almost entirely escaped one of the most common complaints leveled at psychological research, namely that the experimental findings merely confirm common sense. There was a wide variety of people of different ages and occupations involved in= the experiment. This is how the experiment worked. You are taken into a room and met by a 31 year old biology teacher, the experimenter. The other person in the room is a 47 year old accountant who is mild mannered and likable. The experimenter tells you that he is interested in learning about the effects of punishment on learning. It is decided by drawing lots that the accountant will be the learner and you will be the teacher. You go into a room where the learner is strapped into an “electric chair” and an electrode is strapped to his wrist. Electrode paste is applied to his wrist to avoid burns and blisters. You are told that the electrode is connected to a nearby shock generator. You go into another room, which has the shock generator unit in it. It has 30 lever switches, each labeled with a voltage between 15 and 450 volts. Groups of four switches of increasing voltage are labeled Slight Shock, moderate Shock, Strong Shock, very Strong Shock, Intense Shock, extreme Intensity Shock, and DANGER: Severe Shock. The final two levers are simply marked XXX. You are told to administer a shock to the learner each time he answers wrong and to move one level higher each time. As the learning tasks proceeds, the learner would make a number of mistakes and receive more intense shocks. After receiving shocks of 75, 90 and 105 volts, he would merely grunt. At 120 volts he would yell to the experimenter that the shocks were becoming painful. At 150 volts he would yell ‘Get me out of here ! I won’t be in this experiment anymore! I refuse to go on!” At 180 volts he yells “I can’t stand the pain”, and at 270 volts his response becomes a scream. Thereafter, there are screams of agony, and a vehement refusal to go on with the experiment or provide answers to questions. When the 300 volt shock is reached, he pounds on the wall. If you , the “teacher”, say at any point that you don’t want to continue the experiment, the experimenter calmly informs you that you must. What would you do in that situation? What do you think other people would do? Stanely Milgram put these two questions to psychiatrists, students and middle class adults. When predicting their own behavior, absolutely everyone predicted that they would defy the experimenter and refuse to continue with the experiment. People tend to have a high opinion of themselves. For example, psychiatrists at a leading medical school predicted that only 3.73 percent of subjects would obey the experimenter at 300 volts and that only 1 in a 1000 would go to the 450 volt <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>stage.</span> escenario.</span> Most people unfamiliar with the actual results would predict that only a psychopath or a sadist would be likely to keep on administering intense electric shocks to an obviously distraught, tortured and unwilling subject. But, in fact, Milgram found that 62 percent of the people exposed to the conditions just described continued to obey the experimenter to the lethal 450 volt level! In fact 500 times as many individuals prepared to administer the maximum shock as predicted by a group of psychiatrists! The learner was in collusion with the experimenter and did not actually receive any electric shocks at all. The study was rigged so that the mild mannered accountant was always the learner and the subject would always be the teacher. Milgram also argued that what critics of his work really objected to was the terrible picture it drew of human nature rather than the deception or methodology involved. Would the Milgram study have been the subject of public outrage if all the participants had disobeyed the experimenter at the first sign of discomfort from the learner? The evidence suggests not. Several people were given a description of the Milgram study; some were told that most of the participants were obedient to the experimenter, and the rest that most of them were disobedient. They rated the experiment as more harmful and as providing a worse experience when there was a large measure of obedience. In the Milgram study, the experimenter represented an authority figure. His authority was enhanced by the special coat he wore, by his association with Yale university, by his aura of expertise in human behavior. On the other hand the “learner” in the Milgram study did everything he could to persuade the subject to stop administering shocks. He screamed, he begged the subject to stop and in some cases he even said he had a heart condition. The participant was unable to satisfy both the experimenter and the victim of torture. Most people chose to side with the experimenter. The experimenter was perceived as a authority figure so obedience, even commands to commit torture were considered the norm. After the experiment the subjects were debriefed and it was explained to them that the were not really electrocuting the learner. When a human being was replaced with a puppy in a Milgram type experiment in which actual electricity was used because you can’t make a puppy yelp and howl without pain. Only 54 per cent of male participants would administer a genuine electric shock to the puppy. But 100 per cent of the female participants were prepared to give the most severe shock to the howling and yelping puppy. This I find very troubling. A psychiatrist by the name of RD Laing along with numerous other psychiatrists claim that mental illness is a myth. They argue, anyone allegedly suffering from mental illness is simply behaving in ways which deviate from those which are expected. I would like to point out that anyone who would not inflict 450 volts into another human being on command is outside of the normal in American Society Largely America (62 per cent) is made up of sadists, psychopaths and potential murderers and considers behavior outside of their own as abnormal. They label those who are unlike them as mentally ill or criminals. For example, most American’s tend to become quite upset if you do not want to pay the Internal Revenue Service. First, the Internal Revenue Service is not a United States Government Agency, it is an Agency of the International Monetary Fund; second, there is no law in the United States Code requiring the vast majority of the American people to pay or file anything with the Internal Revenue Service; third, a 1040 form is for a payment of a debt to Great Britain; fourth, not one electron collected by the Internal Revenue Service goes to the United States government (The United States has not had a Treasury since 1921); fifth, the Internal Revenue Service does not collect money, It collects electrons. It has to collect these electrons or pretended hyperinflation would set in. The electrons collected by the Internal Revenue Service are not placed into an account, the electrons are simply deleted. People do not seem to be able to grasp that a loan is nothing more than computer key strokes. The only reason that there is interest on a pretended loan is because people might figure out what is going on, because in their minds banks make money by charging interest on loans. The reality of the situation is banks do not make loans. Banks put electrons into circulation. People make payments in electrons on what they think is the principle plus the interest of a loan. If you want to pay the Internal revenue Service or a Bank just send them a nine volt battery and tell them to keep the change. Whether they collect electrons or not is debatable. It depends on whether or not you agree with Max Planck, because waves are particles and particles are waves. (We are told that there is not a unified theory and that physicists are searching for it, that is not true.Your entire existence, commerce, religion, reality and very thoughts can be summed up in this equation. This equation is not a theory but, a proof. The proof is: 1.602 x 10-19 C =E0 E=A5 FT =3D h /E=A5m h/ E=A5m [coupled with] Ft =3D I I =E0 D3 D3 =3D R (R being “Reality”) eR =3D 0 Zero is the absence of quantity and a linguistic element. To make matters even worse , when you don’t pay the Internal Revenue Service or a bank, people consider you a criminal or a dead beat. You are then prosecuted by someone who is a subordinate (Pretended US Attorney paid by the IMF in electrons) of the Alien Property Custodian (Pretended Attorney General of the United States, INTERPOL agent, paid in electrons by IMF). I almost forgot: You are the Alien. Read the list below: 1. The IRS is not a US Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. 2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. 3. The US Has not had a Treasury since 1921. 4. The US Treasury is now the IMF. 5. The Attorney General of the US is not employed by the US But is an Agent of INTERPOL which is head quartered in Lyons, France. 6. The United States does not have any employees. 7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. 8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. 9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. 10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. 11. You are an “Institutional Unit” in which your body and labor are pledged to the UN through the IMF. 12. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System. 13. Your Social Security number is your slave number. Just about everyone in the World has a Social Security number from the UN through the IMF. 14. The UN is a One World Super Government. 15. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations. 16. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that “New York City was the capital of the World” and he was correct. 17. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. 18. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. 19. You own no property, slaves can’t own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. 20. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. GUESS WHO AND WHAT OWNS YOU AND THE UNITED NATIONS ? As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives, imagined Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal Judges are not paid by the United States Government. Actually the United States Government does not have any employees They are paid by the International Monetary Fund in electrons. You see there is no such thing as the United States Government. In reality there are no Governments. There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the Federal Reserve Inc., and the United States Inc., which in fact are private corporations. The United States Inc., is just a slave management company. Guess what that makes you? If you said property, you are correct! You are Human Capital. The shares that were issued for the Federal Reserve when it was created back in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain. To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 USC 903, 12 USC 95, 18 USCA 914, 22 USC 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public Law 89-719, Public Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151 Public Law 103-465, House Report 103-826 TDO 150-10, TDO 92, 41 Stat. Chap 214 pg. 654, Emergency Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of Agreement 60 Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2), United Nations Secretariat Revised System of National Accounting, Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE USDCDI, Cromelin v. United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United States, 493 F.Supp 673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, United States v. LePatourel, 571 F2d 405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30, Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493. 42 Pa.CSA 502. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs. When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatte r into a thousand pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has been nothing but a hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that there is NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are fictions accepted by you because you have been lied to and poisoned your entire life.. What would you do without an external authority commanding you what to do and what not to do? Would you be lost? Did you ever think that maybe you would find yourself? I am not afraid to acknowledge that I am an incomplete ‘Being in motion’ searching for my reason for existing in this Petry dish commonly called Earth. The evidence in my possession cannot be rebutted. Think twice before labeling me. One can quickly become diagnosed mentally ill for stating the facts listed above. Most American’s want people who research and discover things such as those listed above to be locked away or murdered because, it holds a mirror up to them and shows the evil that actually lurks in their hearts. That is exactly what has happened to me. Don’t you want my death? The people here in Pennsylvania love death. They also want Mumia Jamal, Lisa Lambert and a host of other innocent people murdered. When federal Judge Danzell released Lisa Lambert on a Habeas Corpus the people here in Central Pennsylvania wanted Judge Danzell impeached. They want Lisa Lambert dead. Judge Danzell said that Lisa Lambert’s case was the worst case that he has ever seen in the English speaking world. Like Jim Morrison said in the film “The Doors”, “Hatred is a very under estimated emotion.” I will be dead soon enough. I am living in a “madhouse” now. I have been living here for a couple of months. I am on a steady diet of Lithium Haldol etc., which sooner or later kills you. It’s not that I really want to live in this world but, the death caused by the mixture of Lithium and Haldol is a terrible form of torture. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>I don’t like it here.</span> No me gusta aquí.</span> I don’t have anyone to talk to. I don’t even have my own room. I feel so sorry for the people that live here. In my opinion not one of them is mentally ill. They all seem to be suffering from living through terrible childhood’s and never having anyone in their lives who cared about or loved them. I am glad that they did allow me to bring my computer with me. So I just sit here on the floor and type away. This essay will probably never be read by anyone. It is more of a diary than an essay. I am writing it for myself and my children. I write everyday and save it on disk so that when my children grow up, they can read for themselves why their dad was locked away in a home for the Insane. I never thought that they would go this far and do this to me and rob my children of their father. But, I do the unspeakable — I commit thought crimes. THE END Labels for you and me By: Stephen Ames The importance of labels was memorably expressed by RDLaing. He claimed that if someone labeled a scientist said “All men are machines”, he might receive a Nobel prize. In contrast, if someone labeled a schizophrenic said “I am a machine”, he would promptly be locked away. An attempt to evaluate the relative merits of these two diametrically opposed positions, was made by David Rosenhan of Stanford University. David Rosenhan was extremely interested in the various approaches that have been adopted towards the treatment of psychiatric disorders. He wondered, is it really as simple to distinguish between normality and abnormality as is implied by the medical model? Finally he came up with a way of trying to determine how well psychiatrist are able to distinguish between the normal and the abnormal, or between the sane and insane. What would happen if a number of entirely sane people attempted to gain admission to a mental hospital by pretending to have one of the symptoms of insanity? Would they be classified insane ? If they were admitted, would the staff realize that a mistake had been made? The answers to these and other questions were obtained in a study in which eight normal people, five men and three women, attempted to gain admission to twelve different psychiatric hospitals. The twelve psychiatric hospitals were located in five different states on the East and West coasts. Each of the eight participants phoned the hospital asking for an appointment. Upon arrival at the admissions office, each of them complained of hearing voices (these voices were often unclear, but appeared to be saying ’empty’, ‘hollow’, and ‘thud’. All were judged to be insane, and all were admitted to the hospital, on the basis of their symptom. One was diagnosed as manic-depressive psychosis, the others as schizophrenic. But as soon as they had been admitted the participants stopped simulating signs of abnormality, although several had a brief period of nervousness and anxiety because they felt they would immediately be exposed as frauds. While in the hospital, the participants indicated that they felt well and were no longer troubled by ‘voices’. In general, they behaved in a friendly and cooperative way. The only strange activity they engaged in was they spent time writing down their observations about the ward they were in. To begin with, these notes were written in secret, but it became clear that the staff did not notice, so the note-taking was done quit e openly. This, in my humble opinion, was accomplished because most people who work on a psychiatric ward (This is from personal experience) are some of the lowest functioning people in society. Their main concern is control of your thoughts and emotions. They seem to enjoy overpowering you to the point of the destruction of your mental faculties. What they can not accomplish with torture and punishment, they accomplish through pharmaceuticals. If you resist the taking of the pharmaceuticals, you will be held down and be given them by either injection or enema. The structure of the various hospitals was such that those of the greatest professional status had the least to do with their patients. The average daily contact of the participants was about 6 minutes. The actual length of hospitalization ranged from 7 to 52 days. The fact that all the participants were released within a few weeks would make you think that the psychiatric staff discovered that they had been sane all the time, but no. All of the participants were discharged with a diagnosis of ‘schizophrenia in remission.’ Quite a number of the real patients did become suspicious about the participants. The first three participants were placed in wards with a total of 118 patients, 35 of the patients voiced their doubts that the participants were mentally ill. They said things like ‘You’re a journalist, or a professor. You’re checking up on the hospital.’ These findings suggest that the distinction between the sane and insane is so blurred that psychiatrists constantly diagnose the sane for the insane. It is ironic that over 30 percent of the real patients knew that the participants were sane. As a matter of fact the participants, after insisting that they were ill to the real bona-fide patients, the real patients still didn’t buy it and insisted that the participants were sane. Rosenhan wondered whether he could show the opposite effect, the insane being sane. He chose as his testing ground a research and teaching hospital. The staff there had heard about the previous experiment and informed Rosenhan that they would not be fooled. The first thing Rosenhan did was inform the hospital staff at this hospital that he was going to send in one or more pseudo-patients and have them attempt to gain admission into the psychiatric ward during the following three months. Each member of the staff was asked to observe all patients who presented themselves for admission or in the ward and say whether they thought they were his pseudo-patients or genuine patients. Judgments were made on a total of 193 patients admitted for psychiatric treatment. Forty-one genuine patients were judged to be his pseudo-patients by at least one member of the staff. Nineteen patients were suspected of being frauds by one of the psychiatrists and another member of the staff. But the fact is, none of Rosenhan’s pseudo-patients sought admittance during this time. The people that were judged to be impostors were in fact real patients. The staff did not know the difference. This proves that mental hospital staff do know that they are admitting people, diagnosing them mentally ill, prescribing them dangerous pharmaceuticals, even forcing them to ingest the pharmaceuticals when they know quite well that the people are sane. Rosenhan’s conclusion was: ‘It’s clear that we cannot distinguish the sane from the insane in psychiatric hospitals’. One of the other points made by Rosenhan concerned the degrading conditions experienced by his pseudo-patients during their stays in the Psychiatric Wards. Rosenhan himself saw a patient beaten for walking up to one of the staff members and saying ‘I like you’. On numerous occasions, when the pseudo-patients approached staff members with polite requests for information, the staff simply ignored the request over 80 percent of the time and did not answer. When a question was presented to a psychiatrist it went unanswered and ignored over 70 percent of the time. That is how people are treated in the psychiatric wards at the hospitals that I have been admitted to also. Then if you ask more than once you are then threatened. Now think about this. How many people receive chemotherapy for cancer when the fact is they don’t have cancer at all. What about heart disease ? How many people are prescribed dangerous pharmaceuticals for heart disease that do not have heart disease. Last year over 170,000 people’s deaths were caused by prescription drugs. Yet the American people line up for them. About 3,500 deaths were caused by illicit drugs such as crack, meth, heroin etc and zero deaths from marijuana. Yet you will go to prison if you are caught possessing one of these drugs and you will go to prison for a very long time if you are caught selling one of these drugs. The bottom line is that the drug dealer on the corner is responsible for far less deaths than medical doctors. The difference is that the drug dealer on the corner does not have a license to KILL like the MD! These are prime examples of the Cognitive Dissonance of the common American mind. THE END The Thoughtless Mind BY: Stephen Ames The bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City is one of the most sensational experiments ever conducted on the American people. Everyone thinks there is a Government cover-up. The truth of the matter is there is no Government cover-up. The Government wants you to think that there is a cover-up. On the first day of the bombing when they kept reporting that there were more bombs in the building when actually there weren’t. They want you to think that there were more bombs in the building. Then in a few hours they changed their story after heavily reporting the existence of more bombs. You see the reason they committed such a tragic event was to keep you glued to the television. The bombing was committed to see how malleable the minds of the American people are. They needed something sensational to keep you tuned in. The bombing’s only purpose was to see if the people would have a complete lack of memory not just day to day but hour to hour. The bombing was not about passing laws or attacking the patriot or militia movement. It was about time factors and the malleability of facts after they are presented over and over. They actually killed more than one bird with this stone. They then proceeded to get people to say that there was a cover-up happening. That is what they want you to think. If they can’t convince you that there is a cover-up, then it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt just how non-thinking the American people are. This was by far one of the most high risk maneuvers ever by the Government. But, they needed to know. The results are astounding, most people are convinced that Timothy McVeigh in a Ryder truck did it. Other people think that the Government did it and that they screwed up and are trying to cover it up. The truth is Timothy Mcveigh didn’t do it, the Government did it and the Government is NOT trying to cover it up. Actually everything went as planned and is still going that way. There are numerous books and tapes about the supposed cover-up. People who are producing these tapes and books don’t know it, but they are doing the leg work. The American people do not understand psychology and the experimentation that is performed on their minds on a daily basis. I would venture to say excluding lawyers and their kind, that maybe one in a hundred thousand understand what the bombing of the Murrah Building was for. [[See APFN web page: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_coverup.htm ]] A great example of symbolism is their Gold Fringed Flag. Which according to various pretend Army regulations and executive order signifies when flown in a courtroom, that the court is a Military court. I know they laugh when someone argues with a pretended judge that his court is a Military court. The person does not seem to realize that he has just acknowledged that he is insane because he just called the room in which he is standing a courtroom. When in fact there is no such thing. [[See APFN web page: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm ]] An exceptional act that these pretended judges and lawyers are not laughing about is a process that is known as Redemption. Does this process work? You bet it does. The Redemption Process is entirely based on fictions. By engaging in this Process known as Redemption life is being breathed into the ultimate fictional code that binds their fictional system together. This fictional law is known as the Uniform Commercial Code. People pretend that they are a creditor instead of pretending that they are a debtor. This allows people to do anything they want and not be prosecuted for it and if one really understands the Uniform Commercial Code, one can purchase anything one wants without having to labor like the rest of the slaves. The act of acknowledging the Code brings the entire pretended government to life. When you pretend to be a creditor instead of a debtor the pretended judges and lawyers become your servants. You have to know exactly what you are doing or they will warehouse you. The Uniform Commercial Code is the rules of the Hallucination. That is why the Redemption Process is successful. The idea and concept that in order for me to trade goods and services with someone on the other side of an imaginary line, I must pay a pretended tax with pretended money (a few electrons) known as a tariff. Tariffs were created for one reason and one reason only. That reason is so you would think that there is a such thing as a Country. Countries are needed to keep people divided so that wars can be manufactured. The wars also serve the purpose of making you think that there is such a thing as a Country. By keeping the people divided it becomes necessary in the minds of the people to have a Government to protect them from the bad Countries. Of course what you think is a bad Country is the good Country in the eyes of the people who live there and your Country is the bad Country. Much of the division is based on religion. People will readily commit acts of genocide in the name of their religion. Marriage is a really strange concept. You purchase a license from a pretended government with electrons. Then you enter into a building that has a large phallus on top of it. Then you stand in front of an agent from the International Monetary Fund and take a vow that you will have sex with the same person for the rest of your life which of course you know isn’t true. Not only do you enter into a contract with the other person, but the pretended government that you purchased the License from is also a party to it. Actually it is the controlling party. It is also an alter-ego of the International Monetary Fund. I have this all documented. I almost forgot: most of the buildings that people get married in, also fly the Gold Fringed Flag. Voting is total lunacy. You vote for pretended Senators, Representatives and a President who are your sworn enemies. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Don’t believe it?</span> ¿No lo crees?</span> In march of 1933 the “Trading with The Enemy Act” was amended declaring those who call themselves “citizens of the United States” the enemy. That is how Frank captured the gold, by executive order from the American people. You are literally the enemy of the Fictional US Government. America is not in a moral crisis. America is in an Intelligence crisis. Over 50 percent of American’s have an IQ between 90 and 110. This allows them to eat, sleep, labor and breed but not much more. It is an impossibility for most American’s to understand even the simplest of abstract concepts or to follow the simplest of instructions. Logic, analytical and quantum reasoning are completely out of the question. Most American’s are functionally illiterate. THIS IS NOT THEIR FAULT! It is because of the food supply being deficient in nutrition. American’s lack of intelligence is also caused by vaccines, pharmaceuticals, fluorides, detergents, industrial cleaners commonly called shampoo etc. Americans have been poisoned. Less than 0.5 percent of American’s have an IQ of 140 or over. Most of these people rule over the others. Take lawyers for example. You just don’t decide to be a lawyer. After four years of schooling you have to take the LSAT. The LSAT is a test based mostly on analytical reasoning. The LSAT plays a major role in what Magic Law School one may be accepted into. Not all Magic Law School’s are created equal. Yale University only accepts 3 percent of the applicants. Now a buffoon would not even apply to such a prestigious School so, we are talking the best of the best and out of them only three percent are accepted. So after four years of schooling in a pre law program you have to attend Magic Law School for three years in order to become a lawyer. Even after all of that you still must pass the BAR exam. To be a ‘Magic Law Man’ (Lawyer) it takes a lot of study, discipline and intelligence. I don’t like lawyers but, I do like watching them work their magic. I really enjoy reading their magic papers such as motions and briefs. To me, watching a lawyer at work is by far the most enjoyable activity one can engage in. Even after all of the horrible things that lawyers have done to me, I still enjoy them. All lawyers lie. They have to in order to keep the people hallucinating. Lawyers will ever tell the truth. No one would believe them anyway. They want your mind. They even are confident enough to report it in the Congressional Record. For example: “We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.” Dr. Jose MR Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School, Congressional Record, No 26, vol. 118 February 24, 1974. People have to come to grips with the fact that enlightenment is the casting off the bonds of concept (ignorance) so that one may directly perceive the inexpressible nature of undifferentiated reality. For some reason that I do not understand, people do not look at undifferentiated reality the same as an enlightened being. Words only represent (re-present) something else. Words are not real things. In an illusory reality everything is a symbol. The reality of symbols is illusory. One must understand that governments are brought into your mind through symbols such as flags, codes, constitutions and statutes which are the will of your Master being imposed on you. Undifferentiated reality can not be expressed. Symbols cannot be used to describe it. Enlightenment is a state of being and it is not describable. People seem to want to make the description of the state of being, the state itself. A state of being is an experience. A description of a state of being is a symbol. Symbols and experiences are not governed by the same rules. Max Born wrote: The ultimate origin of the difficulty lies in the fact (or philosophical principle) that we are compelled to use words of common language when we wish to describe a phenomenon, not by logical or mathematical analysis, but by a picture appealing to the imagination. Common language has grown by everyday experience and can never surpass these limits. THE END Crime and Commerce By Stephen Ames Let us examine just what a crime is. Crime. A positive or negative act in violation of penal law; an offense against the State or United States. Remember that the States and United States are fictions so, how can you damage a fiction. What about a Tort? Tort. ( from Lat. torquere, to twist, tortus, twisted, wrestled aside). A private or civil wrong or injury, including action for bad faith breach of contract, for which the court will provide a remedy in the form of an action for damages. K Mart Corp. v. Ponsock, 103 Nev. 39, 732 P2d 1364, 1368. A legal wrong committed upon the person or property independent of contract. It may be either (1) a direct invasion of some legal right of the individual; (2) the infraction of some public duty by which special damage accrues to the individual: (3) the violation of some private obligation by which like damage accrues to the individual. Notice that a crime is an act against the State, but a tort is against an individual. So if you murder someone how is that a crime against the State? Please note that when you are charged with an offense, you are charged with violating a code or statute, not for violating the individual. The reason this is being done is because the State claims to own you, so if you kill someone it is the State that has been damaged. A tort is either mala in se or a breech of contract that causes a damage. There must be intent, but to commit a crime against the State there does not need to be intent. Mala prohibita. Prohibited wrongs or offenses; acts which are made offenses by positive laws, and prohibited as such. Acts or omissions which are made criminal by statute but which, of themselves, are not criminal. Generally, no criminal intent or mens rea is required and the mere accomplishment of the act or omission is sufficient for criminal liability. Term is used in contrast to mala in se which are acts which are wrong in themselves such as robbery. When you don’t file a 1040, that is an omission. Statute. A formal written enactment of a legislative body, whether federal, state, city, or county. An act of the legislature declaring, commanding, or prohibiting something; a particular law enacted and established by the will of the legislative department of government; the written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms necessary to constitute it the law of the state. Such may be public or private, declaratory, mandatory, directory, or enabling in nature. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Will.</span> Será.</span> Wish; desire; pleasure; inclination; <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>choice;</span> elección;</span> the faculty of conscious, and especially of deliberate, action. When a person expresses his “will” that a particular disposition be made of his property, his words are words of command, and the word “will” as so used is mandatory, comprehensive, and dispositive in nature. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Will.</span> Será.</span> An Instrument by which a person makes a disposition of his real and personal property, to take effect after his death, and which by its own nature is ambulatory and revocable during his lifetime. In re Brown’s Estate, Tex Civ. App., 507 SW 2d 801, 803. Instrument. Anything reduced to writing, a document of a formal or solemn character, a writing given as a means of affording evidence. A document or writing which gives formal expression to a legal act or agreement, for the purpose of creating, securing, modifying, or terminating a right. A writing executed and delivered as the evidence of an act or agreement. Moore v. Diamond Dry Goods Co., 47 Ariz 128, 54 P2d 553, 554. Do you understand the Two different ways they use the word “will.” What they do is reduce their “will” to writing and then enforce it at the point of a gun. This writing is also called a “Will.” Will, Statute, Instrument, and Code are synonymous. Do you understand where this going? “Will” is the disposition of property by someone’s command. A Statute is the Written Will of a Legislature. It used to be stated as “will and testament” Do you understand that when a Legislature passes an act they are creating or modifying a will. You are considered property of the State. Are you getting the picture? A code or statute is a “Will.” The Codes and Statutes of every State are Wills. (Note. When you are charged and warehoused in a jail it is because you went against the “Will” of your “Master.” It is not because you harmed another Being. –Nicole) Does not a 1040 form have a label? Label. Anything appended to a larger writing, as a codicil. In English law, a copy of a writ in the Exchequer. Exchequer. That department of the English government which has charge of the collection of the national revenue; the treasury department. Codicil. A supplement or addition to a will; it may explain, modify, add to, subtract from, qualify, alter, restrain or revoke provisions in existing will. Such does not purport to dispose of entire estate or to contain the entire will of testator, nor does it ordinarily expressly or by necessary implication revoke in toto a prior will. In re Crooke Estate, 388 Pa. 125, 130 A.2d 185, 187. Do you understand why people are forced to file a 1040 ? Because King George was the Prince Elector and Arch Treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire and of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA.[[ See APFN web page: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/colony.htm ]] The Constitution is the “Will.” Why do you think in the preamble to the Constitution it says “to ourselves and our Posterity?” Just read Article six section one. Remember the loans, IRS Publication 6209 (1040 for UK), the First Bank of the United States and numerous debt collection acts. Do you understand why in 26 USC there is no law requiring you to file? It is the Constitution that requires you to file, Article six section one! Do the IRS agents know this? Look at all of the Acts (Supplements to the Will) that have been passed to collect your labor, the symbols (electrons) that represent your labor. Now do you understand why the Constitution was never put to the people for a vote? It is because they were the property (citizens, persons, etc.) mentioned in the Will (Constitution). Now do you see why the Constitution was drafted in secret? Do you understand that when you pay with your labor you are adding electrons to the Estate and when you get a refund (electrons) you are subtracting from the Estate? Do you understand the importance of Codicil and Label? They don’t even have to connect the machine to our udders, we are self-milking slaves. The words charge and discharge are used in the imaginary laws of commerce because we are forced through our ignorance to use electrons as a medium of exchange. Don’t you ever wonder why you are asked by a cashier if you would like to charge it? The slip that the cashier hands you is the symbol of the electrons that have just entered the Circuit. Why do you think when you are dragged into one of their ‘courts’ they tell you that you have been ‘charged’? What do you think a ‘Transmitting Utility’ in Article nine of the Uniform Commercial Code is? So guess what the Transmitter is? Guess what is being broadcast, charged and discharged? People do not see the wave only the symbol of the wave. They do not know that the wave even exists. Why do you think that they pass bills? A bill is a charge for goods or services. Then you have the ‘Bill of Rights’. A ‘Right’ is one mans ability with the assistance of the state to control others (Blacks Law Dict.). That is why you must pay a filing fee when you file a suit against someone. You are being charged to use the State to force other people to be jurors, witnesses etc. Jurors are people who are being controlled by the State on your behalf. This is just a sampling of what has been done to us because of our greed, laziness, contempt for our fellow man, having the nerve to pretend to make laws and wanting something for nothing. We are having Electronic Warfare perpetrated on us. Our very physical bodies work upon electricity. Our thoughts are electricity. The thoughts that are placed into our minds are placed there through the use of electricity. The thoughts that you think are your own are not. You have to become aware. Please make an attempt to analyze the program that has been placed in you. You have to understand that the person who is in ‘charge’ is the one who controls thought by way of controlling the electricity in your brain. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Think about it.</span> Piénsalo.</span> If you had a plumber to your home and he tracked mud all over your carpet you would phone the company who employed him and ask to speak to the person in charge. The person in charge is the one who controls the electric current in the plumbers brain. Now if the plumber can not be controlled, he will be ‘fired’ or in other words discharged. What do people do when they are upset, they write to a legislator, one of their Masters? Legislatures were created for one purpose, to make you the property and to manage the electrical current in your brain. If a group of people can command you to act or not to act and take your labor, what are you? If they have the power to declare that an act that is not criminal, is a criminal act, what are they? You are a slave and they are your master. The thought that legislators, judges etc are in ‘charge’ has been willfully and deliberately placed in your brain so that you will be their slaves. E = I x R A bank is a capacitor in which the electrons flow to from ground. A check or money order etc. are the symbol which represents the electrons. (See definition of money in UCC) A loan is actually the procedure that is done to cause electrons to enter into the circuit. The check that you receive from the bank is the symbol of the electrons that have been put into a capacitor (account) in your name. This is accomplished by a few key strokes on a computer key board. The charge (electrons) are transferred from account to account (capacitor to capacitor) when a good or service is transmitted. This is done either by wire or satellite. (See Electronic Fund Transfer Blacks Law Dict. 6th Ed.) Remember an electron is both a wave and a particle. The system must never be allowed to become balanced. There has to always be a debt (something owed) in order for the electrons to flow. If electrons were not removed from the circuit the capacitors would all become equally charged and all commerce would cease. If the capacitors were all equal and the circuit was balanced how could one capacitor discharge into another. The Internal Revenue Service withdraws electrons from the Circuit by way of what is called an ‘Income Tax’. Income is the Electrons that have flowed into the circuit. There are other ways that remove electrons but this is the most noticeable. There has to be a load on the system in order for the electrons to flow. This must be done in order to allow commerce to flow. A debt can never be paid. A debt can only be discharged. The Circuit can be controlled by changing the Force, Current, or Resistance. Your labor is actually dissipated. The harder the people labor the more electrons they remove from the Circuit. There becomes too many electrons in the Circuit for the amount of goods and services consumed. So ‘Taxes’ must be raised or, in other words, the load must be increased. When they tell you that the economy is expanding it means that the Circuit is getting larger. Notice that when they tell you the economy is expand ing most people are working harder and their standard of living is dropping. Now, what do the electrons symbolize? People exist by symbols. Everything in this fictional world symbolizes something else. Those who refuse to bow to the IRS are in actuality keeping those who do alive. Those who bow to the IRS are destroying themselves. If we do not send electrons to the Banks and the IRS, this ultimate system of control will come crashing to the GROUND. In the present situation the peoples standard of living can only go down. Both parents now must labor in order to survive. Any variable in the system can modify it. One who is skilled in the art of controlling the Circuit is called an Economist. It is impossible for the mass of people to be paranoid. Paranoia is defined as a heightened sense of awareness. People are not even at the level of being aware, let alone paranoid. They (the mass of people) have their voltage (thoughts) supplied to them. How can you be aware when in your entire life you have never had a thought? THE END The Ultimate Delusion By: Stephen Ames Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended US Social Security, as follows: SI 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. [[ See APFN Web Pages: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/knighthood.htm ; http://www.apfn.org/apfn/queen.htm ]] At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows: “This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997.” Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law. Remember, King George was the “Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America.” See: Treaty of Peace (1783) 8 US Statutes at Large 80.. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA ..’ What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 USC 3002 (15) The United States is not a land mass, it is a corporation. Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * US 8 Statutes at Large 80. On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. King George funded both sides of the Revolutionary War. Now the Articles of Confederation which were declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12: “All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.” The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt owed to King George. Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, the conquest was not yet complete. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so called founding fathers were going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt. On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another’s debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote [[See APFN web page http://www.apfn.org/apfn/money.htm ]] On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 US Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don’t believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject. What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person. “Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person.” 9 F. Supp 272 “Word “person” does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176. There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction. For an indepth look into the nature of these corporations and to see how you also have been declared a fictional entity. See: AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS. VOL.XIII By James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) from La Salle University. This book explains in detail the nature and purpose of these corporations, you will be stunned at what you read. Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution. Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it states; “All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Ado ption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.” Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it. The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol.The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia’s duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>I’ll tell you how.</span> Te diré cómo.</span> The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the founding fathers, their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>It always has been.</span> Siempre lo ha sido.</span> How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can’t. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don’t believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states ” But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it.” Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) which states that it is the militia’s job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States…. the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is their duty to collect our substance. As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King’s commerce and make us slaves. If one goes to 8 US statutes at large 116-132 you will find “The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation”. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King’s Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was, he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King wanted them here. Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems, but they too are for the most part also slaves. Jewish Law does however govern the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit: “Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment’s of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactment’s and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher.” We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as (“Civil law and procedure”). Now turn to the “The Shetars Effect on English Law” — A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in “The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200.” It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code which is private international law. The written credit agreement — the Jewish shetar is a lien on all of the property in the world. The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great Britain and that the Jews are in charge of the Baking system. We are living under the Babylonian Talmud. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the various religions ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist. Private International Law, which is commercial law, only deals with fictions, known as persons. A person is a fictional entity at law, not a living being. See UCC 1-201. Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I’m sorry people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below. “But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it.” Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520 You have to understand that Great Britain,(Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why?</span> ¿Por qué?</span> Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Why?</span> ¿Por qué?</span> Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of examples: “The primary control and custody of infants is with the government” Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62 “Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state.” Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 NE 146. “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called ‘ownership” is only by virtue of Government, ie law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor. “The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under government.” Wynehamer v. The People. 13 NY Rep.378, 481 Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government. [[ See APFN web page http://www.apfn.org/apfn/irstax.htm ]] All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was US-UK Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the US and the UK, payable to the UK The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB’s-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says US with holding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of US Form #8288, #8288a. These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads US-UK Tax Treaty Claims. Isn’t it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the UK? Everybody is always looking to 26 USC for the law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to it’s udders ? <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>The answer is no.</span> La respuesta es no.</span> I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don’t even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money, which is debt. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all breed more slaves. You see, we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope. Now the picture will become much clearer after reading the next few paragraphs. We will now show the Popes involvement in the scheme of things. “Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations.” Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822) If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale,(Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. <span class=”notranslate” onmouseover=”_tipon(this)” onmouseout=”_tipoff()”><span class=”google-src-text” style=”direction: ltr; text-align: left”>Vol.</span> Vol.</span> I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world? The Pope (Vicar of Christ) claims to be the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1492. Don’t let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be free, You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional entities which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions. THE END I hope you learned someting from the Essays. Stephen wrote hundreds of them. Some of them will never be released because they are extremely controversial and would really upset just about everyone. However, to see what a Police State Pennsylvania is go to http://www.prisoners.com. This site is dedicated to showing the world what is happening in Pennsylvania. You won’t believe it. There are hundreds of examples on this site of the absolutely twisted actions of the people of Pennsylvania. I’m not going to tell you exactly what is on the site, you will have to see it for yourself. It is beyond your wildest nightmares. Read everything in the Public Enemies section in its entirety first. There are about a hundred articles in this section alone. You will never come to Pennsylvania again after reading them. Another web site dedicated to the tens of thousands of atrocities committed here in Pennsylvania recently is http://www.keystonereport.com. I recommend the Philly Atrocities section and its weekly archives. This section is found in the left side column. If you would like to read more essays that were written by Stephen Ames and others let me know. I can be reached at:

REUNIÓN SU Strawman

Legal UCC.Com

Legal UCC.Com

L

2013, UCC.Com legal, una división de tecnología de la información del afiliado, LLC. Todos los derechos reservados

Paquete de Conocimiento de Redención de UCC:

UCC Prisionero y encarcelamiento
Guild de Estudio

Uniform Código de Comercio (UCC-1) Paquete:

Curso de preparación de documentos UCC-1 VOL.23

UCC Prisionero y Encarcelamiento Study Guild VOL.6

Curso de Conocimiento de Redención de la UCC VOL.8

Paquete de Entrenamiento de Acreedor de Parte Asegurada:

Curso de preparación de documentos de acreedores garantizados por el partido VOL.36

CPN SECRETS PAQUETE:

Aumente su puntaje de crédito más de 700 literalmente durante la noche

Legal UCC Asegurado Parte Acreedor y UCC1 Servicios en Línea

Soporte de UCC CS: 1-888-411-9410

Programas de estudio inmediatos: Haga clic en Programa para obtener más información!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s